MiccyNarc
Tank
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2004
- Messages
- 5,136
- Reaction score
- 1
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080520/pl_nm/congress_opec_dc
I guess they are. Must be an election year!
I guess they are. Must be an election year!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Actually that wouldn't be a bad idea. OPEC Is a monopoly. Treating OPEC as a monopoly through our legal system might actually do some good. However unless the next president supports the bill, whether it gets past by the president or they override the veto does not matter.
-OPEC will ignore it.
-Executive wont enforce it, because they don't support it.
or
-OPEC will ignore it.
-Executive will enforce it via military, but military needs money.
-Congress wont give money or/and American public wont support using the military.
It wont happen either way and will probably just end up causing as prices to go higher because oil companies will probably simply reduce supply even more.
Let me get this straight because from what i read that bill sounds like a good thing.