Bad^Hat
The Freeman
- Joined
- May 13, 2003
- Messages
- 19,983
- Reaction score
- 530
I know, another one of these threads, but I couldn't let this escape anyone's notice.
So, the Entertainment Software Association, the group responsible for representing the interests of many major games publishers (who have, most of them, already come out against the bill individually), have today dropped their support for SOPA.
Hear that you guys, they've been committed to helping pass "balanced legislation" from the beginning! Legislation which they now admit does not include SOPA. Wait, you mean the same SOPA that they were strongly in favour of just earlier this month, the SOPA that was pulled in it's current form just earlier today? Haha, that bill? Yeah, go **** yourselves, ESA.
So you might be thinking, well, the bill is dead for now, but it's inevitably going to come back in one form or another; maybe the ESA intended this as a long-term pledge to not support any such legislation? I wouldn't bet on it. The timing of this statement and the language they use is a dead giveaway. They stress that they want to support "balanced" legislation, which is exactly what the new bill will be flaunted as. They're going to repackage the bill, make a few concessions to popular concern, and present it as the new, internet friendly SOPA. Then who do you think will go right back to beating the anti-piracy drum? Organisations like ESA. This statement only serves one purpose, and that's to waylay justifiable concern about their position on this kind of legislation. They want to have their cake and **** it too.
What a bunch of spineless assholes.
So, the Entertainment Software Association, the group responsible for representing the interests of many major games publishers (who have, most of them, already come out against the bill individually), have today dropped their support for SOPA.
"From the beginning, ESA has been committed to the passage of balanced legislation to address the illegal theft of intellectual property found on foreign rogue sites," the group said in a statement released to media outlets. "Although the need to address this pervasive threat to our industry's creative investment remains, concerns have been expressed about unintended consequences stemming from the current legislative proposals.
"Accordingly, we call upon Congress, the Obama Administration, and stakeholders to refocus their energies on producing a solution that effectively balances both creative and technology interests. As an industry of innovators and creators, we understand the importance of both technological innovation and content protection and are committed to working with all parties to encourage a balanced solution."
Hear that you guys, they've been committed to helping pass "balanced legislation" from the beginning! Legislation which they now admit does not include SOPA. Wait, you mean the same SOPA that they were strongly in favour of just earlier this month, the SOPA that was pulled in it's current form just earlier today? Haha, that bill? Yeah, go **** yourselves, ESA.
So you might be thinking, well, the bill is dead for now, but it's inevitably going to come back in one form or another; maybe the ESA intended this as a long-term pledge to not support any such legislation? I wouldn't bet on it. The timing of this statement and the language they use is a dead giveaway. They stress that they want to support "balanced" legislation, which is exactly what the new bill will be flaunted as. They're going to repackage the bill, make a few concessions to popular concern, and present it as the new, internet friendly SOPA. Then who do you think will go right back to beating the anti-piracy drum? Organisations like ESA. This statement only serves one purpose, and that's to waylay justifiable concern about their position on this kind of legislation. They want to have their cake and **** it too.
What a bunch of spineless assholes.