Racial Traits

Uriel

Tank
Joined
Jul 26, 2005
Messages
3,699
Reaction score
0
Curious, I know certain races have certain physical traits. Most Blacks have big lips, Italians have black hair, etc.

My genology ends on my fathers side very early, his grandpa was a bastard child. My family on one side has a distictive look. Wonder if theres anyway I could tell where their heritage is from by their physical traits.
 
Oooh I think u hit a taboo subject here. Then again while you are right...i can see people getting upset about this. I will say something for the record that you didnt so no one gets mad.

Race has to do with the way you look not the way you act or what you believe!!!

I will clear something up though...religion is not race ok! So dont say well Im Jewish (which i am) and well I have a big nose. its not cause your Jewish you ****tard! ;)

So do not get offended at all!

Anyway my mom is from Istanbul, Turkey and my dads from jersey. I have thick eyebrows, fairly tan skin thick brown curly hair. I take most my traits from my mom.
 
Hmm, a study was actually taken on guys wangs (grow up watermelon34)

Biggest to smallest, this order

Africa
Australia
South American countries
Canada
USA
Europe
Asia
Japan ( i kid you not)

thats all I know for sure, except asian people all have black hair (unless dyed)
 
the_rebel_medic said:
Hmm, a study was actually taken on guys wangs (grow up watermelon34)

Biggest to smallest, this order

Africa
Australia

South American countries
Canada
USA
Europe
Asia
Japan ( i kid you not)

thats all I know for sure, except asian people all have black hair (unless dyed)

*Looks in pants*

Yeah that makes sense.
 
I suddenly feel...average...

I also have no clue about my family tree beyond two-three past generations...
 
and to be honest does it require a discussion?
diversity is less boring
 
I know to 40+ generations of my heritage.

I'm decended from a General/king.
 
wow thats quite a fall - royalty to propagandist, so terrible
:E
 
Uriel said:
Curious, I know certain races have certain physical traits. Most Blacks have big lips, Italians have black hair, etc.

My genology ends on my fathers side very early, his grandpa was a bastard child. My family on one side has a distictive look. Wonder if theres anyway I could tell where their heritage is from by their physical traits.


you're treading on a slippery slope here

there is one race: human

there are subspecies:

800px-Races_all.JPG


but race as a identifiable marker that differentiates us between groups of people has no basis in fact:

"The American Anthropological Association, drawing on biological research, states that "The concept of race is a social and cultural construction. . . . Race simply cannot be tested or proven scientifically," and that, "It is clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. The concept of 'race' has no validity . . . in the human species."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race#Race_as_subspecies
 
john3571000 said:
wow thats quite a fall - royalty to propagandist, so terrible
:E

:LOL:

The new world order, you know? :E


Anyway, I'm not a nazi, btw, since this came up. Don't believe sulky.
 
Some interesting points that everyone should be taught at a young age, regardless of their "race":
1. All humans living today belong to a single species, Homo sapiens, and share a common descent. Although there are differences of opinion regarding how and where different human groups diverged or fused to form new ones from a common ancestral group, all living populations in each of the earth's geographic areas have evolved from that ancestral group over the same amount of time. Much of the biological variation among populations involves modest degrees of variation in the frequency of shared traits. Human populations have at times been isolated, but have never genetically diverged enough to produce any biological barriers to mating between members of different populations.

2. Biological differences between human beings reflect both hereditary factors and the influence of natural and social environments. In most cases, these differences are due to the interaction of both. The degree to which environment or heredity affects any particular trait varies greatly.

3. There is great genetic diversity within all human populations. Pure races, in the sense of genetically homogenous populations, do not exist in the human species today, nor is there any evidence that they have ever existed in the past.

4. There are obvious physical differences between populations living in different geographic areas of the world. Some of these differences are strongly inherited and others, such as body size and shape, are strongly influenced by nutrition, way of life, and other aspects of the environment. Genetic differences between populations commonly consist of differences in the frequencies of all inherited traits, including those that are environmentally malleable.

...

10. There is no necessary concordance between biological characteristics and culturally defined groups. On every continent, there are diverse populations that differ in language, economy, and culture. There is no national, religious, linguistic or cultural group or economic class that constitutes a race. However, human beings who speak the same language and share the same culture frequently select each other as mates, with the result that there is often some degree of correspondence between the distribution of physical traits on the one hand and that of linguistic and cultural traits on the other. But there is no causal linkage between these physical and behavioral traits, and therefore it is not justifiable to attribute cultural characteristics to genetic inheritance.
Source.
 
the_rebel_medic said:
Hmm, a study was actually taken on guys wangs (grow up watermelon34)

Biggest to smallest, this order

Que-Ever
Africa
Australia
South American countries
Canada
USA
Europe
Asia
Japan ( i kid you not)

thats all I know for sure, except asian people all have black hair (unless dyed)
Fixed.
 
I assure you, Qckbeam has a penis that would make all those entire countries tremble in awe.
 
Angry Lawyer said:
It's true.

-Angry Lawyer

Its gravitational effect is so great, that even I was drawn back to halflife2.net, and the post about qck.
And this is the internet, so what I just said doesn't even make sense. Outside the context of qck's penis and its bending of reality, due to beingso awesome, anyway
 
Of course there are differences, not only between subspecies, but within them. Anyone who has traveled their fair bit in Europe will be able to tell the difference between a Pole and a Brit.
 
When fully erect and engaged in thrusting activities my penis has been known to puncture the very fabric of space-time, creating what scientists refer to as wormholes.
 
the_rebel_medic said:
Hmm, a study was actually taken on guys wangs (grow up watermelon34)

Biggest to smallest, this order

Africa
Australia
South American countries
Canada
USA
Europe
Asia
Japan ( i kid you not)

thats all I know for sure, except asian people all have black hair (unless dyed)


I think the fact that black men have larger penises is a well known myth.

There's no real reliable documentation on penis size differences between races.
 
Codcommando said:
hehe mongoloid:LOL:


mongoloid meaning from the Mongol people ...gengkis khan was a mongol

what you're thinking of mongoloid as in Downs Syndrome, but that's not a medical term anymore ...not that you'd call someone with a handicap a mongoloid, right?
 
Raziaar said:
There's no real reliable documentation on penis size differences between races.

them someone whit a ruler should take the size of all the penises in the world?
 
<RJMC> said:
them someone whit a ruler should take the size of all the penises in the world?

You can do it. I don't want to see billions of penises, not over the course of my lifetime.
 
Although there is a stereotype that Africans are larger on average compared to Caucasians, and East Asians are smaller— there are no reliable data backing these perceptions. There have been many studies with claims of varying rigor—for example, the LifeStyles condoms study—but they are generally flawed by selection bias. Frantz Fanon covers this subject in some detail in Black Skin, White Masks (1952), where he tends towards the view that the supposed positive correlation between large penises and African ancestry is a myth, a conclusion that he backs up with statistics. On the other hand, J. Philippe Rushton has published statistics claiming otherwise (Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective, 1995). Overall, most experts claim that race has nothing to do with penis size.

Good old wikipedia.
 
Raziaar said:
You can do it. I don't want to see billions of penises, not over the course of my lifetime.
lets hire a hot girl for that
 
CptStern said:
mongoloid meaning from the Mongol people ...gengkis khan was a mongol

what you're thinking of mongoloid as in Downs Syndrome, but that's not a medical term anymore ...not that you'd call someone with a handicap a mongoloid, right?
I thought he was just laughing cuz its a silly word. :smoking:


This thread blows, Uriel. It blows harder than a humpback whale blows your dad.
 
Demoting a thread while keeping it alive via posting. Mm.
 
Qonfused said:
Demoting a thread while keeping it alive via posting. Mm.

Too true. All the penis measuring in the world can't help this thread. Wait. Goddamn it, I'm doing it again!
 
Back
Top