theotherguy
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2003
- Messages
- 5,107
- Reaction score
- 1
We started studying nuclear chemistry today in school, and we started it off by watching the famous 1951 american propaganda film "duck and cover", which stated that you could easily survive a nuclear bomb by hiding under desks or against walls. "even a newspaper could provide adequate protection against harmful radiation"
now compare that statement with these videos:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4931777426137335169&q=\power+of+nuclear
this is a compilation of footage from many of the nuclear tests made during the 40s-70s that shows the true power of nukes.
Were we really that naiive in 1951, or was it just the government trying to reassure us that a threat was small? I mean, most people inside the blast zone at hiroshima were vaporized, and the rest were either incinerated or killed by falling debris. the further out you got, you would see more survivors but with severe burns and radiation poisining that would kill them within weeks. even people far away from the bomb were killed by cancers. Why would the government put out such a naiive and idiotic message?
just a few thoughts.
now compare that statement with these videos:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4931777426137335169&q=\power+of+nuclear
this is a compilation of footage from many of the nuclear tests made during the 40s-70s that shows the true power of nukes.
Were we really that naiive in 1951, or was it just the government trying to reassure us that a threat was small? I mean, most people inside the blast zone at hiroshima were vaporized, and the rest were either incinerated or killed by falling debris. the further out you got, you would see more survivors but with severe burns and radiation poisining that would kill them within weeks. even people far away from the bomb were killed by cancers. Why would the government put out such a naiive and idiotic message?
just a few thoughts.