Delays In Bolton Appointment

[kmack]

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7573964/

It is a blow to the White House and its chances of getting John Bolton confirmed — because any delay will stall the momentum and potentially raise problems.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4951877,00.html

Senators considering John R. Bolton's nomination to be U.N. ambassador have asked to interview former deputy CIA director John McLaughlin and two other high-ranking intelligence officials about possible Bolton efforts to transfer an analyst who had tangled with him,

good.

the fact that some republicans are rethinking their backings gives me a glimmer of hope that politics may not be ENTIRELY based on party lines. Of course the bush administration can't have that :|

 

[Korgoth]

All that should change by weeks end though. Bush wants this guy, he is going to get this guy, and it wouldn't matter if the pope himself told him no... ( the last one tried for iraq) its still going to happen. They can delay it a while, but not shut it down.

 

[kmack]

All that should change by weeks end though. Bush wants this guy, he is going to get this guy, and it wouldn't matter if the pope himself told him no... ( the last one tried for iraq) its still going to happen. They can delay it a while, but not shut it down.

but the pope and bush love life! they are pretty much the same person!

except whenit involves retarted wars and the death penalty :|

 

[Gray Fox]

I don't like Bush, but the pope had more bloog on his hands.

 

[kmack]

I don't like Bush, but the pope had more blood on his hands.

I dont understand what you mean?

oh, and more stuff is comin up to block this guy, keep your fingers crossed.