Boston Legal Pwns Bush Administration

[Puzzlemaker]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3835216593484109366&q=Boston+legal

Hehehehe.

 

[redpathogen]

You're unpatriotic. If it weren't for Bush you'd be speaking Baghdadian right now and feeding Saddam's family grapes.

 

[Mechagodzilla]

No u are.

Nice rant and all, but if the woman gets away with tax evasion, that's way unrealistic.

 

[Puzzlemaker]

No u are.

Nice rant and all, but if the woman gets away with tax evasion, that's way unrealistic.

True, but I liked his rant. Made me laugh.

 

[gick]

I don't think she should get away with tax evasion but that was a hella good rant.

 

[Glirk Dient]

Nice rant...I found it rather funny how he was fed up with people not standing up to the administration...as if everyone agreed with everything he said. His rant was well said and all but people who think everyone should agree with them bother me, as if they are the only ones correct and no one else has any inteligent arguments for anything.

 

[JNightshade]

That was great

 

[$kelet0r]

meh
i thought it was a poor argument - it's more sensational because it was on US TV
still I kind of like Boston Legal oh and and it stars Capt. KIRK!!!!!

 

[Angry Lawyer]

It has LAWYERS, therefore is instagood.

-Angry Lawyer

 

[jimbo118]

James Spader is an awesome actor! kthxbai

 

[CptStern]

little known fact: I wrote that speech, no really


sensationalistic and highly unplausible/unrealistic but nice rant nonetheless

His rant was well said and all but people who think everyone should agree with them bother me, as if they are the only ones correct and no one else has any inteligent arguments for anything

if there's an intelligent argument supporting the war, I'd like to hear it ...up until this point not a single supporter of the war has had a convincing argument to support their cause

 

[SFLUFAN]

if there's an intelligent argument supporting the war, I'd like to hear it ...up until this point not a single supporter of the war has had a convincing argument to support their cause

That's because it's a left-wing, liberal interventionist conflict and therefore indefensible from a realist-based foreign policy perspective.

 

[CptStern]

That's because it's a left-wing, liberal interventionist conflict and therefore indefensible from a realist-based foreign policy perspective.

remind me again how a right wing conservative administration is left-wing? ...you're not trying to say that because it was humanitarian in nature (not that I would agree with that utter revisionist nonsense) it is inheritantly "liberal"?

 

[Solaris]

You're unpatriotic. If it weren't for Bush you'd be speaking Baghdadian right now and feeding Saddam's family grapes.

Bagdadian?!? wtf thats not a language you ignoramous.

And Stern don't bother, he thinks the war was started by Left wing trostikyists.

 

[$kelet0r]

Bagdadian?!? wtf thats not a language you ignoramous.

And Stern don't bother, he thinks the war was started by Left wing trostikyists.

i thought it was meant to be funny.....which it was kudos

 

[gick]

That's because it's a left-wing, liberal interventionist conflict and therefore indefensible from a realist-based foreign policy perspective

Uh-oh, hardcore Libertarian alert. WE HAVE A GOVERNMENT??? IT MUST BE COMMUNIST!!!!!!!