jverne
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2004
- Messages
- 4,302
- Reaction score
- 0
ok...so most of you know the theories. i have just watched some alex jones an some other movie about wtc on google.
i agree that lot's of things are made up in those vids, but how can anyone ignore the public statments of officials, that clearly contradict each other! like saying that wtc7 was destroyed by fire and later saing it was pulled down, why has numerous evidence gone missing and of course there are also the thecnical questions, how can an overenginired tower collaps, by a fire that was extinguising itself? that the buildings were certified to withstand such impacts? the strangely good implosions of the buildings?
you all know what is about, so could you please in form of a list post argument for this theory and against (the planed demolition of wtc), with no "i think"s in them! il'll start!
-3 billion insurance policy compared to 200 million investments
-public contradictions of high officials and involved people (it was pulled down/the fire caused it)
-little high quality images and videos from the scene despite being in the center of the city
-US high millitary technology (NORAD) to intercept planes
-some hijacers found alive
-hijacers passport found, but no black boxes
-people found in the aerea supposed to be in flames
-certificets of strucural integrity to whithstand such impacts
-the steel support columns melted, despite theoretical impossibility to attain such high temperatures with jet fuel (even in laboratories under perfect circumstances)
-not in one single case fire brought down modern steel structures (i repeat NOT IN ONE SINGLE CASE)
-the fall of the building was not very coincidencal
-the ability to engieneer a building demolition in few hours (wtc7)
-...
some data that is in between fact and opinion:
-seizmiografic recording of explosions
-recordings of firefighters putting out flames in the building
-abnormaly low wrecage at the pentagon crash
-nearer buldings less damaged than the further away
-...
i left out the comments of people seing this and that or hearing something, comments of alex jones that bush is in the skull e bones, i left out my own assumptions of the event, i even left out the video showing the "supposed" demoliton explosives going off right before the bulding explode, they are far to low quality!
people please leave out all your oppinions and assumptions or any other assumptions, try to post as objective as you can and in a form of a list!
it will be fun to see who has "more right" :smoking:
i agree that lot's of things are made up in those vids, but how can anyone ignore the public statments of officials, that clearly contradict each other! like saying that wtc7 was destroyed by fire and later saing it was pulled down, why has numerous evidence gone missing and of course there are also the thecnical questions, how can an overenginired tower collaps, by a fire that was extinguising itself? that the buildings were certified to withstand such impacts? the strangely good implosions of the buildings?
you all know what is about, so could you please in form of a list post argument for this theory and against (the planed demolition of wtc), with no "i think"s in them! il'll start!
-3 billion insurance policy compared to 200 million investments
-public contradictions of high officials and involved people (it was pulled down/the fire caused it)
-little high quality images and videos from the scene despite being in the center of the city
-US high millitary technology (NORAD) to intercept planes
-some hijacers found alive
-hijacers passport found, but no black boxes
-people found in the aerea supposed to be in flames
-certificets of strucural integrity to whithstand such impacts
-the steel support columns melted, despite theoretical impossibility to attain such high temperatures with jet fuel (even in laboratories under perfect circumstances)
-not in one single case fire brought down modern steel structures (i repeat NOT IN ONE SINGLE CASE)
-the fall of the building was not very coincidencal
-the ability to engieneer a building demolition in few hours (wtc7)
-...
some data that is in between fact and opinion:
-seizmiografic recording of explosions
-recordings of firefighters putting out flames in the building
-abnormaly low wrecage at the pentagon crash
-nearer buldings less damaged than the further away
-...
i left out the comments of people seing this and that or hearing something, comments of alex jones that bush is in the skull e bones, i left out my own assumptions of the event, i even left out the video showing the "supposed" demoliton explosives going off right before the bulding explode, they are far to low quality!
people please leave out all your oppinions and assumptions or any other assumptions, try to post as objective as you can and in a form of a list!
it will be fun to see who has "more right" :smoking:
