Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
RakuraiTenjin said:Baxter this is in no way anti-Muslim.
Anti Iranian government and anti Palestinian terrorists is in no way a bad thing.
The schoolchildren video would be a great post in the post about Hamas's children publication demanding the return of Seville. You should put it there also.
Spicy Tuna said:lol Baxter, I can say the same thing about stern and his"anti america" threads
baxter said:Come on don’t be so naïve, we all know where this is leading.
You know and I know the forces are gathering and this is simply a prelude to the invasion.
Call it propaganda, call it demonetisation, call it what ever you will but for goodness sake stop acting the innocent.
The soldiers are marching up the hill (read your presidents state of the Union address); do you really think that it won’t happen?
What better way to justify the invasion is there? Other than to feed the fear?
In six months time maybe I will be proved wrong………..I doubt it.
Spicy Tuna said:you 2 just dont get the point,stern likes to make threads about the US Goverment....most of the time.most of the time they are legitmate becuase he criteszises, what ever they do "wrong" (Iraq war for exsample).So basicly lister makes threads about Muslim terrorists what they do "wrong"....now Im sure you see where Im getting at.Stern is as much of anti american as lister is anti muslim.But the lives of you two seem so fixiated on politics that you cant grasp simple stuf anymore..its sad.
oh when you start whining about me being racsist and what not,you just prove my point.
good night.
Gunner said:Learn2spell, this incoherent gibberish hurts my brain. I won't even comment on the content, because nobody cares what you think.
Spicy Tuna said:I wish you were on that bus.
Its true, opinion/emotion gets in the way too much. These are issues that, for whatever reason, people feel extremely strongly about. Some of them affect us and we comment and others don't affect us and we still comment. Then those whom it did affect get angry at those whom it didn't affect because how can they say anything since it didn't affect them and they have no first-hand knowledge of the situation. Its all just piecemeal from what we find in our scouring of obscure political and oftentimes quite biased websites which are not devoid of their own opinion along with the "facts" presented as they see fit in order to further their argument or cause.CptStern said:it doesnt have to be that way, we could have had a civil discussion but you let emotion get in the way
the problem quite often is that we dont debate facts but rather debate opinion
CptStern said:I think it has very much to do with the right going on defensive mode since the iraq war ..In my lifetime I have never seen americans so polarized ..never have I heard an american say "you're either with us or against us" "if you dont support your country you're a traitor" before the war ..that just didnt happen, not in my lifetime. Now it seems to be rallying cry for those who would support "their" side at all cost no matter what the outcome no matter how strong the evidence
Since it was such a sketchy move (going to war in Iraq), its only natural that they go one the defensive, knowing full well that the truth would make a lot of people upset. I saw a former presidential advisor on CNN this morning and he praised the Freedom of Information Act, but also commented that if this administration wants to try to heal the horribly negative appearance that they have cultivated lo these past few years, they are going to have be a lot more forthcoming and truthful and open about what they have been doing. Everyone in the world wants to know just what is going on with this terribly secret and apparently rather dishonest and greedy boys' club. He also asked what are the chances of a new policy of openness being adopted by the current administartion and everyone just laughed, though a little sadly, knowing full-well the answer.CptStern said:I think it has very much to do with the right going on defensive mode since the iraq war ..In my lifetime I have never seen americans so polarized ..never have I heard an american say "you're either with us or against us" "if you dont support your country you're a traitor" before the war ..that just didnt happen, not in my lifetime. Now it seems to be rallying cry for those who would support "their" side at all cost no matter what the outcome no matter how strong the evidence
VictimOfScience said:Since it was such a sketchy move (going to war in Iraq), its only natural that they go one the defensive, knowing full well that the truth would make a lot of people upset. I saw a former presidential advisor on CNN this morning and he praised the Freedom of Information Act, but also commented that if this administration wants to try to heal the horribly negative appearance that they have cultivated lo these past few years, they are going to have be a lot more forthcoming and truthful and open about what they have been doing. Everyone in the world wants to know just what is going on with this terribly secret and apparently rather dishonest and greedy boys' club. He also asked what are the chances of a new policy of openness being adopted by the current administartion and everyone just laughed, though a little sadly, knowing full-well the answer.
It would be fun to see muslim demonstrations, cartoons or mocks dissing the extremists, rising up to protest against this kind of behavior...
It would be fun just for once to see a mass uprise like the one regarding the cartoons, but then anti-extremist and terrorist.
It would be fun to just for once see the islamic world step up and fight barbarism within its own nations and their thoughts.
Sure not even 1/3 of the islamic nations are radical. But looking at the damage the radical muslims inflict on the world's view vs the islam ( the polarisation ) it would be extremely healthy for the moderate islam to say it out loud and protest: "**** you hypocrits, stop using Allah for violance, and your freekin jihad! Maniacs are not tollerated in Islam!"
It would be fun to see a muslim country invade another muslim country because its commiting crimes against humanity, and/or against other religions...
What a wonderfull time that would be...
No, no. Don't get me wrong, I completely believe as the rest of the world should, that there was a huge amount of wrongdoing that should indeed be grounds for impeachment! I don't deny that at all!CptStern said:yes but this is an apologists stance. I see this even from democrats ..they're watering down the calculated lies in an attempt to downplay any wrong doing ..it is quite clear from the downingstreetmemos and official declassified US documents that the bush admin fixed evidence and lied to the american people from the very start which culminated in an invasion and occupation that has done nothing but done the exact opposite of what they said it would do ..that in itself should be enough grounds for impeachment but were that to happen heads would roll on both sides as congress was fully aware as early as 1992 that saddam didnt have wmd and didnt have the capability to produce them
Kindly stay out of it Clarky. We're trying to have a serious conversation and you have to come along and be a kiddie. Just stop.clarky003 said:Sternzored I believe.
Ha! Probably best not to let that be known lest it ruin their "sure-thing" in '08. I can't think of another reason either. Strange....CptStern said:I really dont have an answer for you ..I dont know why the dems dont stand up and demand impeachment ..the republicans went after clinton tooth and nail for years before lewinsky was finally discovered ..I even saw an interview with a few right wing journalists that said they hounded him, invented stories, even going so far as to accuse him of criminal activities, anything to show clinton in a negative light ...the only thing I can think of is that the dems knew saddam wasnt armed so as to not lose face they cant let that be known
Heh, I wasn't entirely sure--I appreciate the clarification though. :cheers:CptStern said:btw when I said "apologist stance" ..I meant the presidential advisor not you
I think it has very much to do with the right going on defensive mode since the iraq war ..In my lifetime I have never seen americans so polarized ..never have I heard an american say "you're either with us or against us" "if you dont support your country you're a traitor" before the war ..that just didnt happen, not in my lifetime. Now it seems to be rallying cry for those who would support "their" side at all cost no matter what the outcome no matter how strong the evidence