CptStern
suckmonkey
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 10,303
- Reaction score
- 62
Based on my experience with the OnLive gaming service, it appears to work well for certain types of games. In my testing I found that games that were slower paced, or at least had slower paced input mechanisms, played well enough that I could be fooled into thinking I was playing on a modestly configured local gaming system. Both Burnout: Paradise and Tom Clancy's HAWX seemed to be completely playable on both my home PC and my notebook computer.
Obviously the games that didn't work were the fast paced shooter games: Unreal Tournament 3, Crysis and even Call of Juarez. If you are an avid PC gamer you will likely be very disappointed by the experience, both in terms of image quality and input latency, of playing these types of games using OnLive. This is especially true if you use a keyboard and mouse - using a game pad did mute the adverse effects quite a bit and made the game (and my apparent skill) more acceptable.
My first hands-on experience with OnLive turned out to be better than I thought it would be going into the experiment. Both Burnout: Paradise and Tom Clancy's HAWX provided an acceptable gaming experience through the streaming game service. Both titles did look a little less impressive when placed side by side with a locally installed copy of each game but that is probably always going to be the case. Unreal Tournament 3 was less impressive - actually it was awful to be blunt about it. Some of that could be a result of our latency warnings every time we started the OnLive client and living outside the southern California area, but regardless, playing UT3 with OnLive was not anything I would recommend to experienced or beginning gamers.
very detailed review. you guys should read it (1% of you actually will). remember this is still beta so there's always room for improvement on the latency front. this looks like it'll be a reality sooner rather than later
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=859&type=expert&pid=1