New AMDs

[Pressure]

I read on another site that this is the road map for AMDs new line of processors.

AMD Athlon 64 4200+ @ 2.60 GHz 90nm w/ 512k L2 cache (Winchester Core) Q1 of 2005
AMD Athlon 64 4400+ @ 2.80 GHz 90nm w/ 512k L2 cache (Winchester Core) Q2 of 2005
AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 2.80 GHz 90nm w/ 1MB L2 cache (San Diego Core) Q2 of 2005
AMD Athlon 64 FX-59 @ 3.00 GHz 90nm w/ 1MB L2 cache (San Diego Core) Q3 of 2005
AMD Athlon 64 FX-61 @ 3.20 GHz 90nm w/ 1MB L2 cache (San Diego Core) Q4 of 2005
AMD Athlon 64 FX-63 Dual Core @ 2.20+ GHz per/core w/ 90nm w/ 2MB L2 cache (Toledo Core) Q2 of 2005
AMD Opteron Dual Core @ 2.20+ GHz per/core w/ 90nm w/ 2MB L2 cache (Toledo Core) Q2 of 2005

Anyone know if it's true

 

[[Matt]]

The information in regards to the core architecture looks accurate to me but the time slace on some of them looks a little off. Afaik the toledo core isn't due until late Q3 at the earliest... What site was this information from???

 

[Pressure]

http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/35085/

 

[MiccyNarc]

The dual core probably costs both my arms and legs.

 

[Eg.]

i would think that they would only cost a littl more, there meant to replace the single a64's and such, just as the 939's did the 745's

 

[Hazar]

The dual core probably costs both my arms and legs.

Don't forget that you have to remorgage your house in addition to that.

 

[Pressure]

Don't forget that you have to remorgage your house in addition to that.

And kill one newly born baby.

 

[bosox188]

I don't think it's true because do you really think they would release FOUR FX's during the span of 2005? After all once they only have one FX made at a time, once a new one comes out the older one is no longer made. So I find it hard to believe that we will see four Athlon FX's come out during 2005, that would mean each of them would have a pretty short time being made until the next one comes out.

 

[bryanf445]

what socket is this going to be? and i am going with bosox on this one...what would be the point of releasing them so close to the other ones...

 

[Eg.]

http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_608,00.html

wow, was it that hard to find?

 

[Cole]

Yes, yes it was.

 

[Tr0n]

The dual core probably costs both my arms and legs.

*gets his chainsaw*

I have dibs on the arms.

 

[WhiteZero]

Anyone know what kind of compatabilit issues Dual-Cores will have? Like, will game developers have to work around it, or will they mainly just work like a normal processor, so devs dont have to make special code?

 

[[Matt]]

Anyone know what kind of compatabilit issues Dual-Cores will have? Like, will game developers have to work around it, or will they mainly just work like a normal processor, so devs dont have to make special code?

They will more than likely work like a dual CPU system. And I severely doubt the authenticity of these roadmaps because they're on a geocities site. Anyone could make any claim and publish it on geocities...

 

[Pressure]

Someone translate this for me .

http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_608,00.html

 

[[Matt]]

Someone translate this for me .

http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_608,00.html

Those maybe true but they mention NOTHING of core speeds or retail CPU names. Hence i'm more inclined to believe those geocities are falsified.