Hezbollah, Hamas and Israel: Everything You Need To Know

Better read up on Wiki instead of this mindless propaganda.

Its about the most "colored" propaganda i've read in a long time. Its funny the articles refers to the "forgetting" of the prehistory, while it works very hard to "forget" any suicide bombing, indoctrination and terrorist act commited by organisations like Hamas and Hezbollah, that fuel Israeli responses, but hey, who needs to know that.
Teh evil pwn Israel just doesnt want peace aye
 
Prison Planet?

Are you ****ing kidding me? Next time something racially-related comes up, shall we start posting links to Stormfront?
 
Too opinionated for my liking. Try wiki, as someone already said.
 
When I'm king Alex Jones will be first against the wall.
 
hehe, the reason its pure bs, is because it manages to do exactly what it accuses "the media" of doing: erasing parts of history.
 
And don’t forget to check out http://www.worldnetdaily.com/ while you’re at it. There you will learn about the evil evolutionist conspiracy to make you believe that oil comes from fossils!

Now if you excuse me I need to go finish up my tinfoil hat so I can block out the cell phone tower mind control transmissions from the illuminati at bohemian grove before they brainwash me into accepting the microchip of the beast. Good day.
 
DaMaN said:
Agreed. This outlines the struggles of leftist wackjobs in these regions very well.

-DaMaN
Fixed.

Firstly, I find this quite offensive. What I have posted are my own words, please post your own words. Do not presume to know what I mean to say. I'd like to point out that this is also not very good conduct:
Half life 2 Registration Rules said:
By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.
Also, Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states:
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

---

Now, that being said, I would like to proceed by pointing out the flaws in your "correction":

First, the context of my post was in regard to the struggles of the people in link given in the original post on this topic: http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/21170/Hezbollah_Hamas_and_Israel_Everything_You_Need_To_Know

From this, it is obvious that I was referring to Palestinians and Lebanese. These two peoples are not neccecarially Leftists. That said, I'm sure there are plenty of Leftists in both countries, as Leftist includes people who are dedicated to Social Justice and Liberty. Given that both countries are under attack in a socially unjust war, with many of their liberties trounced and blown up, I'm sure many are feeling "Leftist" in these countries.


Second, it is fairly obvious that while a great many people in these countries may be considered "leftist", I'm disinclined to accept your replacement of "peoples" with "wackjobs.

According to Urban Dictionary, there are six definitions to "Wackjob", which I'll analyze in order:

"1. a complete nut absolutly ****ing crazy some syn. mother-in-law, nut, loon etc."
This is obviously incorrect, as not everyone in these countries are raving nuts. Granted, there are probably some natural nuts there, and some that have been turned nuts by the bombing and destruction of their homes, but all in all people are generally very sane anywhere you go.

"2. An ecentric individual prone to odd behavior, ie. sitting and rocking, twiddling thumbs, mumbling incessantly about helicopters, and outbursts of lewd indecent exposure"
This is also incorrect, for the same reasons as above. As for the lewdness, you can make your own decision on that one.

"3. A quack, crackpot, or insane mofo. Usually prone to delusions of paranoia, schizophrenia, and any other fun mental image seen on tv."
Again, this seems to fall in with the first two, though it would be easy to see why some Lebonese might be paranoid, what with over 350 of their civilians (mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, sons and daughters), being bombed to death over two soldiers.

"4. Someone who is so stupid, annoying, or just plain retarded she might as well be whacked by a hitman to put her out of her misery."
There is no possible way you can lump the whole of Lebanon and Palestine into this category. Though some may be stupid or annoying, Palestine has several universities and many educated people, as does Lebanon. Though it's doubtful how many are standing due to recent bombing attacks.

"5. One who is prone to talking to hemselves more than others. in some instances may be wwearing a tutu and referring to themselves as 'spongebob'."
Again, see above.

"6. another word for handjob"
Since people are generally NOT defined as handjobs, I'm fairly sure this definition is wong as well.


Hence, your "correction" was incorrect.

---

Finally, I would like to point out that I did not say that the article was a good judgement of the entire situation, I said that it was a good judgement of the oppressed peoples in this situation, namely those of Palestine and Lebanon.

-DaMaN
 
The way he edited your quote in his post is perfectly fine and acceptable.

I urge you to quickly grow up.






<packs his bags because the moderators will quickly throw him out due to a complaint about an obscene comment regarding unnatural body development>
 
The way he edited your quote in his post is perfectly fine and acceptable.

I urge you to quickly grow up.

Pardon me, but what does portraying facts and opinions have to do with "growing up"?

And I think I made it quite clear in my previous post that the way he edited my quote in his post was not perfectly fine and acceptable.

-DaMaN
 
Pardon me, but what does portraying facts and opinions have to do with "growing up"?

And I think I made it quite clear in my previous post that the way he edited my quote in his post was not perfectly fine and acceptable.

-DaMaN

Facts and opinions? I'm talking about your comment of his editing your quote.

Sorry to say it buddy, but it's perfectly acceptable. He didn't cross any boundries and you're being way too sensitive.

Now... if he wrote something utterly offensive and objectional, I could understand... but that is NOT objectional, even if you may think it is to you. These forums see far worse than that on a regular basis.
 
All threads containing links in the original post to any alex jones articles should be tagged so reasonable people can avoid them.

An example

!PRISON PLANET! Hezbollah, Hamas and Israel: Everything You Need To Know if You Want to Be Completely Misinformed
 
Firstly, I find this quite offensive...blah blah blah...my civil rights are being violated, etc etc etc.
Look man, I merely mean not that you are a wackjob (though you are doing a fine job of proving yourself to be with nonsense like that last long post), but rather that the article itself demonstrates to all of us the struggles of the arguably LEFTIST WACKJOB behind that site. Alex Jones is one of the craziest, most offensive, and least intelligent people on the planet. All YOU need to know, DaMan, is that this guy couldn't be any more of an idiot and as such, the schlock he posts on his site is subject to the same criticism.

Oh, and lighten up, willya? :bounce:
 
They've been fighting for a while, no one is justified, and Israel is our butt buddy. What else is new?
 
I think I'd rather chew on broken glass than watch that!

Me chewing on glass: :LOL: :x
 
Back
Top