Sprafa
Tank
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2003
- Messages
- 5,742
- Reaction score
- 0
AP said:Planned are nine official balls, a youth concert, a parade, a fireworks display and, of course, Bush's second swearing-in ceremony at noon on Jan. 20. The cost will be between $30 million and $40 million, an amount that does not include expenses for security
hmm...about the same they're sending to Asia right now...as a supposed "initial package" ... :O
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication (Pentagon advisory panel) said:Finally, Muslims see Americans as strangely narcissistic -- namely, that the war is all about us. As the Muslims see it, everything about the war is -- for Americans -- really no more than an extension of American domestic politics and its great game. This perception is of course necessarily heightened by election-year atmospherics, but nonetheless sustains their impression that when Americans talk to Muslims they are really just talking to themselves.
no comment
wait, there's more!
The new Intelligence reform bill will create a national ID card by federalizing driver's licenses. The Intel bill also creates a "Civil Liberties Board" charged with investigating whether the new legislation adversely affects civil rights. It has no subpoena power and is subordinate to the NID, the President and the Attorney General.
It extends the powers of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allowing the overturn of the "probable cause" provision of the 4th Amendment in the investigation of terror suspects. Now the law has been expanded to include a "lone wolf" provision; supposedly aimed at an individual terrorist acting without the support of a foreign government. In fact, the purpose of the new provision is to allow unlimited surveillance of any American without the hassle of having to prove even the "remotest" connection to organized terror or a foreign government. It is a "blank check" for law enforcement to eschew all privacy laws without fear of reprimand. It is the end of the 4th amendment.
More importantly, if someone is arrested (as was the case with 1200 Muslims after 9-11) as a terrorist suspect, he can be refused bail and IMPRISONED INDEFINITLY WITHOUT CHARGES. The moniker of "terrorist" trumps the underlying principle of American jurisprudence, that is, the "presumption of innocence" Now, prisoners will have to prove that they aren't guilty; a difficult prospect when there is no process in place to challenge the terms of their detention. Consider the comments of Judge Antonin Scalia in this regard: "The very core of liberty secured by our Anglo-Saxon system of separated powers has been freedom from indefinite imprisonment at the will of the Executive."
Last one is biased (tried to cut it, decided not to half-way), but still gives a few interesting facts