CS:S High Scores ;D

DelaZ

Spy
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
css_score.JPG


sorry for the low quality :imu:
 
Pure fun...:D Not every thread as to be bloody serious
 
No its just I have seen people with like 110 score and 6 deaths
 
Well, no they have the chance to post it over here... :)
 
Good one there! My best score in CSS so far is 36 - 0. As soon as I checked my scores I ended up on 40 - 10 :) Guess I couldn't take the pressure. I usually play better when I don't look at the scoreboard for a long time.
 
Nex321 said:
No its just I have seen people with like 110 score and 6 deaths

hmmm, i wonder which noob-wpn-of-choice he used?????




































hint: possibly awp...duh
 
How can people play games with no antialiasing in this day and age is beyond me :p
 
lePobz said:
How can people play games with no antialiasing in this day and age is beyond me :p

Because when we are fragging we are focussing on the target, not on how everything looks?
 
Nex321 said:
and the point of this thread is.....?

quit being such a party pooper and go to some other thread... gah i hate people like you

-merc
 
Diablo2k said:
Because when we are fragging we are focussing on the target, not on how everything looks?

with higher resoultions and detail, enemies are more easily spotted. not to mention with a better video card framerates are more constant at these high reses
 
poseyjmac said:
with higher resoultions and detail, enemies are more easily spotted. not to mention with a better video card framerates are more constant at these high reses


yeah but not every 1 is willing to shell out a sh!tload of money for a video card thatll be outdated in a year.

cs:s isnt quite worth 4 - 500 bux just to get a better looking res and a better fps. its just a game to me, but others can waste their money as they choose.

oh and best score is prolly about 35 - 9 ish.
 
Carnage_333 said:
yeah but not every 1 is willing to shell out a sh!tload of money for a video card thatll be outdated in a year.

cs:s isnt quite worth 4 - 500 bux just to get a better looking res and a better fps. its just a game to me, but others can waste their money as they choose.

oh and best score is prolly about 35 - 9 ish.

CS:S alone might not be. but for all the game coming out in the near future, it definately is.
 
poseyjmac said:
CS:S alone might not be. but for all the game coming out in the near future, it definately is.


nah i think ill just wait a few months for the 9800 pro to come down around 250 bucks (aus). :)
 
Nice dude. Very nice.
I was playing DoD once and this guy got 102-5 Not shit
 
Mikademius said:
I recon you started on the T- team. Not CT :)
or he is one of those who make no attempt to defuse the bomb...ya never know
 
I was just doing a calculation, because CT's won 5 times and with 6 terrors that dosn't come up to 50 even if he nailed the whole team every single round, which he didn't :) I guess he was on the superior T team and switched to the CT team to look good... Witch is kind of lame..
 
scubuh? CS:S is a team game right... *sigh* kill hogger's. :p
 
Mikademius said:
I was just doing a calculation, because CT's won 5 times and with 6 terrors that dosn't come up to 50 even if he nailed the whole team every single round, which he didn't :) I guess he was on the superior T team and switched to the CT team to look good... Witch is kind of lame..

Not only that but it looks like they were all nubs on that server.
 
So I guess we all could get 50- 5 there if we played the cards right ;)
 
Mikademius said:
I was just doing a calculation, because CT's won 5 times and with 6 terrors that dosn't come up to 50 even if he nailed the whole team every single round, which he didn't :) I guess he was on the superior T team and switched to the CT team to look good... Witch is kind of lame..
hahhaha :LOL:
 
Mikademius said:
I was just doing a calculation, because CT's won 5 times and with 6 terrors that dosn't come up to 50 even if he nailed the whole team every single round, which he didn't :) I guess he was on the superior T team and switched to the CT team to look good... Witch is kind of lame..

Lol no, I joined the CT team when i had something like 40 kills cause the teams were far to unbalanced :)
 
DelaZ said:
Lol no, I joined the CT team when i had something like 40 kills cause the teams were far to unbalanced :)
Fair enough...
But did it really take 40 frags for you to realize the teams were that uneven. I mean. Look at the CT's individual deathcount ;)
 
oooh a whole thread devoted to statwhoring.whoopdee ***** doo.

i see you're 50/5 your team is losing 17/5 so i assume you were stacking the other team and whupping up on some scrubs then you switched over to the ct's after T's won 12 straight rounds then you got owned 5 rounds in a row by your former teammates. yeah you should be real proud. happy to be having a high score vs a team of guys with 1:6 ratios. lol i bet i could beat you with no mouse and no jump button.
 
poseyjmac said:
with higher resoultions and detail, enemies are more easily spotted. not to mention with a better video card framerates are more constant at these high reses

This isnt playstation mofo, we arent playing on 35 inch screens with 640x480 resolution. were playing in 1024x768 or higher on a .23 dp or less, 17 -21 inch monitor thats less than 5 feet away from our faces. if you are getting all pissed off about not having AA on in games and using it as a detriment to your gameplaying experience then you are either playing crap games and need an excuse to justify your purchase of crap or you are what we refer to as a graphics whore. i mean reall what is a few tiny zigs here and there gonna take away from when im playing a fast action game? am i gonna die faster because the lines on my gun and super smooth? did the jagginess of the edge of the ceiling stretching off into the z-plane while you were getting shot keep you from shooting back? i mean come the hell on.
 
meh, try keeping that score when your playing with 32 people and not 12.
 
John Romero said:
This isnt playstation mofo, we arent playing on 35 inch screens with 640x480 resolution. were playing in 1024x768 or higher on a .23 dp or less, 17 -21 inch monitor thats less than 5 feet away from our faces. if you are getting all pissed off about not having AA on in games and using it as a detriment to your gameplaying experience then you are either playing crap games and need an excuse to justify your purchase of crap or you are what we refer to as a graphics whore. i mean reall what is a few tiny zigs here and there gonna take away from when im playing a fast action game? am i gonna die faster because the lines on my gun and super smooth? did the jagginess of the edge of the ceiling stretching off into the z-plane while you were getting shot keep you from shooting back? i mean come the hell on.

hehe. gotta agree with you there. I don't use heavy settings on my computer, even though I built it last week, but I don't think the graphic quality is worth the fps-loss on such a badly optimised engine as source. I

play just as well without AA and AF if not better.
 
My highest scores are 107-20 and 88-14. They're not my best, but they're certainly my highest.

An average game for me is, like, 45-15, give or take a few kills or deaths. :cheers:
 
In a game of CS both teams start opposing each other. So for the most part you can guess where the enemy will pop up. Now imagine a CS match with no teams and random spawn locations and weapon pick up locations.

Scores would be a lot different then thats for sure.
 
Mikademius said:
Fair enough...
But did it really take 40 frags for you to realize the teams were that uneven. I mean. Look at the CT's individual deathcount ;)

Yeah, but it's just a game lol... I was having fun, more then anything :) Then suddenly I joined the CT for more challenge... But I made most of the kills when I was on the T site :) Thats were I started... The 5 rounds won by the CT were because of me :D
 
Back
Top