golden_fang
Newbie
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
- Messages
- 245
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You'd be stupid not to believe that Iran supports the insurgency. So what? We have supported plenty of terrorists in our time to get what we wanted. Remember Al Queda? Yup, they exist thanks to us.
Oh, well I guess that makes everything hunky dory then. It's all fair! Who cares if Iran is contributing to the bloodshed and undermining the peace process now. We've done shady stuff too, and now it's their turn!
I would really like it if discussions about nukes, religion, or support of terrorism in the Middle East didn't always devolve to comparisons to the United States. That would make my day, I think.
That's not the point. Iran is looking out for their interests, just like we are looking out for ours, and just like Saudi Arabia is looking out for theirs. This has been happening for ages, it has nothing to do with right, wrong, good, or evil. It has to do with military strategy and Iran's military would be idiotic to not take advantage of what is going on in Iraq.
you're overreacting absinthe with the "blame america" defense ..No Limit has a valid point: why is it ok for the US to support terrorism yet not Iran? it's hypocritical to accuse your enemy of doing something you yourself participate in
no one is precluding anyone from criticising Iran or any other country
Since when do I support terrorism, Stern? Give me a quote or a source before you start lumping me in a camp that advocates fuddled foreign policy.
Watch who you target.
Bull-effin-crap. Any time somebody does criticize Iran, the discussion gets cockblocked by the very thing taking place in this topic: A diversion into criticism of the United States or some other comparable "evil".
You may not be explicitly barring criticism of Middle Eastern countries, but you accomplish the same nonetheless with these freakin' tangents.
The fact is that despite the evidence of Iran being involved with the Iraqi insurgency, a lot of people still view the idea as contentious.
The topic addresses this specific issue and it's just getting warped into a bloated circle-jerk where everybody can critique America even though that happens enough every other day on this forum.
Consider the quota exceeded.
Well, when X happens to be Iraq and Y happens to be just two years ago, I think it becomes a relevant counter argument. Iran is supporting terrorist agendas as it always has. But it's not the only country, or for that matter one of few countries to do this. Funding or supporting terrorist/separatist groups is something many governments do.I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that it's because when the left has nothing to say, they use the moral equivalence card, also known as, "Yeah, but America also did X back in Y".
In part, I have to agree with Absinthe and Nemesis (gasp!) here - at least a little, because of course America's foreign policy is directly responsible for the mess that has provoked this facet of Iran's foreign policy. But we're all very aware of America's misdemeanors already; in fact, I'd say most people are more aware of America's constant engagement with terrorism than of Iran's. It's the latter country being talked about and criticised, not the former.
That said, it is being criticised for its involvement in the Iraq war. In some ways it's apt to say "well, look who got us into that whole quagmire in the first place."
Nemesis said:I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that it's because when the left has nothing to say, they use the moral equivalence card, also known as, "Yeah, but America also did X back in Y".