W4d5Y
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2006
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 1
Carmichael: Hillary votes rigged
- Thread starter W4d5Y
- Start date
Atomic_Piggy
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2006
- Messages
- 6,485
- Reaction score
- 2
/facepalm
W4d5Y
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2006
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 1
I actually read an article about this on prisonplanet, and no, I don't bloody care about what you have against Alex Jones, at least he doesn't start off wars...
If I *recall* the numbers correctly, Hitlary had an advantage of 7% over Obama's results, and this only occured on the diebold voting machines, while the odds originally were something like 49/29 for obama versus hillary to win the caucus, and even the media covered the "POLL PUZZLE", because not even CNN could figure out where the hell she just got those votes...
They believed it was because her name was placed higher on the ballots. Tss.
Prisonplanet reported one of their 'experts' even ONCE mentioned there was a possibility that the votes had been rigged...But they didn't even dare touch upon that, because nobody would cover anything that would acknowledge prisonplanet actually was right.
If I *recall* the numbers correctly, Hitlary had an advantage of 7% over Obama's results, and this only occured on the diebold voting machines, while the odds originally were something like 49/29 for obama versus hillary to win the caucus, and even the media covered the "POLL PUZZLE", because not even CNN could figure out where the hell she just got those votes...
They believed it was because her name was placed higher on the ballots. Tss.
Prisonplanet reported one of their 'experts' even ONCE mentioned there was a possibility that the votes had been rigged...But they didn't even dare touch upon that, because nobody would cover anything that would acknowledge prisonplanet actually was right.
CptStern
suckmonkey
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 10,303
- Reaction score
- 62
look there are more than a few legitimate sites that have raised the question of discrepancies between electronic ballots and the polls ..did you really have to pick the most extremeist/alarmist source to get your point across?
http://www.boston.com/news/local/ne...eptical_of_nh_ballot_count_conspiracy_theory/
http://www.boston.com/news/local/ne...eptical_of_nh_ballot_count_conspiracy_theory/
W4d5Y
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2006
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 1
Hihi, well, I just don't care to look up the internet only in a panicked effort to avoid prisonplanet, also, truthnews and all the other sites Alex owns are a standard news source for me...I like the alarmist/extremist thing about them in particular...
And who cares? The story's the same: How the hell did she get those votes and what did the diebold machines have to do with it.
And who cares? The story's the same: How the hell did she get those votes and what did the diebold machines have to do with it.
W4d5Y
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2006
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 1
Yes I did, quite interesting, I am satisfied with that explanation for now, prisonplanet only mentioned what CNN&affiliates offered as explanation...
Teehee, I could of course claim that there's only past pattern because all other democratic candidates were rigged, too
Teehee, I could of course claim that there's only past pattern because all other democratic candidates were rigged, too
W4d5Y
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2006
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 1
I was never banned, your suspicion is wrong. I chose deliberately to avoid hl2net for some time (I think this spans more than a year by now) for reasons of extreme exaustion due to the need to explain my position on anything everytime somebody comes across my "nutjob" statements.
The three phases of truth: a) ridicule b) violent opposition c) acception.
So far this place's people have not yet manage to pass section a.
I'd be delighted to here some proper opposition, instead of nutjob statements.
If you have criticism on my takes, then let me hear them.
Instead, all I get is "oh noes the nutjob is back in."
What you do the most is linking me to sites which you deem reliable in disprooving my points.
However, by this move all of you prove to me to lack any opinion on the topics I address, given that you do never treat them yourselves -.-
Remember, I might be wrong, but you don't proove it by treating my the way Galileo Galilei was treated several hundred years back, in the wake of spiritual totalitarianism executed by the catholic church.
The three phases of truth: a) ridicule b) violent opposition c) acception.
So far this place's people have not yet manage to pass section a.
I'd be delighted to here some proper opposition, instead of nutjob statements.
If you have criticism on my takes, then let me hear them.
Instead, all I get is "oh noes the nutjob is back in."
What you do the most is linking me to sites which you deem reliable in disprooving my points.
However, by this move all of you prove to me to lack any opinion on the topics I address, given that you do never treat them yourselves -.-
Remember, I might be wrong, but you don't proove it by treating my the way Galileo Galilei was treated several hundred years back, in the wake of spiritual totalitarianism executed by the catholic church.
Atomic_Piggy
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2006
- Messages
- 6,485
- Reaction score
- 2
As I recall, we destroyed all you arguements. So perhaps you should apply your "three phases of truth" to yourself.
W4d5Y
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2006
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 1
No, you did not, all you did was INSULT me for having done something you might deem wrong-doing and then link me onto other sites and leave the responsibility of disprooving me to those sites...
Anyway, before you go at the conspiracy theories, why don't you try cover the OFFICIAL account first???
I mean, after all, what explanation do you offer me?
Because I have the impression I was left alone with thinking about the whole contemporary political circumstances we face right now.
Do you believe the towers had a "hollow steel shaft" for a core, as the Kean Comission claims?
Anyway, I have every reason I could possibly imagine to assume flight 93 was shot down, whatever purpose that was done for.
Anyway, before you go at the conspiracy theories, why don't you try cover the OFFICIAL account first???
I mean, after all, what explanation do you offer me?
Because I have the impression I was left alone with thinking about the whole contemporary political circumstances we face right now.
Do you believe the towers had a "hollow steel shaft" for a core, as the Kean Comission claims?
Anyway, I have every reason I could possibly imagine to assume flight 93 was shot down, whatever purpose that was done for.
Atomic_Piggy
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2006
- Messages
- 6,485
- Reaction score
- 2
Irony...overdose...ARGH.
"The three phases of truth: a) ridicule b) violent opposition c) acception."
Ridicule: Lets ridicule the guy because he can't really be serious can he
Violent opposition: Ok lets actually argue with him since I think he's serious
Acception: So dense that we'll just accept him as he is
Ridicule: Lets ridicule the guy because he can't really be serious can he
Violent opposition: Ok lets actually argue with him since I think he's serious
Acception: So dense that we'll just accept him as he is
Kadayi
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2003
- Messages
- 6,034
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't mind the guy linking to Sources, however I think it is a mistake to take everything on board that the extremist/alarmist press throw up. For every hundred or so conspiracy laden articles there is something occasionally insightful that is covered.
