brokenjago
Newbie
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2003
- Messages
- 328
- Reaction score
- 0
Lack of comprehension?
Recently, I have noticed a lack of comprehension among the masses when it comes to the difference between having Direct X 9 (DX9) installed and having a card that supports it. Why, just the other day I was talking to an acquaintance who insisted that Halo was a DX9 app because it required DX9 to be installed, and because it ran beautifuly on his computer, he assumed his GeForce 4 MX 440 was a DX9 card. This was not the only time, it has popped up with several people.
I tried to explain to him that just because the game requires DX9 doesn't mean it uses DX9's most important features (i.e Pixel Shaders, High Dynamic Range Rendering, etc.)
Has anybody else noticed this phenomenon? I was just wondering, because the second this game comes out I think there'll be a whole bunch of people asking "I have DX9 installed, why doesnt my copy look as good as the E3 vids?!?!"
Post your thoughts.
Recently, I have noticed a lack of comprehension among the masses when it comes to the difference between having Direct X 9 (DX9) installed and having a card that supports it. Why, just the other day I was talking to an acquaintance who insisted that Halo was a DX9 app because it required DX9 to be installed, and because it ran beautifuly on his computer, he assumed his GeForce 4 MX 440 was a DX9 card. This was not the only time, it has popped up with several people.
I tried to explain to him that just because the game requires DX9 doesn't mean it uses DX9's most important features (i.e Pixel Shaders, High Dynamic Range Rendering, etc.)
Has anybody else noticed this phenomenon? I was just wondering, because the second this game comes out I think there'll be a whole bunch of people asking "I have DX9 installed, why doesnt my copy look as good as the E3 vids?!?!"
Post your thoughts.