Casino Royale Teaser Released

Sweet. Ill have to watch it when i get home tho..:(
 
Now we're talking. No stupid gimmicks, just good stunts and bulldozer smashin'. The crane parts reminded me a lot of Goldeneye's cradle, which is a good thing.
 
Raziel-Jcd said:
Sweet. Ill have to watch it when i get home tho..:(
Click to expand...

I don't want any "OMG **** MR. T UP THE ASS!!1! THIS LOOKS ORGASMICALLY GOOD11!!" :p
 
Axyon said:
Now we're talking. No stupid gimmicks, just good stunts and bulldozer smashin'. The crane parts reminded me a lot of Goldeneye's cradle, which is a good thing.
Click to expand...

The whole thing felt goldeneye-i somehow. It also somehow reminded me of the motorbike/helicopter scene from tomorrow never dies, which was awesome.
 
Think your link is down, but it's all over YouTube now also.
 
MaxiKana said:
The whole thing felt goldeneye-i somehow.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure its directed by the guy who did GoldenEye :p

Looks to be the best Bond yet. Daniel Craig's the man.

And Eva Green is the woman :naughty:
 
MaxiKana said:
The whole thing felt goldeneye-i somehow. It also somehow reminded me of the motorbike/helicopter scene from tomorrow never dies, which was awesome.
Click to expand...

Same director. Hence: Best Bond film in exactly 10 years.
 
Is it me or does it look a little more...down to Earth than the latest few?
 
Harryz said:
I don't want any "OMG **** MR. T UP THE ASS!!1! THIS LOOKS ORGASMICALLY GOOD11!!" :p
Click to expand...

HOYLASDAS SIHT OMMGGG !!! THATS S LOOKSS SO GOODODL!L!!

See now when i really feel ^^that it comes out more "real" or "better" Its how you can tell if im REALLY into something.

That trailer is good and i was always going to see that movie in the 1st place, just im not dieing for it like some other things on this planet. :)
 
I'm pleasently surprised, the new Bond doesn't look like wimp and the movie itself looks a lot better than 'Die another Day' which sucked.

But what pisses me off is that two years ago, Quentin Tarantino wanted to do Casino Royale with Pierce. That would of rocked so hard:)
 
ChiChi said:
But what pisses me off is that two years ago, Quentin Tarantino wanted to do Casino Royale with Pierce. That would of rocked so hard:)
Click to expand...

As much as a I love QT, he could never make it what it is going to be... if that makes sense.
 
Finally, a Bond I can relate to. So long as they keep this one fairly believable, unlike the rubbish they've been passing off as Bond recently, this could be a damn fine film. I guess the whole thing is supposed to be very serious, and there's a lot of ceontemplation on murder and death, which makes a lot of sense in a Bond film. Here's hoping it can bring back some glory to the series.
 
****, I'm not not gay, but Daniel Craig is pretty hot. I like the look of this Bond.
It's more of a modern Bond, than a 60-70's Bond scaled to fit the standards of today, like the ones after GoldenEye.
 
Is the movie industry so freaking strapped for original material that they now have to REMAKE a freaking BOND movie? I'm so pissed. And guess what? What I think? It MATTERS.
 
Bond movies aren't all that radically different from each other, at least not enough for the difference between new and remake to matter.
 
But that's what makes it doubly insulting for me. It's not that hard to make a new Bond script, yet they're going the lazy way and doing a remake.
 
Steve, in case you haven't noticed they've been making bond movies for the last 40 years. It's called a franchise.
 
Crisis King said:
Steve, in case you haven't noticed they've been making bond movies for the last 40 years. It's called a franchise.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what you're on about, man.

I'm well aware of that.

However, up until now, they've never REMADE any.
 
AH...I get you know. Still I don't know why you're pissed, the trailer is good.
 
i am not thrilled about the new Bond...maybe because Brosnan did a half decent job...oh well not like this will stop me from seeing it. :p
 
Steve said:
I'm not sure what you're on about, man.

I'm well aware of that.

However, up until now, they've never REMADE any.
Click to expand...

Ever seen "Never say Never Again" ? Its a remake of Thunderball.
 
Steve said:
Is the movie industry so freaking strapped for original material that they now have to REMAKE a freaking BOND movie? I'm so pissed. And guess what? What I think? It MATTERS.
Click to expand...

You have actually seen the original Casino Royale film havent you? I'll put it this way - it had Woody Allen,That bloke out of the pink panther and the film about the boxer rebbelion and 1870's stlyle US cavalry. And everyone, including Bond died at the end.

Anyway, This does look good, and Bond is still going in his cycle of increasingly insanly over the top plots back down to earth. and it looks good, even if I dont like the new Bond.

And whilst the man who made the original Goldeneye film is back, the most important question remains, Will the game be as good as Goldeneye: 007? I think not...
 
looks like they got rid of the pansy judo chop to the neck move, that was the soul of the movies ;(
 
malice said:
Ever seen "Never say Never Again" ? Its a remake of Thunderball.
Click to expand...
Well, there you go. I stand corrected.
 
Steve said:
Well, there you go. I stand corrected.
Click to expand...
As Bob Marley said, Casino Royale isn't really a remake anyway. The original Casino Royale was a send up of the spy genre that took the first Bond Novel as a starting point and isn't considered to actually be a Bond movie (i.e. Cannonical).

Personally, i'm not much of a bond fan. I've seen a fair few of them due to the UK's ITV showing the whole lot of them, one or two every week though, but that's a while ago. I don't know whether my outlook on these films changed or something, but when I saw Die Another Day I felt like puking.

Props to The World is not Enough though. Had a clip from the opening sequence to comment on in an AS media exam, and I seem to remember getting full marks on that paper :p
 
Heh. "Cannonical."

CanNONical. Cannonnicall? Cannononononical.
 
Steve said:
Heh. "Cannonical."
Click to expand...
Congratulations on your postcount +1. Your point is? Everytime someone uses just one to many letters in a word, you absolutely must comment on it?
 
I believe that a Bond movie is only as good as its villians. The better the villians, the better the Bond movie.

"Goldeneye" had 4 great villians in it (all were really well developed):
Alec Trevelyan, Boris Grishenko, Xenia Onatopp, General Ourumov

"Tomorrow Never Dies" really only had 1 that I liked:
Elliot Carver

"The World Is Not Enough" had villians that weren't really likable at all. "Die Another Day" was even worse. They were all bland and rather generic.


Now hopefully the bad guys in the new film are as interesting as the first two Brosnan films. The fact that the Goldeneye director is behind Casino Royale increases the chances of this happening. :)

I'll reply on the trailer when I get a chance to watch it at home.
 
kupoartist said:
Congratulations on your postcount +1. Your point is? Everytime someone uses just one to many letters in a word, you absolutely must comment on it?
Click to expand...
Umm...he spelled the word correctly. I've just never heard "cannon" in adjective form before. I thought it was a fun word. So I said it. And then I played around with it. Lighten up, dude. We're all friends here.
 
Steve said:
Umm...he spelled the word correctly. I've just never heard "cannon" in adjective form before. I thought it was a fun word. So I said it. And then I played around with it. Lighten up, dude. We're all friends here.
Click to expand...
No, actually there's only one "n" in canon (rather than cannon which is a gun that shoots stuff). And by "he" you mean me. You WILL scold me for bad spelling!!!111 DoEs NoT CompUTe!

As far as pointless arguements that i've started go, this is probably somewhere near the middle of them.
 
LOOK man. I'm tired. I just ate like, a whole SHITLOAD of linguini and I can't see very well. Might the two be related? Not a chance.

Canonical...that gets me thinking. Is "dogmatic" a word?
 
I don't know about you guys but i am pretty dissapointed with the look of it.
Mainly the look of the new bond.I mean cmon,Daniel Craig!?!?
He just doesn't fit the role.Sure, he's a good actor and very good when it comes to playing multi-dimensional bad guys.He even plays a good anti hero(layer cake) but he just simply doesn't have a good guys look.If it was for me i would've choosen Clive Owen to play the role instead.He has the average tough and rough joe look to him and definetely looks better the Craig.Well,besides that crooked nose of his.
 
TwwIX said:
I don't know about you guys but i am pretty dissapointed with the look of it.
Mainly the look of the new bond.I mean cmon,Daniel Craig!?!?
He just doesn't fit the role.Sure, he's a good actor and very good when it comes to playing multi-dimensional bad guys.He even plays a good anti hero(layer cake) but he just simply doesn't have a good guys look.If it was for me i would've choosen Clive Owen to play the role instead.He has the average tough and rough joe look to him and definetely looks better the Craig.Well,besides that crooked nose of his.
Click to expand...
I think the important aspect here is that Craig can act. Owen couldn't act his way out of a paper bag containing magic acting juice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
From Warren Spector to Arkane Studios: Half-Life 2's cancelled Ravenholm episode
Replies
2
Views
10K
Clan Wolf 2
Clan Wolf 2
B
Half-Life's unused cutscenes
Replies
0
Views
7K
Barnz
B
MFL
Fascinating look at the ongoing psychological evolution of flat hieirarchies.
Replies
2
Views
2K
Tollbooth Willie
Tollbooth Willie
B
Community Interviews: Final Exchange development team
Replies
0
Views
5K
Barnz
B
B
Marc Laidlaw releases Half-Life 2: Episode Three's plot
Replies
32
Views
39K
BabyHeadCrab
BabyHeadCrab
Back
Top