Intel Smacks Four On The Floor (AMD Has A Problem)

[Barney Fife]

And it's sooner than you think.....Maybe. http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/2100-10879_11-6118762.html?tag=nl.e019

 

[-Psy-]

Woo ****ing yay.

Anndddd?

 

[Barney Fife]

Woo ****ing yay. Anndddd?

Anndddd Your Weenie is showing?

 

[-Psy-]

Lol. I don't see how this is bad for AMD

They'll have a Quad-Core CPU in the works.

 

[The Brick]

Not that impressive yet. Especially for games.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/10/four_cores_on_the_rampage/

 

[DEATHMASTER]

at your avatar, reminds me of Strong Mad.

 

[-Psy-]

Seems pretty meh tbh.

 

[Asus]

Quad core is great for workstations/servers. They are going to use different memory for the new Xeon chips, right? I think FBDIMMs.
Here is a look at AMD's upcoming Quad core with some slides.
Power consumption looks good. They will be able to control each core's power state which I don't think Intel's will be able to do.

I don't think AMD is in any danger in the multi-CPU market. Just with single CPUs (multi-core). And I don't think it will 'hurt' AMD but it will slow their market share gains because less people will buy AMD. The reason it will just slow AMD down is because their advances in who offers their systems has greatly increased (one example is Dell). I believe they have been doubling market share in servers every year.

 

[hungryduck]

its okay, this kind of competition is good; more good products for us.

 

[Barney Fife]

indeed

 

[nutcrackr]

I'm going to love encoding on one core, gaming on another core, watching hi def tv on another core and....word processing on the fourth core :X

 

[-Psy-]

Lol.

You prove a point