3dmark06 is out :)

Seeking faster mirrors than gamershell plz.

Edit - fileplanet has it, that should be faster.
 
I believe that if I even tried to run this, my computer would kick me in the nuts.
 
wtf, i let it 'scan my system' for the best settings, and when it runs it runs at 5-10fps, and at one point actually drops to 0fps...that's why i just quit it.

2.8GHz P4 (HT) 1mb l2 cache
1GB pc3200
x800pro 256mb
 
Wow! It looks stunning! I crapped my pants 3 times! Too bad I cant run it.

My computer would most likely blow up or would slap me for even attempting something as silly as that. 9800 128 meg, 3000+ 64 bit 700 pin, 768 megs of ram. PWNED!
 
2325 3DMarks
--------
SM2.0 Score: 982
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 890
CPU Score: 898

And after a slight video card overclock:

2559 Marks
---------
SM2.0 Score: 1106
HDR/SM3.0 Score: 993
CPU Score: 898
 
My scores:

1863
--
SM2.0 : 753
HDR/SM3.0 : 674
CPU : 997

The CPU benchmark was really tedious... below 0.5 FPS for me.
Also the Deep Freeze benchmark were pretty cool, imagine a new 'The Thing' game with those graphics. :E
 
I don't think I'll subject my poor baby to this kind of torture. The last 3dMark I ran on it was like... 2001 or 2003 and it did poorly.
 
_Z_Ryuken said:
I don't think I'll subject my poor baby to this kind of torture. The last 3dMark I ran on it was like... 2001 or 2003 and it did poorly.
DO IT, I've never seen 1-digit 3dmark scores before.
 
This program has gotten more useless with every year. Unless you have the latest £3500 PC you will barely get more than 10fps on anything.

SM2 score - 898
CPU score - 790
 
JellyWorld said:
DO IT, I've never seen 1-digit 3dmark scores before.
:laugh:

Ok I just might. Just for you and your awful sadist pleasure of seeing my CPU tortured.
---

Scratch that. I don't meet the minimum required HD space. Need 1.5 have 1.3. ):
 
StardogChampion said:
This program has gotten more useless with every year. Unless you have the latest £3500 PC you will barely get more than 10fps on anything.

SM2 score - 898
CPU score - 790
How is that usless?
3DMark has always been around to push the latest hardware.
It's meant for that.
 
I get an average of 0 FPS.
:(
Still the best Graphics my PC has ever displayed though.
 
I got approximately 8891 fps on all 10 tests. It may go up to 8898 if I overclock my CPU.
 
I ran this last night (rig in spec) and my overall 3dmark score was around 4100. Average fps seemed to be around the 15-20 mark. Having said, from early results it seems that X1800XT's are being caned by the standard GTX cards, which is somewhat contrary to most game tests in reviews *scratches head*
 
1747 3DMarks, damn. My computer is turning old again, and I've only had it for a year. :(
 
Ouch -
1288 3D Marks
SM2.0 Score - 763
CPU Score - 330

Shit, time to upgrade, and get rid of my Intel CPU
 
Nat Turner said:
I got approximately 8891 fps on all 10 tests. It may go up to 8898 if I overclock my CPU.
Hand over youre PC. We demand it.
 
untitled8qf.jpg


Time to upgrade Freemantor lol
 
Set the vid card clock speed to 370MHz cpu, 1058 RAM (stock is 350/1000) and it boosted my score from 1800 to 2401 marks. OCed it to (385/1100) and it choked bad. The system's showing its age after 16 months but it still runs well enough to last another 16 months ... right? :o

Gainward 6800GT, Athlon64 3400, 2GB Corsair XMS single channel.
 
tbh... Theres no reason for anyone to upgrade yet... All your rigs will still play any game you throw at it, at high, if not close to high settings.
 
Back
Top