everything thats wrong with this game

[rabiddoguk]

1.bayonet's should be an equibable item to the garand and vice versa.

2. in the real world if i was at war he who spots his enemy first is sure to be the victor, in many situation on the game i spot someone befor they see and before they even realise i have already started unloading shit loads into them but no they dont die they have all the time in the world it seems to stand there back to me taking all these hits and turn through 180 to face me ands shoots me dead with a couple of shoots. thats ****ed up.

3.the issues with point two clearly indicates that the smgs are far to inaccurate and far to weak. they need to seriously revise how the weapons work and balance them out.

4.pistols are about as accurate as trying to take a piss with a hard-on even though ur aiming at the hole.

5.LAG wots up with that shit, is it a shitty net code for the game?

6.****ing numpty's that just stand in front or behind you and get you the **** killed.

7.same as what another lad stated in a different thread, when im getting shot the **** up the nugget casualy lays down.

8.mg's are good and could be better i mean seriously there is no reason y you couldnt crawl with your gun deployed.

9.is war more or less tactical than anti terrorism like css, our survey says,NO. so why the **** should we always have to put ourselfs right in the shit, give us a frigging lean with q and e. and when any class is prone let is roll left and right.



this game could have been so much better. they have released it with loads of flaws and we all parted with $20. sort it out.:flame:

 

[hungryduck]

Well, let me be the first to say, your just one pissed off dumbass who probably just smashed his keyboard in anger cause you just sucked it up at DoD. Calm down. Half your post makes no sense anyway, and sounds like its written by a first class idiot.

in the real world if i was at war he who spots his enemy first is sure to be the victor, in many situation on the game i spot someone befor they see and before they even realise i have already started unloading shit loads into them but no they dont die they have all the time in the world it seems to stand there back to me taking all these hits and turn through 180 to face me ands shoots me dead with a couple of shoots. thats ****ed up.

what?

is war more or less tactical than anti terrorism like css, our survey says,NO. so why the **** should we always have to put ourselfs right in the shit, give us a frigging lean with q and e. and when any class is prone let is roll left and right.

what?

go away.

 

[DiSTuRbEd]

Nice rant, most of the points are wrong, but you seem to think you are right, so I'll just leave it at that.

 

[Angry Lawyer]

"Numpty" is now word of the week.

-Angry Lawyer

 

[Dalamari]

Smg's are less accurate you ****nut, semi-automatic pistols are also hard to be accurate with, maybe you should actually shoot a gun instead of getting your info from CoD and Saving Private Ryan

****ing sack of ****

 

[Angry Lawyer]

Where **** = "Numpy".

-Angry Lawyer

 

[Pi Mu Rho]

Let's take a quick look, boys and girls, at how this aspect of game development works.

1)Developers create a game. They set the gameplay and balance it according to their own vision.

2) One group of players (let's call them A) think that gun x is too weak/strong, etc

3) Another group of players (let's call them B) think the opposite to Group A

4) Developer looks at comments from Group A and Group B

What does the developer do?

5) Developer makes up their own goddamn mind and balance it the way they think it ought to be.

 

[Bait]

1.bayonet's should be an equibable item to the garand and vice versa.

That's awesome.

 

[TheSomeone]

3.the issues with point two clearly indicates that the smgs are far to inaccurate and far to weak. they need to seriously revise how the weapons work and balance them out.

Everyone is saying the opposite.

5.LAG wots up with that shit, is it a shitty net code for the game?

Haven't experience any whatsoever.

9.is war more or less tactical than anti terrorism like css, our survey says,NO. so why the **** should we always have to put ourselfs right in the shit, give us a frigging lean with q and e. and when any class is prone let is roll left and right.

Is this war? No. Go take your helmet and whine somewhere else.

 

[Synthos]

i agree only that garandes should be able to have a bayonet you can "affix"

other than that, all the problems you're getting are based on your connection speed.
If the other person is shooting you even though you're already shooting at him, chances are he's probably already shooting at you too.. His connection is faster, and/or his reaction times are faster.

You suck, your connection sucks. DEAL WITH IT. People are good it this game for a reason. I know people way better than me, and I'm better than most.

If you want to get better, don't rant your shit on the forums; make suggestions (like the bayonet affix). Get a better internet connection, drink a lotta coffee and GET INTO THE GAME, like really into. Play some web games that test reaction speed. I really immerse myself in the game and my reaction times are much better

 

[destrukt]

there is a strong difference between what people want in a game, and what is wrong with the game.

1. that's a possibility, but i'm sure there are tons of possibilities for other guns.

2. so you suck, or a person simply gets lucky, BAD LUCK.

3. they are fine, learn to use them properly.

4. pistols are also fine, also, learn to use them. by your anology, you sound like an angry 13 year old.

5. no lag for me, go find a good server or get a new connection.

6. now, this is just stupid, blaming a game for the people playing it.

7. what are you trying to say ? you sound like an idiot by the way.

8. mg's are incredibly good already, seriously.

9. i think you might want to play something like rainbow six 3 or another game which is about tactics. also, because you want features and a game lacks them, doesn't make the game 'bad.'


seriously, go get a clue. you think a game is bad simply because you can't use guns properly, you have had bad experiences with other people in the game, you don't have a decent connection, lack the simple ability to find a non-lagging server or can't optimise some simple console commands.

i'm repeating some things others have said, but you seem kind of thick.

 

[operative x]

Smg's are less accurate you ****nut, semi-automatic pistols are also hard to be accurate with, maybe you should actually shoot a gun instead of getting your info from CoD and Saving Private Ryan

****ing sack of ****

I've only had one firing session with a springfield .45 pistol once at a firing range and even my aim was FAR better.

 

[Pi Mu Rho]

It's a game, not a simulation.

 

[bliink]

1.bayonet's should be an equibable item to the garand and vice versa.

That would go against game balance

2. in the real world if i was at war he who spots his enemy first is sure to be the victor, in many situation on the game i spot someone befor they see and before they even realise i have already started unloading shit loads into them but no they dont die they have all the time in the world it seems to stand there back to me taking all these hits and turn through 180 to face me ands shoots me dead with a couple of shoots. thats ****ed up.

This is a computer game. Also, your point is completely and utterly wrong.

3.the issues with point two clearly indicates that the smgs are far to inaccurate and far to weak. they need to seriously revise how the weapons work and balance them out.

ok, you complain about a lack of realism in point two, then in point three, you want to reduce realism?

4.pistols are about as accurate as trying to take a piss with a hard-on even though ur aiming at the hole.

Thats because they're not primary weapons, and you're not supposed to be able to snipe accross the map with them

5.LAG wots up with that shit, is it a shitty net code for the game?

no, its a shitty net connection from the client

6.****ing numpty's that just stand in front or behind you and get you the **** killed.

maybe you shouldnt be ramming yourself into crowds of players then.

7.same as what another lad stated in a different thread, when im getting shot the **** up the nugget casualy lays down.

if he dropped faster, you'd complain that as soon as you shoot at people, they instantly hit the deck and you cant shoot them.

8.mg's are good and could be better i mean seriously there is no reason y you couldnt crawl with your gun deployed.

because those players would become killing machines and ruin the game for everyone?

9.is war more or less tactical than anti terrorism like css, our survey says,NO. so why the **** should we always have to put ourselfs right in the shit, give us a frigging lean with q and e. and when any class is prone let is roll left and right.

ok, you think DOD is LESS tactical, so you want leaning, and commando rolls?

this game could have been so much better. they have released it with loads of flaws and we all parted with $20. sort it out.:flame:

more like flawed users. Everyone else seems to enjoy it fine.

 

[Synthos]

this guy's gotten ripped apart.. I doubt we'll be seeing him reply

 

[Beerdude26]

Another Bliinkowned

 

[Reaktor4]

Everyone else seems to enjoy it fine.

Not really. I also think the game is shit. Mainly because of how clunky it is.

 

[sinkoman]

Wow, some people on this world are just really ****ing stupid.

Why couldn't you crawl with an MG deployed?

Because the Bipod is embedded into the ground.

You'd rather he just sets the bipod down?

Then say goodbye to accuracy.

 

[bliink]

Not really. I also think the game is shit. Mainly because of how clunky it is.

When I said "everyone" I meant as in the statistical "everyone".

Noone counts hundredths of a percent that often

 

[DreadLord]

1.bayonet's should be an equibable item to the garand and vice versa.

I'm sorry lol.. but vice versa? So you want the bayonet to be equipable to the garand, and the garand equipable to the bayonet?


SURE! I'LL TAKE A BAYONET! AND ATTATCH A GARAND TO IT!

 

[Mechagodzilla]

is war more or less tactical than anti terrorism like css, our survey says,NO

I found this to be pretty damn funny.

Question (choose A or B):

War is...
A) more tactical than Counter-Strike.
B) less tactical than Counter-Strike.

Answer:

NO

 

[sinkoman]

I found this to be pretty damn funny.

Question (choose A or B):

War is...
A) more tactical than Counter-Strike.
B) less tactical than Counter-Strike.

Answer:

NO

AHAHAHAH!

That's pure gold!