Humans can see into the future

Atomic_Piggy

Newbie
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
6,485
Reaction score
2
Not in an awesome nostrodamas kind of way, only one tenth of a second:

Humans can see into the future, says a cognitive scientist. It's nothing like the alleged predictive powers of Nostradamus, but we do get a glimpse of events one-tenth of a second before they occur.

ADVERTISEMENT

And the mechanism behind that can also explain why we are tricked by optical illusions.


Researcher Mark Changizi of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York says it starts with a neural lag that most everyone experiences while awake. When light hits your retina, about one-tenth of a second goes by before the brain translates the signal into a visual perception of the world.


Scientists already knew about the lag, yet they have debated over exactly how we compensate, with one school of thought proposing our motor system somehow modifies our movements to offset the delay.


Changizi now says it's our visual system that has evolved to compensate for neural delays, generating images of what will occur one-tenth of a second into the future. That foresight keeps our view of the world in the present. It gives you enough heads up to catch a fly ball (instead of getting socked in the face) and maneuver smoothly through a crowd. His research on this topic is detailed in the May/June issue of the journal Cognitive Science,


Explaining illusions


That same seer ability can explain a range of optical illusions, Changizi found.


"Illusions occur when our brains attempt to perceive the future, and those perceptions don't match reality," Changizi said.


Here's how the foresight theory could explain the most common visual illusions - geometric illusions that involve shapes: Something called the Hering illusion, for instance, looks like bike spokes around a central point, with vertical lines on either side of this central, so-called vanishing point. The illusion tricks us into thinking we are moving forward, and thus, switches on our future-seeing abilities. Since we aren't actually moving and the figure is static, we misperceive the straight lines as curved ones.


"Evolution has seen to it that geometric drawings like this elicit in us premonitions of the near future," Changizi said. "The converging lines toward a vanishing point (the spokes) are cues that trick our brains into thinking we are moving forward - as we would in the real world, where the door frame (a pair of vertical lines) seems to bow out as we move through it - and we try to perceive what that world will look like in the next instant."


Grand unified theory


In real life, when you are moving forward, it's not just the shape of objects that changes, he explained. Other variables, such as the angular size (how much of your visual field the object takes up), speed and contrast between the object and background, will also change.


For instance, if two objects are about the same distance in front of you, and you move toward one of the objects, that object will speed up more in the next moment, appear larger, have lower contrast (because something that is moving faster gets more blurred), and literally get nearer to you compared with the other object.


Changizi realized the same future-seeing process could explain several other types of illusions. In what he refers to as a "grand unified theory," Changizi organized 50 kinds of illusions into a matrix of 28 categories. The results can successfully predict how certain variables, such as proximity to the central point or size, will be perceived.


Changizi says that finding a theory that works for so many different classes of illusions is "a theorist's dream."


Most other ideas put forth to explain illusions have explained one or just a few types, he said.
The theory is "a big new player in the debate about the origins of illusions," Changizi told LiveScience. "All I'm hoping for is that it becomes a giant gorilla on the block that can take some punches."

Humans can see into the future, says a cognitive scientist. It's nothing like the alleged predictive powers of Nostradamus, but we do get a glimpse of events one-tenth of a second before they occur.

ADVERTISEMENT

And the mechanism behind that can also explain why we are tricked by optical illusions.


Researcher Mark Changizi of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York says it starts with a neural lag that most everyone experiences while awake. When light hits your retina, about one-tenth of a second goes by before the brain translates the signal into a visual perception of the world.


Scientists already knew about the lag, yet they have debated over exactly how we compensate, with one school of thought proposing our motor system somehow modifies our movements to offset the delay.


Changizi now says it's our visual system that has evolved to compensate for neural delays, generating images of what will occur one-tenth of a second into the future. That foresight keeps our view of the world in the present. It gives you enough heads up to catch a fly ball (instead of getting socked in the face) and maneuver smoothly through a crowd. His research on this topic is detailed in the May/June issue of the journal Cognitive Science,


Explaining illusions


That same seer ability can explain a range of optical illusions, Changizi found.


"Illusions occur when our brains attempt to perceive the future, and those perceptions don't match reality," Changizi said.


Here's how the foresight theory could explain the most common visual illusions - geometric illusions that involve shapes: Something called the Hering illusion, for instance, looks like bike spokes around a central point, with vertical lines on either side of this central, so-called vanishing point. The illusion tricks us into thinking we are moving forward, and thus, switches on our future-seeing abilities. Since we aren't actually moving and the figure is static, we misperceive the straight lines as curved ones.


"Evolution has seen to it that geometric drawings like this elicit in us premonitions of the near future," Changizi said. "The converging lines toward a vanishing point (the spokes) are cues that trick our brains into thinking we are moving forward - as we would in the real world, where the door frame (a pair of vertical lines) seems to bow out as we move through it - and we try to perceive what that world will look like in the next instant."


Grand unified theory


In real life, when you are moving forward, it's not just the shape of objects that changes, he explained. Other variables, such as the angular size (how much of your visual field the object takes up), speed and contrast between the object and background, will also change.


For instance, if two objects are about the same distance in front of you, and you move toward one of the objects, that object will speed up more in the next moment, appear larger, have lower contrast (because something that is moving faster gets more blurred), and literally get nearer to you compared with the other object.


Changizi realized the same future-seeing process could explain several other types of illusions. In what he refers to as a "grand unified theory," Changizi organized 50 kinds of illusions into a matrix of 28 categories. The results can successfully predict how certain variables, such as proximity to the central point or size, will be perceived.


Changizi says that finding a theory that works for so many different classes of illusions is "a theorist's dream."


Most other ideas put forth to explain illusions have explained one or just a few types, he said.
The theory is "a big new player in the debate about the origins of illusions," Changizi told LiveScience. "All I'm hoping for is that it becomes a giant gorilla on the block that can take some punches."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20080602/sc_livescience/keytoallopticalillusionsdiscovered
 
so is a lag?

dam I am gonna sue god to give me a better brain conection to stop this lag *shake fist at sky*
 
I always knew I was ahead of my time.
 
Damn it, god has ping advantage, not fair!
 
Hmm, so it doesn't actually see the future, but predicts it. Interesting.
 
Cool. What about Deja-vu. I get that alot, mostly during dreams, but you never realise it was potentially Deja-vu until it happens...:(

Still, cool :D
 
Atomic, I think I saw into the past, and that you pasted the quote twice inside quote tags. I am the only one that noticed?
 
Is that why lip-synching or dubbing is usually awful?
 
Well, it's hardly seeing into the future as it has already happened but cool none the less. I wonder if some brains have lower latency than others? :p I may has to upgrade my neural network.
 
I went to Walmart one day and happened across a copy of Blue Oyster Cult's greatest hit CD for cheap price which had the song "don't fear the reaper" on it. I bought it then I realized the night before I had a dream were I was a reaper o_O?! I've also had a few deja-vu's whilst awake and often an episode or scene from a movie I really like will pop into my head and the next day that episode or movie is on.

I believe all of us have latent "mind abilities" some are just more developed then others. Not mine. It's always random. Suck's to cause my family's in a tight spot and I could use the winning lotto numbers lol.
 
I used to get deja-vu loads when I was younger (12-15 kind of time), now I don't get it at all.
 
Cool. What about Deja-vu. I get that alot, mostly during dreams, but you never realise it was potentially Deja-vu until it happens...:(

Still, cool :D

You want to know something ****ed up to hell? I was sitting in the back seat of a car one day, and had Deja-vu. I was sitting there, thinking to myself at the time...was like "OK, now she's going to turn the radio up..." And she did that...then "He's going to adjust his seat belt...." then he did. I was freaked out to hell.
 
Sometimes we i get de ja vu what i see has a bad outcome. So while i am seeing it i am freaked out because i don't know if it happens or not. It never does. :bonce:
 
I believe rabbits can't do that.

And why the huge extract? It stops being an extract and becomes an essay :|
 
Are their actions compensated for in the same way though?

They whouldn't need any compensation, becouse they can't see.
Events happen, but your brain predicts it as he said. It takes a small amount of time for the signal from the eye to register the movment in your brain, but it predicts it.

Right?
 
itt people not understanding the article...
Well, it's hardly seeing into the future as it has already happened but cool none the less.
What? No. It didn't already happen, it's what your brain thinks IS GOING to happen. It projects that visually. And this just goes as far as things moving/shifting in your vision like the article described, not like seeing a car crash about to happen and being able to save a small child from being struck by a flying wheel.

Are their actions compensated for in the same way though?
Who said anything about actions being compensated? The VISION is compensated with actions that your brain predicts. All this is completely irrelevant to a blind person because they have no vision. It's like reading an article about a new laser surgery for better vision, and then asking 'what about blind people?' ...
 
Fantastic discovery. Interesting how two scientific fields can mingle together :)


There's hope for the human race yet!
 
Yeah this is going to stop global warming!
 
pffft, god gave me a shitty internet connection..

lol already said joke.

HIGHLANDER DOES NOT CARE.
 
Last night I had a dream that the shop round the corner had re-stocked a certain type of drink that I hadn't seen there for a while, and today they had.

That's right bitches. BOW TO ME, for I am the god of soft drink stock prediction.
 
I wonder if this ties in a bit with how we are able to adapt to like, a laggy game. I mean like, when actions you do on the keyboard and mouse are delayed in the game. You eventually get used to it. Probably not as much a vision thing, though.
 
Half a second? That doesn't help me at all. *dodges thrown tomato*

Well, I guess it's somewhat useful.
 
I dunno, seems like crap to me, but what do I know?

I always just accepted the fact that what we see is never "live," there's always a small delay.
 
Back
Top