Long, interesting read... What do you think?

It was the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. Both articles scream of insanity/delusion. This stuff is even more perposterous than the extreme 9/11 conspiracies. There really should be a humor forum added to this site so stuff like this can find its rightful home.
Gannon, according to investigators like Skolnick, is involved in high-level espionage and is also an expert on torture. He is said to be an expert penetration agent, using sex to compile negative data on U.S. and foreign governmental officials, and is also believed responsible for the Valerie Plame White House leak that allegedly caused 70 CIA undercover agents to be murdered.
:rolleyes:
 
you completely ignore the washington times scans from the first administration... Do some research.. The gannon/guckert/gosch involvement could very well be some nut jobs random musings, but you can not deny the franklin cover up... And the connections fit


I would be suprised that you even read the articles entirely.

And your quote above, whats so wrong with that? Gannon is ex military, how do you know what training the man has? And you would deny the vallary plume leak ever happened?
 
And your quote above, whats so wrong with that? Gannon is ex military, how do you know what training the man has?
I'm sorry, but this sounds like something a child could have written. The plot of Zoolander is more feasible than this.

you completely ignore the washington times scans from the first administration
Oh damn, I forgot. A newspaper published it so it must be true. :rolleyes: You must never visit the grocery store.

I would be suprised that you even read the articles entirely.
I read about 75%.
 
I offer you this challenge...

Show me 1 (one) single piece of evidence to the contrary, about gannon/guckert/gosch, OR the franklin coverup, then you will have a leg to stand on. One single peice of evidence to the contrary.
 
seinfeldrules said:
I'm sorry, but this sounds like something a child could have written. The plot of Zoolander is more feasible than this.


Oh damn, I forgot. A newspaper published it so it must be true. :rolleyes: You must never visit the grocery store.


I read about 75%.


Holy shit! Your post, its so wonderful... I'm a changed man... Damn I forgot that tabloids exist in the grocery store, silly me for thinking that the washington times hadn't ran a story on bat boy since well... they began printing!
 
Show me 1 (one) single piece of evidence to the contrary, about gannon/guckert/gosch, OR the franklin coverup, then you will have a leg to stand on. One single peice of evidence to the contrary.
I will not waste my time looking over such an outlandish story. Good lord, I cannot believe you take some of this stuff seriously. Do you forget that every president questioned is/was happily married? Nancy and Ronald had one of the most publicized and special relationships in documented White House history.
 
Well get the **** out the thread then, that simple. If your not going to "waste your time" then don't waste mine. And let me refer your little personal jab back to this from my first post:

Please don't bother if you haven't read the above... This is really odd. I'm not making claims to the validity of any of this, but just keeping an open mind about what could be. So in other words, don't try and discredit me or anything, its not going to work.
__________________
 
I never said anything even remotely close to not wanting opposing viewpoints in this thread... However

It was the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. Both articles scream of insanity/delusion. This stuff is even more perposterous than the extreme 9/11 conspiracies. There really should be a humor forum added to this site so stuff like this can find its rightful home.

Is hardly an opposing viewpoint, as you so eloquently put it, it seems more an attack on me and this thread simply because you don't agree with whats in it.

From Article The paper's editors say its only purpose is to provide a conservative alternative to The Post.

very good, you send me a post article about the times, the posts main competition... Ok I'll except this, and admit that I wasn't aware of who ran the times, but let me ask you, whats makes this not a conspiracy as well?

Also you have yet to elude to anything in the article itself, it seems your more content attacking me and the times than anything written... And oh yeah, the two articles i've posted, they aren't from the times...
 
I firmly believe that Jeff Gannon is Johnny Gauss (sp?). However, I think he plays a very small role in this huge, government-ran child slavery ring.

Not long ago congresswoman McKinney drilled Rumsfield in regards to this. The Defense Department is still handing out contracts to Dyncorp, who were CAUGHT kidnapping women and children and selling them off to malaysian prostitution circles.

Here's the link to the video that was aired on c-span:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2005/240305mckinneygrills.htm

Unfortunately this seems to be happening everywhere. As crazy as it sounds, there was an incident where a mass grave was found with several bodies with their hearts and other organs missing. Mexicans crossing the border are smuggling guns, drugs, women and children and participating in satanic rituals; praying to the devil for protection from the police!

http://www.skepticfiles.org/weird/matamoro.htm

You can find other articles relating to this...Just do a google search for "bodies found satantic cults texas border". It's old news but it plays a very important part in helping us see the bigger picture.

Also, wasn't there a scandel during the first Bush Administration where some Represenative was caught holding midnight tours of the white house to underaged call boys? I don't have a link for this one, so maybe someone can clarify.
 
Also you have yet to elude to anything in the article itself, it seems your more content attacking me and the times than anything written... And oh yeah, the two articles i've posted, they aren't from the times...

You have yet to explain what motivation Reagan and Bush (s) would have for cheating on their loving wives with 'college call boys'. Such claims are so outlandish that common sense should be rebuttal enough. Hell, if he was gay then wouldnt he be pushing for acceptance of gay marriage?
 
seinfeldrules said:
You have yet to explain what motivation Reagan and Bush (s) would have for cheating on their loving wives with 'college call boys'. Such claims are so outlandish that common sense should be rebuttal enough. Hell, if he was gay then wouldnt he be pushing for acceptance of gay marriage?
I'm as sceptical about it all as you. Particularly because the Satanic child abuse stories kicking about in the 80s were urban myths. But I do feel the need to point out that the vast majority of people who are sexually abused are abused by thier own family. ie. fathers, grandfathers, etc. What I mean to say is, pedophiles are usually married and have loving, sexual relationships with their wife.
 
seinfeldrules said:
You have yet to explain what motivation Reagan and Bush (s) would have for cheating on their loving wives with 'college call boys'. Such claims are so outlandish that common sense should be rebuttal enough. Hell, if he was gay then wouldnt he be pushing for acceptance of gay marriage?


Seinfeld, buddy listen, you missed my point. I didn't point fingers, I gave some articles I found... Ok so maybe they elude to bush/reagan involvement, but the meat of this thread is, is gannon, johnny gosch? There is no denying that something shady is going on with this guckert/gannon guy... Could he be connected somehow to the young boy that was really kidnapped in the 80's? He has similar birthmarks, similar scars, is the appropriate age, same eye/hair blah blah... Thats what I find interesting... And if he is, then who was involved?

I'm sorry you think this is so outlandish, and yes, you trumped me fair and square on the washtimes, I'm not completely familiar with them. But none of the two articles the thread is about is from the times, one of them just uses a scan of it....

Sorry for coming off rude early in the thread... I've had a long week. Your opinion is yours and I respect it. Good day.
 
interesting read,, John Kerry, George Bush 'Scull and bones' .. need I say more...? people have asked them questions on their secret club, and they simply dont comment.. what would Bush's daughter's think :O?

http://www.nytimes.com/library/politics/camp/061000wh-bush.html

Mr. Bush got a crucial helping hand in life because of his name and family connections. Otherwise, he would probably not have been admitted to Andover and then Yale.

This question of privilege is one that rankles Mr. Bush, and when he was asked about it in a long interview about his past, he became prickly.

"I think I'm asked that all the time," Mr. Bush scolded. "It's interesting, they always use the word 'Smith,' too." He deepened and modulated his voice to mimic a television interviewer: " 'Would you be standing here as presidential candidate if your name were George Smith?' Well, you know, it's not George Smith. It is George Bush. And how did it influence? I don't have any idea."

bush got into yale because of daddy

bush got his own oil buisness because of daddy

bush was a male cheerleader!? who dressed in drag :eek:

this is interesting stuff that is never mentioned.. why..? if he was priminister instead of president it would be all over the news sooner or later. lol
 
The perpetraters of the 1980s white house scandal were not Bush and Reagan themselves, rather the workers in their administration. That is important.
 
Back
Top