Raziaar
I Hate Custom Titles
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2003
- Messages
- 29,769
- Reaction score
- 140
So and so looks Presidential!
So and so doesn't look very Presidential.
GIVE ME A ****ING BREAK. What is it with our god damn shallow country in the modern era. How prevalent is this in other countries? Back in the day, there didn't seem to be much stock in a president "looking presidential", at least from looking at them. They seemed like dudes from every physical appearance category.
It's like choosing Chamberlain over Churchill. I bet our society today would choose Chamberlain over Churchill based on "looking presidential" and we'd be ****ed.
Are you so shallow that you evaluate a candidate's potential performance as president based on looks? Cause even if it's the tiniest bit, you're a douche. There, I said it.
What the **** America?
EDIT: And so help me god if you talk about a full head of hair I will choke you to death. You're supposed to vote for him to lead the country not to **** you and give you pretty babies.
So and so doesn't look very Presidential.
GIVE ME A ****ING BREAK. What is it with our god damn shallow country in the modern era. How prevalent is this in other countries? Back in the day, there didn't seem to be much stock in a president "looking presidential", at least from looking at them. They seemed like dudes from every physical appearance category.
It's like choosing Chamberlain over Churchill. I bet our society today would choose Chamberlain over Churchill based on "looking presidential" and we'd be ****ed.
Are you so shallow that you evaluate a candidate's potential performance as president based on looks? Cause even if it's the tiniest bit, you're a douche. There, I said it.
What the **** America?
EDIT: And so help me god if you talk about a full head of hair I will choke you to death. You're supposed to vote for him to lead the country not to **** you and give you pretty babies.