Search results

yes because as is clearly the case here the father had murder on his mind the morning of the incident. he was lucky that someone just happened by and tried to rape his 4 year old daughter so that he could then murder him as pedo-killers are known to do. kill a pedo today to save your daughter...

they should start exporting it to other countries

UPDATE: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/texas-dad-beat-daughter-alleged-molester-death-face-charges-article-1.1098833#ixzz1yM39MJEP I'm not saying I was right, but I was right

that has a whole different meaning at Valvetime.net

http://news.yahoo.com/minneapolis-swat-officer-charged-assault-234917623.html lol ya ok

it has become a lot worse in the last few months. there are days where there are no new posts in many of the subsections. I blame the ugly dude with the bowl haircut

I dont know if you people have noticed but this community is in it's death throes. new threads are far in between. as hl2.netter once said at the end days of this forum it'll just be me posting to my own threads. we are almost there

"her father's pending legal difficulties" I very much doubt he'll be charged with anything "under the circumstances as the actor reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.31 or 9.32 in using force or deadly force to protect himself against the unlawful...

ya but he wouldnt have to plead temp insanity as the law is on his side. he has a right to use deadly force http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/9.33.00.html

you're missing a big component to this: a 47 year old half naked man was on top of his 4 year old daughter if there was a case that lends validity to the defense of temporary insanity causing death this is it. a jury will most likely see it this way, barring any extenuating circumstances.

well that is why it's called pointer pointer

grand jury still has to convene to see whether charges will be laid. they get to decide if self defense requirements were met http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/12/texas-district-attorney-to-present-beating-death-case-to-grand-jury-after-probe/

doesnt have to be life threatening. simply doing harm is justification enough. the girl is 4 years old. sexual assualt WOULD cause grevious harm. In the Criminal Code of Canada, "bodily harm" is defined as "any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the health or comfort of the person...

sure it does but you have to prove he intended to kill the attacker. or that he was in the right frame of mind to understand what he was doing and that it could have unforseen consequences. classic case of being in an emotional state that could have impaired his judgement.his lawyer could...

http://www.pointerpointer.com/ neat site

right. if the crown bothered to press charges. the canadian charter of rights allows people to use whatever force necessary to defend themselves from assault. a jury wouldnt convict him also nothing is worth moving to texas

deadly force used in defense of family is ethical to me. I'm sure most people would agree

defense is not murder. texas laws allows for self defense of others. the courts get to decide if his response to the threat to his daughter was appropriate. no jury would convict him if they decided to press charges. so far they havent SUBCHAPTER C. PROTECTION OF PERSONS 9.32. DEADLY FORCE IN...

they should give him a medal http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2157738/Father-beat-man-death-catching-molest-year-old-daughter.html#ixzz1xc2AiumI

hahahahahahahaha LETS GET DRUNK AND GO LOOK FOR A JOB! http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/11/12167990-hitchhiker-writing-the-kindness-of-america-memoir-shot-by-motorist-in-montana?lite