Bad idea?

Foxtrot

Newbie
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
6,016
Reaction score
0
A site I made in HTML class is getting posted on the school website, it is a LAN party website. In one of the pictures I hid a link on my name, when you click the link it brings you to this picture. It is the school emblem, adapted a bit.
 
hahahaa :LOL:

its only a bad idea if you get caught...oh and slightly offensive, being half jewish i don't exactly love talking about Adolf :(
 
Hectic Glenn said:
hahahaa :LOL:

its only a bad idea if you get caught...oh and slightly offensive, being half jewish i don't exactly love talking about Adolf :(
Do you take offense to that? Being half jewish. It is not meant in any way to relate my supporting of Hitler, just showing that the school is a lot like a Nazi regime.
 
nah not me, i got used to it long ago, it just turns into daily banter these days. Its funny, i know its not supportive. Just never something i'd go out my way to talk about if you get me! What would your school do if they saw that though and there was jewish senior staff!
 
Hectic Glenn said:
nah not me, i got used to it long ago, it just turns into daily banter these days. Its funny, i know its not supportive. Just never something i'd go out my way to talk about if you get me! What would your school do if they saw that though and there was jewish senior staff!
I would probably get expelled, but by the time the site is up I will be out of school (almost) so I have nothing to worry about.
 
Risking get told off at school and maybe suspended for a very stupid picture of hitler?

Oh yeah, bad idea :)
 
I once got called to the principal's office along with my parents because I used a picture of Hitler in my "create an advertisement" assignment :p
 
is there something wrong with using the image of a person? Should we try to deny that Hitler existed or that he had a major influence on the 20th century. Although putting it on the school emblem will definitely get you in shit.
 
It may be a bad idea....but I love it. :D
 
Dan said:
is there something wrong with using the image of a person? Should we try to deny that Hitler existed or that he had a major influence on the 20th century. Although putting it on the school emblem will definitely get you in shit.
The problem is in relating things to him. Show his picture in history when actually describing Nazi Germany. People only have a problem with using his image when it isn't in a historical setting.

Funny if you ask me but I know the school wouldn't think so. ;(
 
Even though it's a bad idea, I would really like to se the consequences :devil: :p
 
VERY bad idea. I know that it's treated different in the US... but still...
 
isnt it against the law to publish pics of hitler in germany? just curious ..I can see how that would anger many people
 
Uhm, I don't know... I think there's some kind of restriction, but of course in history books, documentaries, papers/magazines and even TV (well, not the real Hitler, but acted) there is no censorship or so. The swastika is legally somewhat troublesome though...
 
yes I played rtcw with german friends, some of them bought uk versions of the game because of the censorship
 
Hectic Glenn said:
oh and slightly offensive, being half jewish i don't exactly love talking about Adolf :(
I've never understood labels such as "half jewish". I can understand that, say, your dad was jewish and your mom was catholic...but saying you're "half jewish"...does that mean you practiced the Jewish Sabbath but still went to St. John's on Sunday?
 
CptStern said:
yes I played rtcw with german friends, some of them bought uk versions of the game because of the censorship

Ah yeah... video games... RTCW was censored, yes. I think games and comics (saw some Mangas that had changed swastikas in it) are things that maybe are considered too dangerous with such things in 'em because mainly played/read by kids. But as I said, movies sometimes include lot's of nazi-emblemes and even portrait Hitler (maybe you heard of the movie 'The Downfall/Der Untergang' which portraits the last days in the Führerbunker, was nominated for an Oscar even) - well, we actually do have a strange media-control system...
 
Hectic Glenn said:
hahahaa :LOL:

its only a bad idea if you get caught...oh and slightly offensive, being half jewish i don't exactly love talking about Adolf :(
heh me too Glenn, no wonder I always agree with your points of view

BTW I used to draw shwasticas and stuff when I was a kid, then when I got older I started getting really offended and sensitive to anything like that , then when I got a little older I thought about how I used to do things like that when I was a kid, then realized it had nothing to do with the person wanting to kill anyone that wasn't white as paper, it was just rebelion
 
It's only a bad idea if you're caught. I also used to have HTML projects, and I'd hide links to goatse and other things hidden throughout my work.
 
He_Who_Is_Steve said:
I've never understood labels such as "half jewish". I can understand that, say, your dad was jewish and your mom was catholic...but saying you're "half jewish"...does that mean you practiced the Jewish Sabbath but still went to St. John's on Sunday?

Actually,
You are jewish if your mother is jewish, but my dad is the one that is jewish, so I'm not.

But Im not practicing any religeon, I believe in god however, and convinced god rules.
 
Dalamari said:
Just replace it with Stalin and nobody will care
haha that's true! :LOL:

"Who the hell is that fat guy with the thick mustache?"
................
"I have no idea.... Super Mario, maybe?"

it's quite odd that Hitler get all the psycho-maniac-dictator credits
 
it's quite odd that Hitler get all the psycho-maniac-dictator credits

Well... that's probably because 1) he came from a 'normal' and western society and all the cruel things happened in it and 2) he had to most drastic ways of killing all those millions.
 
I really wouldn't care if I saw that.

But then thats me...and just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand ;)
 
Recoil said:
Well... that's probably because 1) he came from a 'normal' and western society and all the cruel things happened in it and 2) he had to most drastic ways of killing all those millions.
Stalin killed his own country men and was in no way helping anyone but himself by doing that. Hitler (horrible as it is, ofcourse) made money off of death. I would say Stalin was the bigger sadist, Hitler's idealogy was ****ED but atleast he had one(.... :x i know it's ****ed giving him credit for that but still, it's true).
 
Farrowlesparrow said:
But then thats me...and just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand ;)

I have a t-shirt that says that!

...

Yah... Not that anybody cares...
 
SupremePain said:
Stalin killed his own country men and was in no way helping anyone but himself by doing that. Hitler (horrible as it is, ofcourse) made money off of death. I would say Stalin was the bigger sadist, Hitler's idealogy was ****ED but atleast he had one(.... :x i know it's ****ed giving him credit for that but still, it's true).

IIRC Stalin killed around 3 times as many people as Hilter did. The primary difference is that Hilter targeted specific groups of people whereas Stalin pretty much killed anybody who even looked suspicous.
 
Dalamari said:
Just replace it with Stalin and nobody will care

Which his sad because he actually killed far more people, and they were mostly his own.
 
Back
Top