L
lukrebu
Guest
Take note that I haven't been a member for 5 days, and don't know why that's a prerequisite for Private Messaging, but this was the only way I could see to respond, short of giving "Tantalus" my email address or AIM Screename. And I shudder to think about the outcome of THAT scenario.
In any case, I hope you find what he said to be amusing. I know I did.
A pawn huh? Bash you down? Following you?
Your entire private message was off-base. A pawn? Someone's been playing a tad too much chess, don't you think? Bashing you down? I called you what you are in *ONE* of your threads, and you vehemently denied it, resorting to "definitions" of words to continue arguing with me. A weak, not to mention futile, effort to disguise your inner spammer. The effort failed, by the way.
Following you. You really think so? Yeah, probably. I saw you, and you stood out as a horrible spammer. You've posted about 50 or 60 things today, and that says something in itself. I decided to see if you had ANY quality posts and wasn't surprised when I found out that no, in fact, you did not. I replied while I was in the topics so I didn't feel like the entire time I had spent researching a spammer was wasted.
So you admit you're just looking to popularize your threads and, accordingly, your persona? Wow, and you STILL deny you're a spammer. Or is that just in public?
Seriously, try talking normally for a change. Your attempts at using chess references and thanking me for propagating your spam in "old english", for lack of a better phrase, is comical.
Cheers, bud.
In any case, I hope you find what he said to be amusing. I know I did.
Tantalus said:
A pawn huh? Bash you down? Following you?
Your entire private message was off-base. A pawn? Someone's been playing a tad too much chess, don't you think? Bashing you down? I called you what you are in *ONE* of your threads, and you vehemently denied it, resorting to "definitions" of words to continue arguing with me. A weak, not to mention futile, effort to disguise your inner spammer. The effort failed, by the way.
Following you. You really think so? Yeah, probably. I saw you, and you stood out as a horrible spammer. You've posted about 50 or 60 things today, and that says something in itself. I decided to see if you had ANY quality posts and wasn't surprised when I found out that no, in fact, you did not. I replied while I was in the topics so I didn't feel like the entire time I had spent researching a spammer was wasted.
So you admit you're just looking to popularize your threads and, accordingly, your persona? Wow, and you STILL deny you're a spammer. Or is that just in public?
Seriously, try talking normally for a change. Your attempts at using chess references and thanking me for propagating your spam in "old english", for lack of a better phrase, is comical.
Cheers, bud.
