So I played it for a couple more hours last night and it is actually fun. Doesn't change the fact that this is the least amount of actual change between any two CoD games to date. But a lot of the minor changes actually rather profoundly change the gameplay.
I'm still ****ing pissed, because...
So I'm here to admit I was wrong
Seriously. This is MW2 with slightly different maps and a jumbled up version of existing killstreaks and perks. See, I defended this one right away because the slight differences in quality and gameplay between all the other ones were sufficient to keep me...
youre right stern its about a bunch of shitty characters that suck and have to deal with zombies. this time they dealt with one zombie that was trapped in a hole. EXCITING
AND THEN THEY PORKED
side note: ive discovered that complaining about the show every week is more fun than watching it...
You're acting like the guy wore a stained wife beater. It's not even a bad shirt, sheesh. When you're reviewing a video game I think it's fairly normal to dress casually.
you could coach her through it by sticking your dick in her, because that's honestly the only possible way i could ever imagine giving a shit about someone in such a retarded situation as this. it's also clear and to the point!
it's possible jesus might not be down with that, but man, f*ck...
Splitscreen online multiplayer is what sold me. I like playing CoD games with my friends and family quite a bit actually, and it's worth $60 a year to me for an overhaul and update to graphics, maps, weapons, perks and all. I really don't understand the undying hatred and I never will. I've seen...
So... a group of unorganized and anonymous people demand one of the most ruthless and violent criminal groups in history to release an unconfirmed and unnamed captive. If the captive is not freed, the group plans to release the identities of many of the cartel's members. The source of this...
I was wondering if youtube might auto-detect that sort of thing, but if something like that does exist it wouldn't be all that much more complicated for the algorithm to also check the mirrored image.
I think some people on YouTube are under the impression that mirroring content evades copyright infringement.
I mean I guess they could be right, but I don't see how.