ahaha...this is awesome (drunk party girls and facebook)

Their faces give me nightmares!
 
thats basically 90 percent of facebook right there...girls+alcohol+cameras = proof mommy was a rebel
 
These were my personal photos, what the ****?! :|
 
I saw your Web site. What do you mean you don't want to have sex with me? Your web site says you do.
What do you mean you don't want to have sex with me? Your web site says you do.
Your Web site says you do!
YOUR WEB SITE SAYS YOU DO!!!

Oh man, I have been there so many times. Bitch.
 
On the right they have 'most popular slideshows'. I read down it, and saw "3 female teachers charged with having sex with students". Then I read a bit further and saw "Best foods for sex" and thought "school dinners, apparently"
 
im poking every girl in that slideshow, then hopefully poking every girl in that slideshow...
 
Cant say I saw anything spectacular there, but perhaps that speaks more of my desensitization to friends doing drunken things if anything.

TBH employers need to learn to STFU and hire folk. If people didn't know how to keep their worklife and drunken party life separate civilization would have collapsed long ago.
 
Cant say I saw anything spectacular there, but perhaps that speaks more of my desensitization to friends doing drunken things if anything.

TBH employers need to learn to STFU and hire folk. If people didn't know how to keep their worklife and drunken party life separate civilization would have collapsed long ago.

I disagree entirely. If I were an employer, I would not want employees who have drunken parties regularly. It would mean lower productivity as a whole, and would look very bad for the company. I also wouldn't hire anyone who posts crazy pictures of themselves at college parties, because it shows that they blew off college and partied rather than studied.

Also, not everyone has drunken parties every night. If people did do that, then yes things would go downhill pretty quickly. Luckily, there are sensible people who don't do this shit. And as an employer, I would hire the sensible people over the partiers.
 
I disagree entirely. If I were an employer, I would not want employees who have drunken parties regularly. It would mean lower productivity as a whole, and would look very bad for the company. I also wouldn't hire anyone who posts crazy pictures of themselves at college parties, because it shows that they blew off college and partied rather than studied.

Enjoy a failing business because you won't be able to hire anyone with those irrational unreasonable "standards".
 
That's barely funny. It's almost embarrassing. Not sure who for, but seriously a drunk woman is rarely a hot woman (unless it's mutual).
 
I also wouldn't hire anyone who posts crazy pictures of themselves at college parties, because it shows that they blew off college and partied rather than studied.

They're always mutually exclusive, right?
 
While I wasn't that interested in the article itself, it was an interesting way of presenting it. A written piece combined with a slideshow
 
I disagree entirely. If I were an employer, I would not want employees who have drunken parties regularly. It would mean lower productivity as a whole, and would look very bad for the company. I also wouldn't hire anyone who posts crazy pictures of themselves at college parties, because it shows that they blew off college and partied rather than studied.

Also, not everyone has drunken parties every night. If people did do that, then yes things would go downhill pretty quickly. Luckily, there are sensible people who don't do this shit. And as an employer, I would hire the sensible people over the partiers.

Congratulations, you've created a non-existent social dichotomy!
 
Congratulations, you've created a non-existent social dichotomy!

It might be an unfair dichotomy, but I know what, as an employer, I would think. If you have the option of choosing someone with credentials who parties, and someone with credentials who doesn't party, you would probably choose the person who doesn't party, all things being equal. Unless you're running a strip joint. Or a bar.
 
Actually, all things being equal, I would choose the person who had the personality best suited to my other employees and the work that is to be done. Whether someone decides to get stupid drunk on their own time is none of my business.
 
Oh jesus, I have seen former employers shitfaced when I have been working in clubs. I have aslo met them when i was shitfaced. And they then bought me beer and got me in to places with a 25 year old age limit.

I miss that place:(
 
A lot might disagree with me, but I like myspace 50x more than facebook. Facebook seems like too... "Hey look i'm white, have lots of money, and have more friends than you, and drink only so I can show off the pictures the next day."

Myspace is better lol
 
It might be an unfair dichotomy, but I know what, as an employer, I would think. If you have the option of choosing someone with credentials who parties, and someone with credentials who doesn't party, you would probably choose the person who doesn't party, all things being equal. Unless you're running a strip joint. Or a bar.

I wouldn't want to work at such a lame company anyways. I hate coworkers who have sticks up their ass and unimaginative conservative middle management.
 
Back
Top