Que-Ever
Newbie
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 9,042
- Reaction score
- 2
That's, uh, harry potter, by the way. This is my review, and I encourage others to post reviews too.
I did not like this movie as much as the other ones. The first thirty or so minutes was like a slideshow- first it started with the dream, then, bam! burrow, then bam! campground, then bam! attack on the campground. (they skipped the actual quidditch cup entirely) I think you needed to have read the book to get what was going on.
After that, it got better though. The acting was alright, in most cases (Alan rickman FTW) and I normally don't like deviations from books, but this I think did an ok job of narrowing everything down.
The ending was the best part, as I feel it should be in movies. I hated the actor for voldemort, his voice was WAY off, and he was jsut a bad actor in general. They got his look down prefect though. From when they introduced him onward, the movie was great.
The actor for moody was not exactly what I expected, but he got the job done. I absolutely HATED dumbledore though. He's supposed to be this level headed guy, calm and cool all the time, but in the movie he YELLED, and grabbed people and shook them and such. Hated him, I did. Daniel Radcliffe needs to work out hsi facial expressions- he looks like he's smiling when he's supposed to be scared, and like he's in pain when he supposed to be smiling.
Anyway, if I needed to rate it, I'd give it a three out of five, or something. 6 out of ten. See it if you really want to, I don't care.
Please post your own reviews!
EDIT: oh crap, I just found the other thread, I swear I looked and didn't see it. If anyone wants to post this there or whatever, I'd appreciate it. Merge the threads, or w/e.
I did not like this movie as much as the other ones. The first thirty or so minutes was like a slideshow- first it started with the dream, then, bam! burrow, then bam! campground, then bam! attack on the campground. (they skipped the actual quidditch cup entirely) I think you needed to have read the book to get what was going on.
After that, it got better though. The acting was alright, in most cases (Alan rickman FTW) and I normally don't like deviations from books, but this I think did an ok job of narrowing everything down.
The ending was the best part, as I feel it should be in movies. I hated the actor for voldemort, his voice was WAY off, and he was jsut a bad actor in general. They got his look down prefect though. From when they introduced him onward, the movie was great.
The actor for moody was not exactly what I expected, but he got the job done. I absolutely HATED dumbledore though. He's supposed to be this level headed guy, calm and cool all the time, but in the movie he YELLED, and grabbed people and shook them and such. Hated him, I did. Daniel Radcliffe needs to work out hsi facial expressions- he looks like he's smiling when he's supposed to be scared, and like he's in pain when he supposed to be smiling.
Anyway, if I needed to rate it, I'd give it a three out of five, or something. 6 out of ten. See it if you really want to, I don't care.
Please post your own reviews!
EDIT: oh crap, I just found the other thread, I swear I looked and didn't see it. If anyone wants to post this there or whatever, I'd appreciate it. Merge the threads, or w/e.
