Vigilante
Newbie
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2003
- Messages
- 2,660
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Can anyone confirm that the demo runs better than the beta?
Despite not enjoying QW as much as RTCW and ET, i'm still tempted to pick up. It'll never be the great clan game the previous two were, but should be a laugh with a few mates. Still poos on BF
prove it, lets see some hi res videos or some decent gameplay thats proves us wrong. I havent played a minute of it, so I cant be taken too seriously, but just on looks and what I have seen, I think its junk
I can tell some of you played for a few mins and gave up ..the game is head and shoulders above bf2 ..the complexity is what turns people off but there's far more to do than any other fps I've ever played ..there's a hundred ways to win a map ...but people would rather spend their time running and gunning ..oh and the maps are optomised for 24 players ..the fact that someone mentioned that not having 32 players is a negative tells me the person hasnt played the game ..24 players is the ideal set up for a server ..anything else just becomes the killing fields where you're constantly bombarded by artillery or killed as soon as you leave the spawn area
I was really hyped about this game, the screenshots looked amazing but the game looked no where near that quality, not only that but everyone runs at about 40mph, there is no stamina so everyone is bouncing off walls and roofs like some annoying moth on a street lamp. Team play... nah, more like rush and spam health/grenades/spray and what is with the sounds? I've never heard such horrible sound effects!
It's a weak game, highly over rated, I blame the media more than ID for falsly claiming it as the "Battlefield Killer" when it's a completely different game - it is mod for Quake, nothing more.
/Rant