Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Only new to realtime (DX9) been around in pre-rendered stuff for a few years now.Sp00fman said:Looks realistic, nice work.
Btw, is HDR a new thing or is it only new in game engines?
MaxiKana said:Wow nice NSPIRE... could you tell me the name of the font used in that pic?
no a HDRI just has more bits than a regular image. Eg: what looks pure white in a regular image ( R255 G255 B255 ) is pure white. In a HDR image looks pure white but could be quite a few levels brighter, display devices aren't HDR so all we see is the brightest and darkest RGB colors which is why a HDR image looks, from our point of view exactly the same as a normal image.NSPIRE said:Lol, I should practice by makin' a bowling ball . O0o0o, GOOD IDEA... I should make one like Genene Geroffolo's (spelling? ) character had in that movie 'Mystery Men'. Like how her ball was clear, with a skull in the middle and it like glowed and changed colors... that'd be sweet!
HDR by the way stands for High Dynamic Range, which is a type of rendering, etc. that uses it's surrounding picture(s), often referred to as a lightprobe, or an HDRI (High Dynamic Range Image), which lights the scene with actual values of light and dark. HDRI's (yes, the actual images) are what make all this happen. They're not easy to get, or to come by because they store way more information in the image file than regular BMP's, or anything else do. The information, like mentioned above is extremely detailed info. on where exactly (and how, also) the lights and shadows from the picture should reflect, refract, etc. all of the different objects that are placed in the scene(s).
Whew, sorry... that was more long-winded than I thought it would be. If feel like ya' wanna' read any more on stuff like that, just ask. I've got quite a few of the best links to the main / good HDR/HDRI sites out there.
heh thanksNSPIRE said:That's pretty much what I said Fenny-boi . More information can translate into more bits, hehe.
Nice explanation, too man. I really respect you; all your posts are so informative and well thought-out. You're pretty damned smart, too.
Oh, by the way, that font is called 'Tsunami.' I'm not sure, but if it's ok with the mods, I'm pretty sure I'm able to post it up here. Just as long I don't take credit, or try to redistribute it by selling it, lol. Mods?
Fenric1138 said:no a HDRI just has more bits than a regular image. Eg: what looks pure white in a regular image ( R255 G255 B255 ) is pure white. In a HDR image looks pure white but could be quite a few levels brighter, display devices aren't HDR so all we see is the brightest and darkest RGB colors which is why a HDR image looks, from our point of view exactly the same as a normal image.
So you could have a HDRI of the sun, on a monitor it wouldnt burn/damage your eyes, on a HDRI monitor it would, just like looking at the real thing would. So visually there's no difference right now to us as display devices don't recognise the extra bits (which is a good thing really or we could all be suffering from blindness if some prat didn't know what they were doing with creating a HDRI image ), internally with a 3D app such as lightwave, XSI, the source engine etc. they recognises the extra levels of brightness/exposure and makes use of them. So a HDRI 360 degree image of a room will light a 3D model version more realistically than a regular 360 degree image of the same room.
Incidently, IIRC Lightwave was the first 3D app to make use of luminosity values higher than 100%, I think Meni was the guy who first suggested it to Newtek. Which I believe was the early form of HDR, as far as 3D apps were concerned anyway. Course I could be wrong, Pixar have a habit of claiming techniques were in their Renderman software first
Fenric1138 said:heh thanks
information, bits. It's all data right
-
about the font.. well I'm cool with it, unless the author has specifically asked users don't do that with it. Otherwise I don't see there being a problem, tis a cool font afterall
Just drag and drop the font on the \winnt\fonts dir and it installs it properly.NSPIRE said:Hmm, well are ya' adding them to C:\WINDOWS or C:\WINDOWS\Fonts?
If that doesn't work, post back.
NSPIRE said:Renderman software was pretty impressive, and still is. It's still growin' and all, isn't it? I haven't checked it out in quite a while... :afro:
Ill try that, thanks.Fenric1138 said:Just drag and drop the font on the \winnt\fonts dir and it installs it properly.
MaxiKana said:Ill try that, thanks.
Your cheapest option for getting hold of Lightwave is to buy an older version, but check you can upgrade it to a recent version. Which is simply a case of contacting Newtek and giving them the sellers details, if their not in Newtek's database, its a cracked copy, if they are then they are a great bunch and will probably work out a good option for you with an upgrade to LW7.5 or LW8 when it arrives. Depending on your luck, expect to be spending between $400 - $1,000 for Lightwave itself, then thousands for the plugins to turn it into a godlike application. I recommend, well actually I order you to buy ALL Worley plugins and ALL evasion3D plugins. Not cause I know them but cause their plugins simply rock and no serious LW user will be without them. Also get Vertibevel. From there get hold of as many of the freebie plugins and Lscripts you can find for it, they all make a big difference, even the tiny ones that don't seem much. I'd also suggest Dynamic Realities' Napalm and Impact. Get hold of Lightnet Justice build (free and legit) and sort out a bunch of computers for a render farm, don't worry, Lightwave's netrender, screamernet is free to use across a network with just the one licence of the program, unlike Mental Ray which is expensive, believe me on that lol.Fender357 said:Is Lightwave 7.5 hella expensive? (thats right I said hella) I'd love to learn how to do that kind of stuff. But I can't get those super good programs to do it in And the XSI demo just confused me because not all of it works....
Brian Damage said:Wait, so am I right in thinking that HDR takes light intensity into account? Or more so?
Fenric1138 said:Your cheapest option for getting hold of Lightwave is to buy an older version, but check you can upgrade it to a recent version. Which is simply a case of contacting Newtek and giving them the sellers details, if their not in Newtek's database, its a cracked copy, if they are then they are a great bunch and will probably work out a good option for you with an upgrade to LW7.5 or LW8 when it arrives. Depending on your luck, expect to be spending between $400 - $1,000 for Lightwave itself, then thousands for the plugins to turn it into a godlike application. I recommend, well actually I order you to buy ALL Worley plugins and ALL evasion3D plugins. Not cause I know them but cause their plugins simply rock and no serious LW user will be without them. Also get Vertibevel. From there get hold of as many of the freebie plugins and Lscripts you can find for it, they all make a big difference, even the tiny ones that don't seem much. I'd also suggest Dynamic Realities' Napalm and Impact. Get hold of Lightnet Justice build (free and legit) and sort out a bunch of computers for a render farm, don't worry, Lightwave's netrender, screamernet is free to use across a network with just the one licence of the program, unlike Mental Ray which is expensive, believe me on that lol.
Do that and you should be sorted.. So yeah, you best be serious before you do, its an expensive hobby, but if your good and spend years at it, it can make you a LOT of money *grins* and if you do it as a job and your damn good at it, most of the above pays for itself in one single job.
You can pick up legit copies of LW4 (PC) for next to nothing these days on ebay, you just need to make sure their on the level and that you can upgrade them, otherwise you'll be stuck, though even the oldest versions of LW can still do great things, we didn't have any fancy features back in the days of version 3 on the amiga, heck lens flares were still a novelty, and we managed to do all sorts, so even an old version of lightwave is still mighty powerful.Fender357 said:Well............I'd love to do that.............but I'm poor. Mabie one day..........when I'm a rich ass hole ;(
fishymumma said:just h4x0r it. i dont see a probly if you only want to lean how to use it. not as if you will be making any money from the program