How come quake 4 looks so bad ?!!

because it sucks ?

really, after UE3 and the Killzone footage there's very little that can excite me :(
except photorealism :D
 
Sprafa said:
because it sucks ?

really, after UE3 and the Killzone footage there's very little that can excite me :(
except photorealism :D

Those games won't be out until late 2006, Quake IV will be out this year.

There's nothing wrong with it IMO.
 
I think it looks disgusting, But Im still buying it for the multi player...
 
If you think it's disgusting then you shouldn't even bother buying it as I see it. You'd be wasting your money.

I like the way Quake4 is coming along though. Kicks everything elses ass so far IMO.
 
But I have to get it BECAUSE its disgusting... bring back the gibbingness!
 
mortiz said:
Those games won't be out until late 2006, Quake IV will be out this year.

There's nothing wrong with it IMO.

I'm just begging for the Lost Coast to shut you up :)
 
Sprafa said:
I'm just begging for the Lost Coast to shut you up :)

The Lost Coast is just one level though and requires a top of the range PC to run it. Unless Raven or id was suicidal I doubt they'd make their game that intensive.
 
imo looks cool even if the doom3 is not so shocking now
 
Quake4 suks?

Dood quake4 is not a next gen game...........GET IT?

Quake4 roks because it has the best graphics for this year games..
 
Quake 4 just doesnt look all that hot too me and no im not comparing it to next gen im comparing it to HL2 and D3.
 
mortiz said:
The Lost Coast is just one level though and requires a top of the range PC to run it. Unless Raven or id was suicidal I doubt they'd make their game that intensive.

Still, my point remains, it's from this generation of games. It'll show what Source is truly capable of.
 
I think the trailer looks quite action packed. It makes me laugh how they toned the video with blue though to get rid of all the blood which would proberly make the trailer an 18 alone :p
 
It's not really a next gen game, it's designed to run on the same PCs that could run Doom 3.
 
It was actually a choice whether to put out D3 in 2004 or Q4 in 2004 Because they were both being worked on at the same time.
 
Half-Life 2
Doom 3
Quake 4
F.E.A.R
Stalker

are all 2004-2005 gen. games.

UT2007
Gears of War
etc. etc.

Are 2006-2007 Gen games. Plz dont compare.
 
Raziel-Jcd said:
Half-Life 2
Doom 3
Quake 4
F.E.A.R
Stalker

are all 2004-2005 gen. games.

UT2007
Gears of War
etc. etc.

Are 2006-2007 Gen games. Plz dont compare.

Well said, you also need to take into acount the words "next generation" imo not say that a new game which comes out every year is 'next Generation' But its down to the hardware it runs on. With such a huge leap with Cell type proccessors in most new systems (even PC) this is classed as next gen. You won't be playing Killzone for a very long time but quake4 could be out in a matter of months. That was quite badly explained but I think some people should understand.
 
Doppelgofer said:
quake4 looks great...the trailer was brilliant and i highly await

Couldn't agree more. I'm looking forward to it.
 
It is looking bad because Raven id developing it. To me at least.
I don't like the heads-up display, the weapons, the upgrade weapons idea, the Strogg player idea and that's about it.
 
If you have a problem with the blue blood and stuff in the trailer, use some video editing software to swap red and blue (I used VideoMach 3) - now the trailer looks at least twice cooler than before ;)

I don't know if it has been done on purpose (blue instead of red) or is it some sort of an encoding error.

I love the trailer and can't wait to finally play Quake 4! It's going to be something that Doom 3 wasn't - Quake is going to be brighter, with more open areas and a lot more action. And, you can use a flashlight while holding a weapon :D So I think that people who hated Doom, should like the new Quake :]
 
Was the footage from KillZone even in-game??? Was that confirmed??

At least iD and Raven had the balls to show in-game footage. One of few to do so. And Quake 4 still looks great.
 
I've heard Killzone footage wasn't in-game, it was a pre-rendered intro. We need an official statement from Sony :p
 
Even though I think it's pretty obvious that the Killzone trailer was not in-game (the slight motion blur, weird 1st person movement, and rock-solid framerate give it away) what Sony is saying is that these "next gen" games will blur the line between pre-rendered and in-game. I mean, it's great that we can even debate it now.

What did that have to do with Quake 4? Well, after watching all this E3 footage of the new consoles, I can really see that the Doom 3 engine is showing it's age. The polygons on the players are fairly obvious, the lighting looks bland, the textures aren't as high-rez as I would expect now, and the worst thing of all: those damn plastic looking faces!

I was so excited looking at some of the Gears of War shots, the Fight Night Round 3 demo, and especially the PS3 demo with the realtime Doc Oc face to see realistic human skin!

I'm still excited for Quake 4, but I hope we move on to these new engines quick so we can forget the horrible plasticy people from games like Doom 3 and Far Cry.
 
Raziel-Jcd said:
Half-Life 2
Doom 3
Quake 4
F.E.A.R
Stalker

are all 2004-2005 gen. games.

UT2007
Gears of War
etc. etc.

Are 2006-2007 Gen games. Plz dont compare.

where would BF2 come?
 
Gorgon said:
Quake4 suks?

Dood quake4 is not a next gen game...........GET IT?

Quake4 roks because it has the best graphics for this year games..

Half life 2 has better graphics. I'm hating this sh*tty Doom 3 engine that makes everything look like plastic.

<3
 
Back
Top