Blackthorn
Newbie
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 1,617
- Reaction score
- 3
So you just decided to totally disregard about what I said about the strength of mentally unstable people, huh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
In the time he took to ready his weapon he could have tackled him or stopped him an a non-lethal fashion. All it would have taken is a shove the cop would have all the time he needed to subdue him.
So you just decided to totally disregard about what I said about the strength of mentally unstable people, huh?
bullshit. How far away was he? Were there any low walls in between them? Was there knee-deep mud?
Stop talking out your ass you don't know how it went down.
I got lucky in assuming the officer wasn't a trigger-happy idiot in other words?In most circumstances however, the officer would have had a chance to subdue the suspect in a non-lethal way. You just got lucky in assuming there was obstacles in his way.
Since when was the kid innocent? Did anybody get it's side of the story? I bet that little bastard started it all.
Well, he did speak of the boy being filled with demons. Who knows, maybe he was killing the anti-christ.
Funny thing is that at first, i thought that "Police shoot man as he beats toddler" was the cop beating the kid.
They should have tazed the penis.
Lol, why the hell did they have to shoot the guy. Crazy gun hick American police officers.
Its pretty ****ed up but they clearly didn't need to shoot him, nice to get rid of a sick ****er tho.
THANK YOU. I mean shit, that's a great ****ing idea, and people said I was ****ing crazy to say that tazing the penis was the answer to life's problems!They should have tazed the penis.
The kid might have been at his legs, also, he could still hit the kid after being shot in the legs.I would shoot him, but not to kill him. Shoot him several times in the legs, in the arms, and maybe one stray towards his bollocks
And the minority have the experience in shooting teenagers lollololololI don't think the majority of the people in this thread know how hard it is to hit a target in the limbs while he's wildly flailing them around. The cop could easily have been aiming for his arm or shoulder when the guy suddenly turned a bit and got hit in the chest.
I don't think the majority of the people in this thread know how hard it is to hit a target in the limbs while he's wildly flailing them around. The cop could easily have been aiming for his arm or shoulder when the guy suddenly turned a bit and got hit in the chest.
out on some farmer's dirt road out in bum****, there wasn't much chance of an ambulance to rush there, especially not after kicking babies to death... doesn't exactly make the ambulance driver rush to the scene
Yes they did! ****er was stomping a toddler. Riddle him with bullets.Lol, why the hell did they have to shoot the guy. Crazy gun hick American police officers.
Its pretty ****ed up but they clearly didn't need to shoot him, nice to get rid of a sick ****er tho.