Overpopulated?

Would you?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 9 30.0%
  • No.

    Votes: 21 70.0%

  • Total voters
    30

xcellerate

Tank
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
3,961
Reaction score
1
How do yall feel about the population of the town/city/state/country/world? And just for fun there's a poll, the question is: If you could reduce the population of the world via disease/magic, but you and your loved one's have the same chance of contracting the disease/magic as everybody else on the planet, would you?

Personally, i feel like there are too many people in this world. Stolen from wikipedia (yay):

The world's current agricultural production, if it were distributed evenly, would be sufficient to feed everyone living on the Earth today. However, many critics hold that, in the absence of other measures, simply feeding the world's population well would only make matters worse, natural growth will cause the population to grow to unsustainable levels, and will result directly in famines and deforestation and indirectly in pandemic disease and war.

Some other characteristics of overpopulation:

* People struggling to live under poor conditions
* Low birth rate due to the inability of mothers to get enough resources to sustain a baby from fertilization to birth
* Low life expectancy
* Low level of literacy
* High rate of unemployment in urban areas (leading to social problems)
* Insufficient arable land
* Little surplus food
* Poor diet with ill health and diet-deficiency diseases (e.g. rickets)
* Low Per Capita GDP
* Low level of capital formation
* Unhygienic living conditions for many
* Economically stretched government
* High crime from people who steal resources to survive
* Mass extinctions of plants and animals as habitats are used for farming and human settlements
* Decreasing human population towards equilibrium
* Inflationary pressures
* Increase in the dependency burden due to the greater number of younger people in the population

According to projections by the Population Division of the United Nations revised in 2004 [6], the population of the world will stabilize at 9.1 billion by 2050 due to demographic transition. The UN has consistently revised its population projections downwards over the last 10 years. Birth rates are now falling in most developing countries, while the population in many developed countries would also fall without immigration [7].

David Pimentel, a professor of ecology and agricultural sciences at Cornell University, predicts that population outcomes for the 22nd century range from 2 billion people (characterised as thriving in harmony with the environment), to 12 billion people (characterised as miserable and suffering a difficult life with limited resources and widespread famine). [8]
 
I just have one question. If we're living on the moon, do we still have moon pies? Or are they earth pies? And are they going to be expensive?

I see no poll.
 
The world is overpopulated in various areas of course, some areas are extremely sparsely populated. So yes we are, but we got more room still! Biggest problem is supporting the numbers rather than space though i guess. So far we are managing to keep up with technological advances and high yielding crops, but i'm sure there will come a time where the population explosion will stabilise...it must.

This forum has too many people on it too, 2 banned yesterday though, so i suppose the culling is going well heh.
 
How could anyone answer yes to the poll :|

It's basically saying "Would you risk losing your loved ones to help a problem that isn't going to affect you during any of your lifetime, and may fix itself anyway?"
 
Birth Control and off world colonization are the answers to overpopulation. There are no other reasonable alternatives in the foreseeable future.
 
Something I specifically request from my smart friends is that they adopt, not procreate.

My concern is only partly that I want to keep world population down. Mainly, I just remember my childhood. It's altogether better if my friends do something good for children that already exist than if they let the preexisting kids go and make some of their own.

Of course, whether the world is overpopulated or not, I'd prefer a smaller population to a larger one.
 
It would be nice if some of the major stoners were gone. I dont mind the minor stoners but the major ones kind of get on my nerves.

And you know what a solution to overpopulation would be? I could say the two words but I fear the worst for me if I speak them.
 
madog said:
It would be nice if some of the major stoners were gone. I dont mind the minor stoners but the major ones kind of get on my nerves.
The world is full of rapists and murderers, traitors and sickos, and all you care about are the stoners. No wait, not ALL stoners, just the major ones.

:laugh:

(I'm completely against smoking or any kind of drug doing btw)
 
vegeta897 said:
How could anyone answer yes to the poll :|

It's basically saying "Would you risk losing your loved ones to help a problem that isn't going to affect you during any of your lifetime, and may fix itself anyway?"


easy: in my lifetime the world's population has doubled
 
We're all dead soon so it doesn't really matter.
 
But come on, your own family members :|

You would have to be pretty damn selfless to care that much about over population to have your family members die.
 
vegeta897 said:
You would have to be pretty damn selfless to care that much about over population to have your family members die.
I assure you, it would be a blessing upon humanity if my family died. I envy you people who think there's any justification for valuing family ties; I've never found one.

There are very few people I would be unwilling to put at risk for the sake of the world, and even they would willingly risk themselves for it.
 
? where did you get that from? the poll asks if the world is overpopulated ...yes it is. It's not clear what he's asking but I didnt think he was saying fix the overpopulation problem by killing those close to you ...condoms would be a good start ..no need to kill people

pesmerga: mid 30's
 
Raeven0 said:
I assure you, it would be a blessing upon humanity if my family died. I envy you people who think there's any justification for valuing family ties; I've never found one.

There are very few people I would be unwilling to put at risk for the sake of the world, and even they would willingly risk themselves for it.
That's quite unfortunate for you. :(


CptStern said:
? where did you get that from? the poll asks if the world is overpopulated
Uh... No? Read the post...

And, as if it was as easy as just handing out condoms to everyone in the entire world, Stern. I saw a documentary on overpopulation a couple weeks ago, and there is little we can do.
 
**** yes. Pirate magic. As in, I unleash pirates upon the world.
 
Raeven0 said:
I assure you, it would be a blessing upon humanity if my family died. I envy you people who think there's any justification for valuing family ties; I've never found one.

The only part of my family that I care about is my direct family. Stepbrothers, halfbrothers, sister, father, and mother. I couldn't care less about anyone else, but that doesn't mean I think we should "limit" our population. Life will find a way.
 
CptStern said:
easy: in my lifetime the world's population has doubled

Pesmerga said:
Are you like, 100?

If he's in his 30's - 40's it's quite plausible.

pop_growth.jpg
 
We all know less developed countries don't actually matter.
 
Three babies a second? whoah. that's like...

*poppoppop*
*poppoppop*
*poppoppop*

and then that's three seconds D:
 
Que-Ever said:
*poppoppop*
*poppoppop*
*poppoppop*

and then that's three seconds D:
Clearly a professional and accurate representation of population growth. Take notes.
 
*doodles Que-Ever in a bikini, folds the paper into an airplane and throws it at him*
 
I'm hot for myself.
Anyway, no, I wouldn't. I just don't think I could make a choice like that- so I won't. Of course, if I had control over who dies... *turns into Devil-Jeff*
 
Why does the population matter if were all going to die anyway?
 
madog said:
Why does the population matter if were all going to die anyway?

Stop talking, I prefer not to hear such nihilistic ramblings. There are far worse tragedies than death.
 
Pesmerga said:
Stop talking, I prefer not to hear such nihilistic ramblings. There are far worse tragedies than death.

Very well, however I wasn't referring to death in that way and what I was saying is certainly not nihiilistic. But what ragedy is worse than death?
 
madog said:
Very well, however I wasn't referring to death in that way and what I was saying is certainly not nihiilistic. But what ragedy is worse than death?

What do you mean, "in that way"? Worse than death tragedy... four years in a concentration camp? Being unable to save the one you love? Eternal damnation, burning in the inferno's fires for all of time?
 
Yes. I'd give mine, everyone's I know, and a couple billion others' lives if I could. I would only do it if it meant that humanity would never have this problem again, the population would stay at around 2-3 billion people, and food/resources/living conditions would be spread more equally and all that BS that is NEVER going to happen in reality...Oh yeah and no one would be fat :frown: unless it's some kinda health issue...

Kinda pointless if I'm not there to see it though...whatever I don't really mean all that, just thinking...
 
Idonotbelonghere said:
Kinda pointless if I'm not there to see it though...whatever I don't really mean all that, just thinking...

It's only human :P

I ... guess I wouldn't, because I know life will find a way, and it's better if life finds out the hard way.
 
Hell no, I even think that we need a birth tax to raise our population.


I mean, 8 million available fighting force (male and female, 20% of each age group ranging from 15 ~ 40) is just not enough.
 
If we die because of overpopulation, then obviously it's because we ****ed up somewhere big. Then we have to invent time machines and go back in time and fix this horrendeous problem.
 
Elephants and Cows will inherit the earth. Mark my words.
 
I don't think overpopulation is something we need to worry about. Once we reach about ten billion people, the number of deaths will equal the number of births per year, so the population will stay constant at that mark. We have enough resources to provide for ten billion people, so we're not going to suddenly find ourselves shoulder-to-shoulder, eating meager rations some day.

Also, squids will inherit the Earth. Don't you watch Discovery Channel? They had a show on "Animals of the Future" once. 'Course...one of those squids WAS the size of an elephant...
 
Back
Top