Gamesmaster (UK) Half life 2 review

DigiQ8

Tank
Joined
Jul 6, 2003
Messages
5,955
Reaction score
0
From HLFallout.com
i just thought i would report a new Half life 2 review its in the latest edition of the UK gamesmaster magazine which is a multiformat magazine. they gave the game a 96% and the end comment was " well worth the long wait well, almost its one of the best games of the year. Actually, one of the best games of all time"

Another 96 % :bounce:
 
"almost its one of the best games of the year"

Almost??????
What could possibly come out this year that is a better game?
 
you heard the story that the german mag gamestar told?

they refused to test hl2 because there are only tests at valves office. the test teams get invited to valve to test the game there with rp managers and programmers in the background to try to keep them away from ugly places.

i wonder if thats the reason for all the great reviews...
 
sounds like a mis print of the comma e.g
its : well, almost its one of the best games of the year
should be : well almost, its one of the best games of the year

or I could be completly wrong.
 
Gah, i bought gamesmaster and they couldnt even be bothered to put in any new screens, theyre all the ones from PC Gamer UK...BOO!
 
flo_Orian said:
you heard the story that the german mag gamestar told?

they refused to test hl2 because there are only tests at valves office. the test teams get invited to valve to test the game there with rp managers and programmers in the background to try to keep them away from ugly places.

i wonder if thats the reason for all the great reviews...

Don't believe everything you read..

The pcgamer UK guy played it on his own PC I believe..
 
flo_Orian said:
you heard the story that the german mag gamestar told?

they refused to test hl2 because there are only tests at valves office. the test teams get invited to valve to test the game there with rp managers and programmers in the background to try to keep them away from ugly places.

i wonder if thats the reason for all the great reviews...

Bullshit, the PC Games DE mag demanded they weren't watched by Valve's people while playing, and Valve agreed.
 
Smood said:
GTA: SA 98%?


****ing retards.

How come, GTA SA definately has more replay value than HL2. That's the only possible reason why it got two more percent.
 
Yeah, and ffs guys, please stop comparing a PC game to a PS2 game. A PS2 is console for one, and it got a shitty 233mhz processor.

Within capabilities of a ps2, gta : sa rocks ass. You shouldn't be giving gta : sa 70% because "actually, the ps2 sucks in comparisation to a PC so we'll just downgrade it."

I'll place my bets on it that gta : sa next year won't get 90% for the PC.
 
Gamesmaster is a shit rag, that follows hype and expected sales projections as the first quota for reviewing a game. The quality of the reviews varies enormously and they're never as good as Edge or PCG at the best of times.

The target audience is 13 year olds who hate PC gaming and are obviously playing to that audience with a 98% for GTA:SA. I'm actually suprised HL2 got a 96%.
 
lans said:
How come, GTA SA definately has more replay value than HL2. That's the only possible reason why it got two more percent.

Sure, and I'm not saying HL2 is better (I don't know) but GTA:SA is hardly an original concept after 2 previous games, it's merely an improvement of VC, while it is without a doubt one of the, if not the best game of the year. Thus 98% is a tad high.
 
flo_Orian said:
you heard the story that the german mag gamestar told?

they refused to test hl2 because there are only tests at valves office. the test teams get invited to valve to test the game there with rp managers and programmers in the background to try to keep them away from ugly places.

i wonder if thats the reason for all the great reviews...

Or the fact they enjoyed the game ?
 
PvtRyan said:
Sure, and I'm not saying HL2 is better (I don't know) but GTA:SA is hardly an original concept after 2 previous games, it's merely an improvement of VC, while it is without a doubt one of the, if not the best game of the year. Thus 98% is a tad high.

For that matter we don't know either if hl2 is revoltionary. It could be evolving like GTA. Even the reviews say that the HL formula is taken to the next stage and the A.I. and graphics are at par with other next gen games. It's more or less an improvement on HL for all we would know, than an all out original concept.
 
they refused to test hl2 because there are only tests at valves office. the test teams get invited to valve to test the game there with rp managers and programmers in the background to try to keep them away from ugly places.

Try to keep them from ugly places, wtf?
 
How would they know, anyway, if they refused to go?

Oh, that's right, they don't, and the most respectable opinions have already reviewed it.
 
Where is the proof that this review is real? That quote about Half-Life2 not being the best game of the year sounds like bad english. :LOL:

So looks like Grand Theft Auto San Andreas is the best game of the year according to Gamestar? :|
 
lans said:
For that matter we don't know either if hl2 is revoltionary. It could be evolving like GTA. Even the reviews say that the HL formula is taken to the next stage and the A.I. and graphics are at par with other next gen games. It's more or less an improvement on HL for all we would know, than an all out original concept.

HL2's changes over HL1 are changes that alter gameplay. SA's new features over VC are changes that extend gameplay. They don't change the way the game is played or only in a minor way (like the RPG additions). The improvements like swimming or bike riding don't change gameplay much from the original, while the improvements of physics and facial animation do change the gameplay of HL2 vs HL1.
Not to say which is better, but there's a distinct difference between the improvements in both games.
 
flo_Orian said:
you heard the story that the german mag gamestar told?

they refused to test hl2 because there are only tests at valves office. the test teams get invited to valve to test the game there with rp managers and programmers in the background to try to keep them away from ugly places.

i wonder if thats the reason for all the great reviews...

No i doubt it, they can say whatever they want in the background but they don't get a say what gets printed in their magazine, also, its probably one of the reasons why Half-Life2 isn't crawling all over the internet on warez sites. It only takes one idiot and every workplace has an idiot.

UKchaos2 said:
Try to keep them from ugly places, wtf?

He means like Valve tell them to not look around that corner because Valve know a bug is there that they cant be arsed to fix. Or to not go up there because its badly mapped and the AI gets stuck in walls etc etc....

trevjim said:
hl2 will kick gta's ass

Considering one is a driving game in a sense (on PS2) and one is a FPS (on PC) i don't see how hl2 will kick gta's ass, unless of course you mean in game sales or something. If so i laugh at you. They think SA will outsell the biggest ever blockbuster and smash it off the record book by over 100million more. (if you don't know what film that is, its Titanic)
 
Slainchild said:
"almost its one of the best games of the year"

Almost??????
What could possibly come out this year that is a better game?

GTA:SA and MGS3 are contenders. We haven't played any of them yet except for GTA so no one can really make an informed decision right now.
 
PvtRyan said:
Sure, and I'm not saying HL2 is better (I don't know) but GTA:SA is hardly an original concept after 2 previous games, it's merely an improvement of VC, while it is without a doubt one of the, if not the best game of the year. Thus 98% is a tad high.
I think the point is it's fun to play. HL2 is hardly original either - I'd argue there's a hell of lot more new ideas in San Andreas than in HL2.
 
i have the review for real... i was the original poster on fallout, an example of the end statement would be "half life2.net is the best website in the world...on second thoughts it is the best website in the world" see what i mean?
 
Gamesmaster is a crap mag. I'd discard it as i do the paper used to wipe my arse.

hi :thumbs:
 
Joy_Decoy said:
Gamesmaster is a crap mag. I'd discard it as i do the paper used to wipe my arse.

hi :thumbs:
hi joy...
 
Back
Top