Funny how the left acts when the shoe is on the other foot...

What the **** does this have to do with the left?

It looks to me like you're just trying to find a way to attack a group you don't particularly like. :rolleyes:
 
What makes it even funnier is the fact that it isn't some outside activist group causing it (which is normally the case). The school is basically telling its students that it can't continue without allowing men.
 
Absinthe said:
What the **** does this have to do with the left?

It looks to me like you're just trying to find a way to attack a group you don't particularly like. :rolleyes:

Really? I need to explain it?

Historically, the left has been on a mission to undo all of the cultural institutions that this country had that was based on or around the white christian heterosexual male or any combination thereof. In that pursuit they foced many all-male schools such as the Citadel to allow women.

Here, we have an all-girl school that realizes for financial reasons they need to increase their tuition base. Notice, this all-girl school hasn't been singled out by anyone on the left for being sexist. Now, since the school decided to let men enroll, the female students are ticked. These female students are normally the recipient of the various moves by the left that supposedly help create "equality". Here is a case where the school itself is doing away with a sexist enrollment policy (based on the left's definition) to help stay alive and the female student body is ticked. You see the hypocisy of the left's argument about "equality"?
 
Nope. Then again, I'm tired, so maybe I'm just not understanding you.

But I'm not seeing anything to support what you're saying. The article says nothing about the left/right or any political group. All you're giving is conjecture. You've also managed to spin it into a smear of the left, even though there was pretty much nothing to base it off of.
 
nib said:
Really? I need to explain it?

Historically, the left has been on a mission to undo all of the cultural institutions that this country had that was based on or around the white christian heterosexual male or any combination thereof. In that pursuit they foced many all-male schools such as the Citadel to allow women.

Here, we have an all-girl school that realizes for financial reasons they need to increase their tuition base. Notice, this all-girl school hasn't been singled out by anyone on the left for being sexist. Now, since the school decided to let men enroll, the female students are ticked. These female students are normally the recipient of the various moves by the left that supposedly help create "equality". Here is a case where the school itself is doing away with a sexist enrollment policy (based on the left's definition) to help stay alive and the female student body is ticked. You see the hypocisy of the left's argument about "equality"?
No I do not see the "hypocisy"...
Nor do I see how this is a leftist agenda. As a matter of fact, it was the left that pushed for women's entrance in higher education. This seems like a college's choice for financial reason. I see no politics in this.
 
Wait... a college not being able to afford to exist because it only allows women and, thus, having to allow men to enroll in order to survive... is somehow the fault of liberals? If the government or lobbyists coerced them into enrolling men you could say they caved to pressure from liberals... but that's not the case. How does the current student population (who chose that school because of the female-only rule) complaining about a change in the school's traditions have anything to do with political bias?

I guess it could indirectly be blamed on liberals if you really want to stretch it, because most college-aged people (especially women) lean to the left... so, if there aren't enough students enrolling it probably (based on statistics) means that most of the lost money would be attributed to the lower number of liberals enrolling (even if conservatives enroll in proportionately low numbers).
 
You guys are missing the point. I guess with this being a political forum making comment "tongue-in-cheek" is kinda risky.

In a nutshell, my "tongue-in-cheek" point was this. Shouldn't that college have already accepted men? Shouldn't there have been an outrage by the left groups like the ACLU for the exclusion of men on campus? Shouldn't there have been lawsuits and protests due to the inequality of the admission policies?

Personally, I don't have a problem with segregated schools based on sex, I think it can be a great thing. But, generally speaking, the left doesn't see it that way...unless it is an all female school, then it is ok.

But, again, I was being fairly light-hearted with this post. :D
 
Well you got to remeber that most of these people are real young and dont have any idea about the Citadel.I agree with you totally.
 
nib said:
In a nutshell, my "tongue-in-cheek" point was this. Shouldn't that college have already accepted men? Shouldn't there have been an outrage by the left groups like the ACLU for the exclusion of men on campus? Shouldn't there have been lawsuits and protests due to the inequality of the admission policies?
You're right, the left should get pissed off about this, but whenever men are excluded (and women are not), nobody seems to want to touch it. Double standards piss me off.
 
Absinthe said:
What the **** does this have to do with the left?

It looks to me like you're just trying to find a way to attack a group you don't particularly like. :rolleyes:
I agree.

By the way, Absinthe, you have 1234 posts :D
 
Absinthe said:
What the **** does this have to do with the left?

It looks to me like you're just trying to find a way to attack a group you don't particularly like. :rolleyes:


Like Americans?
 
Ok, the real reason I'm mad about this article is this quote:

"We all leave our doors unlocked. We can run around in our nighties. It's all girls and we feel really safe and that will change," said student Starbuck Hersey.

Running around in their nighties? I want to be a apart of that damnit!!! :devil:
 
Starbuck Hersey?


come on! that sounds so made up!

btw how do you figure it has anything to do with people who lean to the political left? it just sounds like a bunch of women pissed that their club will be open to the opposite sex ..big deal
 
"We all leave our doors unlocked. We can run around in our nighties. It's all girls and we feel really safe and that will change," said student Starbuck Hersey.
See...that doesn't make any sense. Aren't they worried about lesbians?
 
nib said:
You guys are missing the point. I guess with this being a political forum making comment "tongue-in-cheek" is kinda risky.

In a nutshell, my "tongue-in-cheek" point was this. Shouldn't that college have already accepted men? Shouldn't there have been an outrage by the left groups like the ACLU for the exclusion of men on campus? Shouldn't there have been lawsuits and protests due to the inequality of the admission policies?

Personally, I don't have a problem with segregated schools based on sex, I think it can be a great thing. But, generally speaking, the left doesn't see it that way...unless it is an all female school, then it is ok.

But, again, I was being fairly light-hearted with this post. :D

jokes are only funny if they are about right wing imperialist aggressor racist sexist pigs.

that means, unless something is relevent to a (an extreme)lefties political cause it is beneath notice or concern..like:

having a miss black america pageant is okay and good, but if we had a miss white america pageant it would be racist and exclusionary and wrong.

BTW dont get testy lefties, we all know damn well it is true! :)

goodnight, now back to work, house hunting, mortgage hunting...
 
Shad0hawK said:
jokes are only funny if they are about right wing imperialist aggressor racist sexist pigs.

that means, unless something is relevent to a (an extreme)lefties political cause it is beneath notice or concern..like:

having a miss black america pageant is okay and good, but if we had a miss white america pageant it would be racist and exclusionary and wrong.

BTW dont get testy lefties, we all know damn well it is true! :)

goodnight, now back to work, house hunting, mortgage hunting...

Thank you for taking this too far and making yourself look like an aggressive idiot. :)
 
Jesus thats her complaint? If "I wont be able to run around in my nighties!" is your only complaint its time to realize that you have no argument and you need to just stop.
 
What the **** does this have to do with the left?

It looks to me like you're just trying to find a way to attack a group you don't particularly like.

We also say this about you folks, then you defend it by saying, "I dont hate America, stop saying I do. I just critize what it does because I like the country." Quick, nib! Say it! Before you blow your anti-left cover! [/sarcasm]
 
K e r b e r o s said:
We also say this about you folks, then you defend it by saying, "I dont hate America, stop saying I do. I just critize what it does because I like the country." Quick, nib! Say it! Before you blow your anti-left cover! [/sarcasm]

I've never spun an unrelated topic into an anti-right diatribe.

But come on, Kerberos. Just read the article. On what grounds can one accuse the left of anything?
 
Commenting on the article, i can understand why the women going there would be pissed, hell, I'm at VMI and though I wasn't here when women first integrated, I have seen the aftermath, and it isn't pretty, this place has lost a lot of what it used to be
Most of the women here don;t deserve to be here, they're just here to go here i guess, and while admittedly there are a lot of males here that are the same, most being NCAA athletes, females as a group have yet to impress, at all, there are maybe 1 or 2 who actually deserve to be here, the rest, well, they should leave
 
Now you see guys, this is why so many people hate fox news. Because they write their articles and produce their news stories in such a way that a person can go and read about a broke college going co-ed to keep its doors open and come away thinking it was a leftist liberal agenda put in place by Ted Kennedy himself, to try and uproot all American values....

And let me ask then, what are these American values? The freedom of religion, freedom of choice, pursuit of happiness, liberty and justice for all right. Or are they freedom to be Christian and nothing else, freedom to choose based on the Christian belief system, pursuit of God's happiness, and justice to whomever doesn't believe the same way as us? Because thats what you guys make it out to be...
 
Back
Top