VirusType2
Newbie
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2005
- Messages
- 18,189
- Reaction score
- 2
Here is something ugly!
The High Cost of High Definition
Eric Dahl
From the May 2006 issue of PC World magazine
Posted Friday, March 24, 2006
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,124944,00.asp
I was already planning on building an all new PC, but I wasn't planning on buying a cutting-edge monitor, thats going to be very, very, expensive. Forget HD on my PC. I don't need it. It's all because of the stupid security measures of the HD-DVDs/ Blu-Ray discs.
This is such bullshit.
Well, to cheer you up here is some good news for those that own an HDTV (although it wouldn't be good news if it wasn't actually previously bad news)
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060327-6473.html
Some new HDTV's still don't even support HDCP, not to mention all the HDTV's sold before now. Sad really. I guess this disaster can best be described as the carriage coming before the wheel. Meaning they should have released the HD Disc players before the HDTV's!
meaning also that you won't be able to hook your PS3 up to your PC monitor like you can with the XBox360. (well that does it for me in determining which system I will buy) 360 FTW.most current monitors don't support the HDCP copy protection standard high-def content requires
The High Cost of High Definition
Eric Dahl
From the May 2006 issue of PC World magazine
Posted Friday, March 24, 2006
Source:Want HD? Buy a New PC
The Buzz: Are you thinking you can use your computer as a quick way to try out the new Blu-ray or HD DVD discs before committing to a living room player? Well, think again. Playing prerecorded HD movies on your PC won't be a simple matter of adding a new optical drive. In November we reported that most current monitors don't support the HDCP copy protection standard high-def content requires. Recently, news emerged that existing ATI graphics cards that had advertised HDCP support don't really have it. In fact, at press time no shipping graphics boards fully supported HDCP. Factoring in the cost of a new drive, a copy of Vista (XP won't support encrypted Blu-ray or HD DVD discs), A new graphics board, and a new monitor, PC-based HD is starting to look pretty costly.
Bottom Line: Anyone who's recently spent $500 on a state-of-the-art graphics board or $1000 for a wide-screen monitor deserves better.
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,124944,00.asp
I was already planning on building an all new PC, but I wasn't planning on buying a cutting-edge monitor, thats going to be very, very, expensive. Forget HD on my PC. I don't need it. It's all because of the stupid security measures of the HD-DVDs/ Blu-Ray discs.
This is such bullshit.
Well, to cheer you up here is some good news for those that own an HDTV (although it wouldn't be good news if it wasn't actually previously bad news)
Source:Following on the heels of Sony, Universal has confirmed that they will not be using such capabilities to downgrade video on their offerings, at least for now. This marks what looks to be a major studio to turn away from the so-called image constraint token—the name given to the AACS software functionality that allows for downsampling video to 960x540 (approximately NTSC). Paramount, Disney and Twentieth Century Fox have all backed off of using the ICT, leaving Warner Brothers as the only major studio saying that they will use the it. According to BusinessWeek, sources say that Warner will use the ICT on "at least some" of their initial titles.
The question is, why are they forgoing ICT? For now, it looks like good business sense is driving the discussion. Even today, not all new TV sets support HDCP, and the vitally important "early adopter" crowd contains no small number of people with HD sets that were sold before the HDCP requirements were known. In short, most of the studios understand that launching new, expensive players alongside rather expensive movies could flop if the ICT is used extensively. After all, a Blu-ray player may cost $1,000, but if you can't get anything much better than existing DVD playback, why bother?
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060327-6473.html
Some new HDTV's still don't even support HDCP, not to mention all the HDTV's sold before now. Sad really. I guess this disaster can best be described as the carriage coming before the wheel. Meaning they should have released the HD Disc players before the HDTV's!