Search results

Perhaps not as bad as Vice City, but there will be visual popping in-game.

Valve is not going to be using the technology they licensed from INTEL for Team Fortress 2 in Half-Life 2. Instead of using INTEL's dynamic LOD based architecture, Valve is going to be going with a traditional STATIC LOD system. Problems which arise from STATIC LOD are: - Visual...

Singleplayer or Multiplayer.... tough decision... I vote for none of the above. I'd rather play both at the same time, if you get what I'm saying. :dork:

No, but it sounds like unfinished AI to me. AI that wasn't ready to be shown off at the time, or it would have been.

As far as I believe, the AI for Half-Life 2 wasn't finished for E3. Instead of showing off some really dumb AI doing stupid things, Valve instead turned off some functions for it. Essentially most of the AI, (but not all) became poles stuck in the ground. E.g. the combine grunts not moving...

Actually that was an assumption I made. Take it with a grain of salt.

No, I think you're dense.

DEMO = DEMONSTRATION FYI :eek:

You can set the delay for how long fragments/gibs stay on the ground in modifications for Half-Life 1, but it's only faded out for performance reasons. Same goes for Half-Life 2. But yeah, it'd be nice if certain things would stay around forever.

If you pushed secondary fire on the Glock in Half-Life 1, it'd fire rapidly.

I like to tinker with Half-Life's AI in Sven Co-op... I'm quite fond of optimizing it and adding new enhancements so that it can kick some ass more effectively. I was just a little bit curious about a few things concerning the AI in Half-Life 2. Question 1 - Can some types of creatures...

Gee they looked like they were breathing to me. How would you animate it? :dork:

Crap, come on. That was a feature in Half-Life 1 for god sakes. :dozey:

You're so incredibly wrong it's not even funny. The AMD processor would be "better" in your example, because of a few things. If an AMD CPU running at 2ghz can come close to matching an Intel CPU running at 3ghz, the AMD CPU is better because it is obviously more optimized than Intel's...

Well, not exactly another "batch." Both companies have new chips under development... We'll just have to wait and see.

You'll just have to wait for AMD's next round of processors, and they'll be kicking some ass again.

I'm straight AMD from now on. Intels are expensive. It's amazing that a 3200+ clocked at 2ghz can almost beat a Pentium4 clocked 1ghz faster. :thumbs:

This is the first time I've seen someone ask this type of question and NOT list an uber high-end machine. :dork:

Oh my god, it's the evil Sniper! AGAIN! :x

Oh my god, it's the evil Sniper!