sinkoman
Party Escort Bot
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2004
- Messages
- 7,457
- Reaction score
- 21
I went over this with a friend today (co05).
Let's say you had an invisible cloak.
THIS IS ALL HYPOTHETICAL, OK? So don't bring any sort of morale bullshit into this.
Now, let's say you were entirely invisible. Now, you go to class/work, and begin to sexually stimulate a random woman whilst invisible. This woman has absolutely NO clue that there's a person there, she just realizes that she's being stimulated, somehow.
Now, you know that "sexually uncomfortable" feeling? That emotion that kicks in when somebody crosses that sexual barrier, and everything just feels awkward and uncomfortable?
Don't lie to me, of course you do.
Now, does this act incite said emotion in the woman?
The underlying question, is, "must there be a visual cue to mentally signal to the abused that the sexual stimulation is from a sexually unwelcome party? Even though the woman is being abused, is it possible for her mind to make the connection without the actual visual cue?"
Here's another analogy for you. You get a boner when you look at porn. When you look at enough, you get that giddy "sexually ready to esplode" feeling. Now, what if instead there was some fat greasy woman, invisible, sexually stimulating your dangly bits? Is the mind capable of connecting "random boner" to "sexually unwanted action", without having the visual cue that the action is from an unwelcome party? Or is it purely the fact that there is random sexual stimulation whilst the party is unwilling to participate, be it from a random metaphysical entity, or a fat chick in an invisible sweatshirt.
Your thoughts? The whole "sexual abuse" analogies seemed to be the best way to pose the question, it's really more basic, and can be asexual or sexual in nature.
Let's say you had an invisible cloak.
THIS IS ALL HYPOTHETICAL, OK? So don't bring any sort of morale bullshit into this.
Now, let's say you were entirely invisible. Now, you go to class/work, and begin to sexually stimulate a random woman whilst invisible. This woman has absolutely NO clue that there's a person there, she just realizes that she's being stimulated, somehow.
Now, you know that "sexually uncomfortable" feeling? That emotion that kicks in when somebody crosses that sexual barrier, and everything just feels awkward and uncomfortable?
Don't lie to me, of course you do.
Now, does this act incite said emotion in the woman?
The underlying question, is, "must there be a visual cue to mentally signal to the abused that the sexual stimulation is from a sexually unwelcome party? Even though the woman is being abused, is it possible for her mind to make the connection without the actual visual cue?"
Here's another analogy for you. You get a boner when you look at porn. When you look at enough, you get that giddy "sexually ready to esplode" feeling. Now, what if instead there was some fat greasy woman, invisible, sexually stimulating your dangly bits? Is the mind capable of connecting "random boner" to "sexually unwanted action", without having the visual cue that the action is from an unwelcome party? Or is it purely the fact that there is random sexual stimulation whilst the party is unwilling to participate, be it from a random metaphysical entity, or a fat chick in an invisible sweatshirt.
Your thoughts? The whole "sexual abuse" analogies seemed to be the best way to pose the question, it's really more basic, and can be asexual or sexual in nature.
