Fox"news": photography has a liberal bias

They didn't make her look cosmopolitan enough.
 
Hick.



Its really the only word that need saying.

In those four simple letters put together in that order, you can describe, explain and criticize everything about her.
 
I thought Fox News had hit rock bottom so many times, but the bottom must be sinking further down, because this is just pathetic.
 
I actually agree that it's dumb they didn't touch up the facial hair (be it anyone on the cover). But the fact that it's news and with 2 people debating it is...yeah. Why I don't watch fox.
 
Reality has a liberal bias.
 
Unfair? It looks fine. What crack have they been smoking? They have no obligation to alter any photo they take.

"Any respectable magazine should be doing a little retouching."

Ah no they are free to do as they wish to generate more monies. They are a business it's their perogative to make a little noise. Fox is a business it's their perogative to bitch about things smarter businesses do to make noise.
 
As usual she looks adorable and as usual someone found a way to complain about it.
 
The Monkey said:
I thought Fox News had hit rock bottom so many times, but the bottom must be sinking further down, because this is just pathetic.
Click to expand...

This. I mean, I've said it before, but THIS is what they spend their time doing???
 
Sooner or later all they're going to be able to get news on is the Special Olympics.
 
Slow news day much? The argument is totally pointless without knowing whether or not Newsweek regularly photoshops the people on their covers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top