medal of honor vs call of duty

JiMbOb

Newbie
Joined
Oct 18, 2004
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Now ive got Halflife 2 incredible game. But now christamas has come up and im stuck on a decision. Call of duty: finest hour on ps2 or medal of honor: pacific assault on the pc. Ive played both cod on the pc and moh on ps2 and pc all were great but on this one im stuck.

now these being diferent platforms please dont base any comment on graphics please place it purely on gameplay of the singleplayer and possibly multiplayer any advice would be greatly appreciated.

JB
 
Don't take this the wrong way - but both are pretty average/poor games imo. There's plenty of better titles out for both systems.

MoH looks very dated these days, and wasn't that good when it first came out.
 
Finest Hour is honestly one of the first fps shooters I've played [on xbox].

go with mohpa.
 
cod is GREAT on pc, SUCKS on ps2, dont bother with ps2, get the cod and the expansion pack, you wont be disapointed.
 
I never really play WWII shooters.. waiting for DoD: Source though
 
you might like cod on pc, but on console it's a completely different matter.
 
:dozey: Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault was pretty good, it drew me in with amazement, but in real gameplay it was pretty frustrating. I haven't played CoD: UO but since it's an expansion and most of the features are most likely the same, i'd pick MoH: PA.
 
Get Call Of Duty for PC and the expansion pack United Offensive. DO NOT get MOHPA, it average at best. Many sites gave COD over 9.0's. and Game Of The Year awards. Plus the online MP is amazing.
 
Farrowlesparrow said:
Damnit the men who fought in the war had to live it out, and so do you!


:P

They only went through it once... we go through the d day landing dozens times through out the mediocre barrarge of ww2 shooters.

Vets had it easy...


...I am of course kidding.
 
COD PC, and to a lesser extent UO (I was tired of it by then anyways). Finest Hour... um, has a cool ad :D
 
Back
Top