unozero
Tank
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Messages
- 3,449
- Reaction score
- 1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
People give a shit about what Savage thinks?
...
Oh crap, I forgot. They do.
Call him by his birthname, people.
"Michael Weiner on Obama speach."
Yes, because his name is the only thing you could come up to use against him, isn't it?
I completely forgot about this (my god! We did something right! Okay I don't really think that) and then I looked it up on wikipedia. Turns out that section of the article is written with an evident and hilarious bias. The way it sequences facts, and the language in which they're presented, implicate that Michael Savage caused Jacqui Smith to resignBritain gives a shit. That's why he's banned from entering
Of the banning, the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, wrote: "America still has a constitutional protection of free speech, and I have been amazed... to see how few people in this country are willing to stick up for that elementary principle... a country once famous for free speech is now hysterically and expensively sensitive to anything that could be taken as a slight".[84] In The Guardian, Catherine Bennett wrote: "The ban on Savage is so far from being a comprehensible act, so staggeringly capricious and stupid, as to defy evaluation."[85]. While Sam Leith wrote: "Barring this shock-jock from Britain risks turning a rabid blabbermouth into a beacon for free speech."[50] An editorial in the Daily Mail stated: "The move appears to have backfired spectacularly at a time when [Jacqui Smith's] job is already hanging by a thread after a string of expense scandals."[86] One month later the same newspaper reported that Ms. Smith was to resign her position as Home Secretary, and to be replaced.
I wasn't aware that Michael Savage's belligerent, obnoxious spew was deserving of serious refutation.