Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And virustype, the Fatal1ty mouses suck in performance. There was a review on the reading performance of all current mice but I lost the link in a reformat. Asus can probably link you there.
My recommendation to anyone would still be the Logitech MX518 or the Razer Diamondback.
2020 said:2400 cpi HD-Laser Engine
6.4 Megapixel Per Second Tracking
Tracks up to 20g's of movement acceleration
G-Weight Interchangeable Weight System
USB 1.1 and 2.0 Compatible
1000Hz USB polling supported
Ehm no it's about $35 and it still outperforms any new mouse out there (especially the laser crap). 1600dpi is more than enough.
ANd yes, it does suck. SOMEONE POST THAT LINK plz.
edit: yays finally found it myself http://www.esreality.com/?a=longpost&id=1265679&page=1
Yeah, thats the two I can't choose between. the mx518 or the mx500.No I recommend the MX518 over the MX500 or MX510, simply because its DPI is 1600. The mx500 only has 400 and mx510 has 800.
According to gotfrag, most lan players use the M$ IntelliMouse explorer 3.0
http://hardware.gotfrag.com/portal/story/34387/
Seriously WTF at those stats Virus posted.
And why is the mx510 not on there, is it to similar to the mx500 or mx518 to be specifically listed.
And what program did that guy use for those tests. Because his findings are pretty much disputed by every other review I have come across.
One tricks that was tucked away up some sleeves until recently was how to change the USB polling rate to faster than the Windows default of 125hz. For all intents and purposes the default 125hz polling rate has a 8ms built in response time (lag) that cannot be overcome without changing the usbport.sys file. If you change the polling rate to 250hz your mouse response time drops to 4ms. At 500hz it drops to 2ms and 1000HZ it drops to 1ms. This is an obvious advantage in a gaming environment. Some Logitech and Microsoft mice also have a huge performance boost when you overclock the mouse port, because of an interface limit related to the 8-bit data bus. Specifically they are: Logitech's MX300, MX500 & MX510 and Microsoft's WMO, IE3.0 & Laser 6000. My recommendation is to set the USB rate to 500Hz for these mice. However increasing the reporting rate of any mouse will benefit from smoother tracking and faster response, however not all mice will dramatically reduce negative acceleration and improve perfect control like these do.
I have the mx510 (actually I have two lol), the mx518 and the razer copperhead. mx518 > mx510 > razer copperhead.
The guy explained the way he tested in the article, read it.
Edit: btw 400dpi doesn't only mean it's slower. it also means that it's less precise at the same mouse speeds. Lower resolution mice skip pixels when you try to aim precisely. With 1600dpi or higher it's perfectly smooth even at high sensitivities. Especially with sniping etc this is very nice.
I have the mx510 (actually I have two lol), the mx518 and the razer copperhead. mx518 > mx510 > razer copperhead.
The guy explained the way he tested in the article, read it.
Edit: btw 400dpi doesn't only mean it's slower. it also means that it's less precise at the same mouse speeds. Lower resolution mice skip pixels when you try to aim precisely. With 1600dpi or higher it's perfectly smooth even at high sensitivities. Especially with sniping etc this is very nice.
Yes but that's just because at the same sensitivity, a lower dpi means slower movement. Some people find it easier to aim when it's a bit slower I guess.I thought people turned their dpi down when sniping, from 1600/2000 to 400 for example. Thats why some mouses have that dpi switch button.
Could you explain further why his testing method is skewed/ doesn't take things in to account.
All other mouse reviews I've seen are based on opinions, including how they felt the sensor performed. How the reviewer uses his mouse when testing it in games may not show faults with the sensor or give you much info. An opinion is the only way to review most of the things about a mouse and you should probably read several to get an idea about how it feels. But having the sensor actually benchmarked is a huge plus since the info is consistent and detailed.And what program did that guy use for those tests. Because his findings are pretty much disputed by every other review I have come across.
Barney it's not only about precision here. The difference between 1600 and 2000dpi is pretty small. And I do have experience with laser mice because I have and used a razer copperhead for a few months and I've played at friends who have the G5. Just slowly moving around or for precision aiming it doesn't make a bit of difference if you have an optical of a laser mouse. I'm a fanatic quake 3 player and I DID notice the speed limit of the copperhead. The performance of laser vs optical is the same or worse for the laser. Also the optical ones are a lot cheaper. Can't go wrong with the mx518. Also I can do headshots just fine in css with my mx518
I don't know whether I misquoted you or not, I was talking about migrating from ball to laser.
A relative had one of those HP laser mouse long time ago when laser first started coming out, and this thing he used was all over the place, once the mouse is moved an inch.
Ever since that first expression; I could not settle with giving it another chance, till I bought the G5 and getting sick of constant socket cleaning.
The first time I used the G5 online, I had 31 head-shots in one map of SOF2 sniping. extremely precise peace of hardware.
Then I asked myself; how did I play without it?
I want the links virus. But I want to know if you can overclock the ps/2 port to 1000 mhz to, and what about usb 1.1.
And I also have an external hd hooked up to my USB 2.0 ports, will overcloking the usb have any negative effect on that.
According to gotfrag, most lan players use the M$ IntelliMouse explorer 3.0
http://hardware.gotfrag.com/portal/story/34387/
Funneh. I read this article yesterday and today I found out one of my colleagues has one on his desk. Better still: he has two more at home. Don't be surprised if you find a couple of these mice on eBay tonight.
Oh I thought you were comparing moving from optical to laser with ball to optical.
Btw you sound like a reviewer. You like the mouse a lot so you praise it into heaven, unknown that the older optical mice are technically better.
Btw I thought the first laser mouse was the mx1000? Well at least the first I knew about.
I kinda have to lol at the whole mouse OC thing.
I'd install the software and driver package if i were you. Driver updates etc often include updates for tracking on different surfaces etc.