Weird. I don't know what version I have on my work PC but I'll check on Monday. I'm assuming it's new because it has tabs. LOL @ IE and old company hardware/software
If regulated I think their advertising would be even more restricted than tobacco is. So basically probably just through cool brand names (which is basically the way it is now for new strains)
I don't think legalization will decrease nor increase the average percentage of users. Legalizing...
If you're caught with marijuana here it is a felony offense punishable by prison time. Not county jail, state prison.
You are missing the entire point. Why should people be sent to prison for possessing marijuana? That law needs to be repealed. If I am caught with even a crumb of marijuana...
Strange, at my work computer, the reply box at the bottom of a thread is the same color as the dark background and the text (so you cant see the letters as you type them)
At home now, though, and it's a white box with black text. Unless you guys changed it since I last logged in.
Do you think alcohol and cigarettes should be felonies for posession as well? If not, you're a total hypocrite. If so, at least you're not a hypocrite, but you're still very mistaken.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PAT_ROBERTSON_MARIJUANA?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-03-08-13-11-19
Not much longer until legalization is achieved. Discuss.
The only legitimate US revolution that would not be treason is one that seeks to force the government to abide by the US Constitution. Intentional legislation and abuse of seperation of powers that violate the constitution purposely should be seen as seditious activity as well. It's one thing...
There is no defending the actions of the weather underground. They pushed, through bombings and subsequent armed rebellion, violent overthrow of the American government for the installation of a Communist regime. That is/was their stated goal, not some right wing rhetoric to discredit them...
That's kind of the point I was getting at. Depending on your circumstances at that exact moment the human mind has a funny way of judging and reflecting on its own morality, and it varies from incident to incident. When I say 'benefit' it's for the one doing the action. You're looking at it...
Maybe killing someone before they're able to kill you or those close to you. Or you see some cash fly out of someones purse as theyre getting into their car and you just gather it up and it gets you enough gas money to make it home, etc. Being able to do things like that when necessary without...
Why would they enlist into the infantry or special ops then? That is what the article and this thread is referring to. Not "fobbits" and administrative/support troops.
You only go infantry if you want to see combat, or you're conscripted. That's pretty obvious, there are a hundred other jobs...
A private employer should not be forced to pay for a benefit or product they do not want to. The arguement that 'oh you're a slut' has nothing to do with it regardless of if they are or aren't. It's about freedom of choice.
I believe people in positions of power, or influence/shared groupings with those in power, will do whatever it takes to keep that secure. Particularly the senior leadership of a group who would consider people like Breitbart their archenemy, not the way the consider an innocent civilian that...
You have to have at least a little streak of crazy to enter that environment willingly. Same goes for any abnormal hyperviolent or hyper suspicious environment like criminal enterprise. I wouldn't use the word sociopath but at least a bit of what I like to call "straight not giving a ****!"...