Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
they died in world war 2Pesmerga said:Where did all the real men go?
gh0st said:they died in world war 2
Icarusintel said:hmmm... i taped it cause i was too busy watching Lost, should I even watch the tape?
hmmm... now i'm starting to feel bad about taping over 24xlucidx said:Sure if watching poorly acted soldiers crying, and whining about being over there is your thing.
Pesmerga said:Stop stealing my "Discuss" motto, bitch.
I only saw the last 15 minutes where the emo soldiers were crying about horrific atrocities of nature, or something. "I can't describe in words *cuts wrists* what has happened to me *cries*"
Where did all the real men go?
Pesmerga said:WWII soldiers were EXTREME.
That was a time when war was...civilized, in a sense. Now one side has taken the gloves off, we'll take ours off when we're ready.
The fighting in WWII was actually against a powerful enemy. Fighting back a military force that was capable of practically steamrolling through countries (moreso at the beginning) is a bit different than fighting an already weak country that was even further weakened by sanctions. Wading through the water and up the beach on foot while machinegun emplacements are shooting all around you is a little worse than rolling in with tanks and shit after bombing the crap out of the area. WWII soldiers didn't have a lot of technology to fall back on... and the technological advantage over was probably nonexistant, at best. WWII had the draft. You were flipping burgers? Tough. Now you're fighting to help save the world from Germany and Japan (if you're on the side of the Allies). Yeah... it is a bit more "extreme" than the "war" in Iraq.satch919 said:How can WWII soldiers be any more "EXTREME" than the guys fighting in Iraq? They're soldiers and they kill. Our guys today can kick some serious ass. I'd like you to go up to a Navy SEAL, Delta Force Operative, or Iraq combat veteran and tell them that WWII soldiers were more extreme.
And another thing. When has war ever been civilized? What's civilized about humans killing other humans?
Pesmerga said:Wow satch, I didn't really expect anyone to get their panties in a bunch. But you proved me wrong.
I like how you take the morale high ground, the popular defense, even if you have nothing to gain. Good job on making the intarweb look like serious shit.
SFLUFAN said:BACK to the topic at hand - if you didn't like "Over There", you're in good company. The US Army didn't like it either:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/tv/233932_over26.html
Their evaluation of the show: "bogus".
SFLUFAN said:I think the main beef the soldiers have with "Over There" is the way they're being portrayed by the actors and the nature of tactics the show depicts. I don't think the soldiers would have any argument if they were depicted in roughly the same way as the actors in "Band of Brothers" depicted the men of the 101st Airborne.
SFLUFAN said:C'mon Satch - you know you want to visit us over at IGN again
Yeah, but it got a little -too- rediculous. Beyond the point of your regular folks knowing that's not the tactic. Pulling over after a roadside bomb was the pinnacle of that, as an example. You'd have to be retarded to do so.satch919 said:Well, Band of Brothers had the budget and help of Tom Hanks, Steven Spielberg, and HBO. 'Over There' probably has a considerably lower budget.
I think its pretty decent for a cable show miniseries. Most of the audience isn't going to be military personnel, it'll be the regular citizen who have little to no knowledge of military tactics and training.
He wanted the first shot... duh.bam23 said:There's just so much nonsense shooting. The Sarge says "NO WARNING SHOTS I REPEAT NO WARNING SHOTS." What happens? The Sergeant is the first person to fire warning shots. Why bother saying that in the first place?