Display Card, again

bbson john

Tank
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
3,292
Reaction score
3
Which graphic card can help my computer runs hl2 episodes, with HDR, highest graphic quality on, extremely smoothly? I want a fast card, not money-saving card.
 
The top 3 absolute most powerful cards out there right now are the Geforce 7950GX2, Radeon X1900XTX, and Geforce 7900GTX. All 3 should chew up any Source game out right now without any problems.

But if you want "bang for your buck" get a 7900GT.
 
Bleeding-edge means the absolute highest. But don't get a 7800 series like that article suggests. The 7900 series cards are cheaper, more powerful, consume less power, and produce less heat.
 
augh are we going to have a nvidia vs ati fight again?
 
ATi is traditionally stronger with Source games. 7900GT is the best value card available now though, IMO.
 
giant384 said:
ati vs nvidia in a source game is barely noticable
QFT....
in the days of the ati 9800 and the nvidia FX seriest this was true, but alas, not anymore...
go ATI or Nvidia, whatever suites your taste.
 
giant384 said:
augh are we going to have a nvidia vs ati fight again?

lmao, that's a smart thing to say.....

someone gives there vote for nvidia, someone else gives a vote for ati, oh noes, i see a fanboy war ?!

er, no.
 
The absoulute most powerful card you can get is the SLI (or whatever ATI calls it) version of the X1900XTX
 
its called Crossfire....oh man, ATI should create the xfire version of 1900 xtx. its gonna be a pwnage card!
 
In what aspect ATi is better then GForece? Which one is normally cheaper?
 
Just get Ither one, one thats cheapest for you, you'll be fine
 
In what aspect ATi is better then GForece? Which one is normally cheaper?

I believe that ATI cards can do HDR and AntiAliasing at the same time, but the benchmarks are similar to nvidia cards. either cards would do, doesn really matter, as long as u get a cheap and durable card.
 
how is ati better that nvidia? and go for the 7900, 7950 looks more like a proffesianol desighners card, unless your going for quad sli
 
who really cares about hdr + aa if you play at 1280x1024 + you dont really need aa
 
It is still something. The fact that ATI has 2 seperate buffers, one for AA and another for HDR.

Another thing ATI is going to do better? ATI's Dx10 card will have shaders that act as both pixel\vertex. Nvidia will have set Pixel\Vertex shaders. Therefor as long as ATI can make there card faster, they will easily beat Nvidia's card. Because a developer could easily just set up the same amount of shaders as Nvidia's card and if the card is faster they would achieve better results.
 
Minerel said:
It is still something. The fact that ATI has 2 seperate buffers, one for AA and another for HDR.

Another thing ATI is going to do better? ATI's Dx10 card will have shaders that act as both pixel\vertex. Nvidia will have set Pixel\Vertex shaders. Therefor as long as ATI can make there card faster, they will easily beat Nvidia's card. Because a developer could easily just set up the same amount of shaders as Nvidia's card and if the card is faster they would achieve better results.

well i prefer nvidia over ati mainly because they run cooler and use less power ,but i do know about the unified shaders for the ati and it will do well but they are not out yet
 
I have a 7900GT and it works very good.......cheap too
 
Back
Top