Bush: 'World War III' possible if Iran goes nuclear

CptStern

CptStern

suckmonkey
Joined
May 5, 2004
Messages
10,303
Reaction score
62
hooray for nutjobs with their fingers on the shiney red doomsday button

"If Iran had a nuclear weapon, it'd be a dangerous threat to world peace," Mr. Bush said at a White House news conference yesterday morning.

"If you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon."
Click to expand...



I wonder if future generations will ponder whether if given the opportunity they'd kill Bush in order to prevent ww3

more:

"We've got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy Israel," he said. "So I've told people that, if you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon."
Click to expand...

funny just switch some words around and it sounds exactly like what he was saying prior to the invasion of Iraq

"We've got a leader in Iraq who has announced that he wants to destroy America," he said. "So I've told people that, if you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make WMD."
Click to expand...

and it'll work, the idiots will eat it up, scream for a bloody invasion and then we'll all be dragged into a world war ...only you, america, can prevent this ..I hear wal-mart has periodic sales on ammo, scopes, night vision googles etc


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv...17.wbushiran1017/BNStory/GlobeSportsFootball/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20071018.BUSH18/TPStory/?query=Bush
 
*sigh*

With Bush in office, I think WWIII is more than possible: it's inevitable.
 
Didn't this same asshole claim world war III started with 9/11? Wouldn't this be World War IV?
 
And yet nobody has the balls to impeach or assassinate him. It's funny... one of the most hated presidents it seems in a long long time, and nobody even makes an attempt at his life.

There's people out there who kill themselves in protest, but aren't willing to take somebody else with them that will make their protest successful?
 
as much as it would amuse me (in a non judeo-christian moral ethics sort of way) I dont think giving bush a lead headsmack would solve the problem ..they've been gunning for iran since before poor old george had the ventriloquists forearm thrust up his arse, killing him would do little except possibly galvanise all americans towards war
 
Raziaar said:
And yet nobody has the balls to impeach or assassinate him. It's funny... one of the most hated presidents it seems in a long long time, and nobody even makes an attempt at his life.
Click to expand...

You're not from the US are you? I hope not, Im sure its a matter of time before the secret service gets a hold of that one. :rolleyes:
 
No Limit said:
You're not from the US are you? I hope not, Im sure its a matter of time before the secret service gets a hold of that one. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I am from the US. Texas even. Nothing is going to happen to me. People discuss this sort of thing on the internet all the time. I don't even go 10% as far as some people do.

Especially since I'm not saying somebody should kill him, I'm saying it's surprising that nobody has made the attempt. I certainly would never encourage anybody to try it. It's a stupid thing to do, and you can make your point in far less violent ways... for instance by impeaching him and the vice president, and perhaps other people who help do his policy making.
 
Raziaar said:
I am from the US. Texas even. Nothing is going to happen to me. People discuss this sort of thing on the internet all the time. I don't even go 10% as far as some people do.

Especially since I'm not saying somebody should kill him, I'm saying it's surprising that nobody has made the attempt. I certainly would never encourage anybody to try it. It's a stupid thing to do, and you can make your point in far less violent ways... for instance by impeaching him and the vice president, and perhaps other people who help do his policy making.
Click to expand...

I understand what you are saying, personally I'm to paranoid to even discuss such a thing. I'd rather not deal with those assholes.
 
im anti bush, but the iranian president DID actually say he will bring a holocaust on Israel soooo.... :/ idk but nukes seems the best way to accompish something like that.
 
Ravioli said:
im anti bush, but the iranian president DID actually say he will bring a holocaust on Israel soooo.... :/ idk but nukes seems the best way to accompish something like that.
Click to expand...

no he didnt, he said the state of israel should be wiped from the map, not jews ..it was puposefully mistranslated ..and even had he said that all jews must die, since when do we invade another country based on words?
 
Just don't speak. Don't say one more ****ing word. Asshole.

Never seen someone so oblivious. How any member of his party can support these comments is beyond me. I know Republicans already are distancing themselves from this maniac, but comments like thes...he needs to be annihilated by both sides of the aisle and NOW.

Can a prez get censured for comments like these?????
 
WW III is just exaggeration meant to counter Putin's speech from two days ago. Putin downplayed the whole Iran situation which obviously irked some people in the White House. It's just for show, but eventually the debate on Iran will go to the UN security council again and we'll see an even bigger divide between Russia and the US. China will probably side with Iran as well. All this talk is also related to the 2008 elections, republicans are going to look for a candidate with a "plan" on Iran.

If you ask me, nothing is going to happen. While some crazy people in DC are advocating another war & invasion, most are promoting the reform from inside approach. And that's all fine and dandy in theory, but it just won't happen.
 
This quotation seems to fit nicely in this thead:

I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
Click to expand...
- Albert Einstein
 
And yet nobody has the balls to impeach or assassinate him. It's funny... one of the most hated presidents it seems in a long long time, and nobody even makes an attempt at his life.

There's people out there who kill themselves in protest, but aren't willing to take somebody else with them that will make their protest successful?
Click to expand...

Oh, good grief Charlie Brown.

Can't you think of anything else more constructive then blowing up Lucy's Lemonade stand?
 
Gunner said:
most are promoting the reform from inside approach. And that's all fine and dandy in theory, but it just won't happen.
Click to expand...

Supporting terrorism is a fine and dandy theory?
 
I'm not sure you understand what I said. Reform/opposition movements, funding projects like that.
 
Gunner said:
I'm not sure you understand what I said. Reform/opposition movements, funding projects like that.
Click to expand...

In the past this has been funding terrorist organizations. Are you saying this has suddenly changed with the most right wing administration ever running the show?

We already know that in Iraq our own government is funding terrorism, you don't think they do this in Iran too when they say they are trying to change them internally?
 
Really? I'd like to see you name one instance where the US has funded terrorism in Iran.
 
The official news agency IRNA quoted an unnamed "responsible official" as saying on Friday that Zehi confessed that the attacks were part of U.S. plans to provoke ethnic and religious violence in Iran

Warning: this image is disturbing. Nasrollah Shanbe Zehi moments before he was hanged.

Notice the bruises on his face, to me it's obvious that they beat the crap out of him and falsified the confession.

And read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Zahedan_bombing

And this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jundallah

On April 3, 2007, an ABC News report by Alexis Debat said the United States government had been secretly encouraging and advising PRMI in its attacks against Iranian targets. This support is said to have started in 2005 and to have arranged so that the United States provides no direct funding to the group, which would require congressional oversight and attract media attention.[4] The report was denied by Pakistan official sources [5]. Alexis Debat resigned from ABC News in June 2007, after ABC officials discovered that he faked his Ph.D at the Sorbonne University and ABC News is reviewing his prior reports.

So the reporter who broke out the story is essentially a pathological liar.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=3649165

It's all bullshit if you ask me and I seriously doubt the CIA is working with groups that have links to al-Qaeda.
 
No Limit said:
Didn't this same asshole claim world war III started with 9/11? Wouldn't this be World War IV?
Click to expand...

Can't wait for World War X

Wayhey for Roman Numerals :D

ravioli said:
m anti bush, but the iranian president DID actually say he will bring a holocaust on Israel soooo.... :/ idk but nukes seems the best way to accompish something like that
Click to expand...

But then he would have been responsible for the 100s of 1000s of Paletinians killed from the Nuclear Fallout
 
Gunner said:
The official news agency IRNA quoted an unnamed "responsible official" as saying on Friday that Zehi confessed that the attacks were part of U.S. plans to provoke ethnic and religious violence in Iran

Warning: this image is disturbing. Nasrollah Shanbe Zehi moments before he was hanged.

Notice the bruises on his face, to me it's obvious that they beat the crap out of him and falsified the confession.

And read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Zahedan_bombing

And this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jundallah

On April 3, 2007, an ABC News report by Alexis Debat said the United States government had been secretly encouraging and advising PRMI in its attacks against Iranian targets. This support is said to have started in 2005 and to have arranged so that the United States provides no direct funding to the group, which would require congressional oversight and attract media attention.[4] The report was denied by Pakistan official sources [5]. Alexis Debat resigned from ABC News in June 2007, after ABC officials discovered that he faked his Ph.D at the Sorbonne University and ABC News is reviewing his prior reports.

So the reporter who broke out the story is essentially a pathological liar.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=3649165

It's all bullshit if you ask me and I seriously doubt the CIA is working with groups that have links to al-Qaeda.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure they had more evidance of these connections than that guys word on it. If I remember correctly they had access to american and british weapons.

And we wouldn't support Al Qaeda? Dude, as you know we created Al Qaeda. And currently we are supporting terrorists in Iraq because they are friendly to the side we happen to support more. You honestly don't think that if we are willing to provide money, training, and arms to people that kill our soldiers in Iraq right now we aren't willing to do the same to terrorists in Iran?

If this is incorrect please do correct me, I cant seem to find much information on this right now and I am running out of time. Weren't we responsible for overthrowing the Iranian democracy in the 1970s by supporting these types of groups?
 
well this sucks
But with Iran's president saying things like:"we have no gays in Iran"
I wouldn't really trust him over Bush.
 
Someone please fill in a gap in my knowledge here

Seeing as everyone and their grandparents can go on the internet and work out how to build a bomb, I would assume its the enrichment process that bush is referring to? Or should be referring to, depending on if he was wearing his silly shorts that day.

Is working out the enrichment process the problem for those trying to build nukes, or is it the lack of rad. material?

Retrospective thought: the Silly Shorts are probably fused to his body anyway.
 
No Limit said:
I'm pretty sure they had more evidance of these connections than that guys word on it. If I remember correctly they had access to american and british weapons.

And we wouldn't support Al Qaeda? Dude, as you know we created Al Qaeda. And currently we are supporting terrorists in Iraq because they are friendly to the side we happen to support more. You honestly don't think that if we are willing to provide money, training, and arms to people that kill our soldiers in Iraq right now we aren't willing to do the same to terrorists in Iran?

If this is incorrect please do correct me, I cant seem to find much information on this right now and I am running out of time. Weren't we responsible for overthrowing the Iranian democracy in the 1970s by supporting these types of groups?
Click to expand...

Well yeah but Al-qaeda and the taliban were not the enemy back then, but back to your question - you asked me if I support terrorism (specifically US funded covert operations in Iran) - I'd have to answer first of all I didn't know before coming into thread that they had anything going on in Iran and secondly I guess I'm all for it. Sure beats doing nothing in my opinion. I mean all this mess is their fault, the US and western Europe ****ed Iran over so many times that it's practically their responsibility to remove the mollahs.

And I think you mean the 1950s because that's when Mossadegh was overthrown by the CIA in a coup. I'm assuming you're talking about Mossadegh because like Stern, you're probably not a fan of the Shah.
 
No Limit said:
I'm pretty sure they had more evidance of these connections than that guys word on it. If I remember correctly they had access to american and british weapons.

And we wouldn't support Al Qaeda? Dude, as you know we created Al Qaeda. And currently we are supporting terrorists in Iraq because they are friendly to the side we happen to support more. You honestly don't think that if we are willing to provide money, training, and arms to people that kill our soldiers in Iraq right now we aren't willing to do the same to terrorists in Iran?

If this is incorrect please do correct me, I cant seem to find much information on this right now and I am running out of time. Weren't we responsible for overthrowing the Iranian democracy in the 1970s by supporting these types of groups?
Click to expand...

Congrats. You just earned my most far fetched theory award.
 
Gunner said:
Well yeah but Al-qaeda and the taliban were not the enemy back then, but back to your question - you asked me if I support terrorism (specifically US funded covert operations in Iran) - I'd have to answer first of all I didn't know before coming into thread that they had anything going on in Iran and secondly I guess I'm all for it. Sure beats doing nothing in my opinion. I mean all this mess is their fault, the US and western Europe ****ed Iran over so many times that it's practically their responsibility to remove the mollahs.

And I think you mean the 1950s because that's when Mossadegh was overthrown by the CIA in a coup. I'm assuming you're talking about Mossadegh because like Stern, you're probably not a fan of the Shah.
Click to expand...

You know what I like about you Gunner, you are totally honest about what you believe. I respect that. :cheers:

But I'll have to get back to you tomorrow with my opinion on why I think those beliefs are ****ed up.
 
What an arrogant, fearmongering tossbag. Telling the world that IF Iran had A nuclear weapon, it'd be WWIII.
 
Ahmadinejad may be a fanatic, but he's not stupid. He knows that if he nukes either Washington or Tel Aviv, Iran will be annihilated.

Any nukes Iran makes will only be used to scare, which, although it's bad, is a basis to start WWIII on.
 
The Monkey said:
Ahmadinejad may be a fanatic, but he's not stupid. He knows that if he nukes either Washington or Tel Aviv, Iran will be annihilated.

Any nukes Iran makes will only be used to scare, which, although it's bad, is a basis to start WWIII on.
Click to expand...
He's a religious fanatic who might very well welcome death.
 
In his first major speech since leaving office in June, Blair told a charity dinner in New York: "Analogies with the past are never properly accurate and analogies especially with the rising fascism can be easily misleading but in pure chronology I sometimes wonder if we're not in the 1920s or 1930s again.
Click to expand...

Sounds like the pair have something big planned.
 
No Limit said:
You know what I like about you Gunner, you are totally honest about what you believe. I respect that. :cheers:

But I'll have to get back to you tomorrow with my opinion on why I think those beliefs are ****ed up.
Click to expand...

Well I'm just glad you don't hate me after my last little outburst in that other Iran thread. :p
 
We need a plan to impeach Bush and his administration. Here's a thought: everyone on this forum from the United States go from door to door and gather signatures calling for the impeachment of the worst president in history. Then, if there are enough signatures, send them to your representatives and post them on the internet. This is a risky plan however, as the federal government seems to place anyone that disagrees with the Nazi mentality on a no-fly list. And I'm sure the people you gathered the signatures from would be pissed if they ended up on a no fly list.
 
TheDude said:
We need a plan to impeach Bush and his administration. Here's a thought: everyone on this forum from the United States go from door to door and gather signatures calling for the impeachment of the worst president in history. Then, if there are enough signatures, send them to your representatives and post them on the internet. This is a risky plan however, as the federal government seems to place anyone that disagrees with the Nazi mentality on a no-fly list. And I'm sure the people you gathered the signatures from would be pissed if they ended up on a no fly list.
Click to expand...

lol






no:sleep:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MFL
Fascinating look at the ongoing psychological evolution of flat hieirarchies.
Replies
2
Views
2K
Tollbooth Willie
Tollbooth Willie
B
Marc Laidlaw releases Half-Life 2: Episode Three's plot
Replies
32
Views
39K
BabyHeadCrab
BabyHeadCrab
B
The cut missions of Half-Life: Decay
Replies
2
Views
21K
Evo
Evo
B
Community Interviews: Tony Newton, co-creator of Redemption
Replies
0
Views
5K
Barnz
B
B
Hostile Takeover, the lost Half-Life expansion pack
Replies
6
Views
16K
Ennui
Ennui
Back
Top