clarky003
Tank
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2003
- Messages
- 6,123
- Reaction score
- 1
To put it simply, I personally believe that there are some serious questions around 9/11 and world trade center 7 in particular and for good reason. You only have to watch the archive footage to realise people somehow had foreknowledge of it's exact demise from unknown wires/sources.
Anything I put in politics like this just gets locked by mechagodzilla on the grounds that I 'personally' need to prove that there are oddities in the official story of how this building came down, and if I don't that denies me the right to post debateable subject matter.
I'd just like to make it clear that this is not the case atall and it is a distortion of my stance on this issue. I quite simply think it's important to develop your own opinion on the archive footage that most recently has become very controversial.
Here is a compilation which I think everyone should watch no matter what you believe.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
Here's the recent BBC archive footage:
They report the buildings collapse prior to it actually happening, the building can still be seen standing in the live shot behind Janes head.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l9blqHHOyg[/YOUTUBE]
When the news first comes in the time stamp is confirmed, 25 minutes prior knowledge.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPxnS3PDqIg[/YOUTUBE]
The building doesn't actually collapse till 22:20 gmt.
Bangs followed by firefighters/workmen who seem to of been told the building was going to 'blow up'
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ[/YOUTUBE]
The opinion of a proffessional demolitions expert in Germany:
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI[/YOUTUBE]
Anything I put in politics like this just gets locked by mechagodzilla on the grounds that I 'personally' need to prove that there are oddities in the official story of how this building came down, and if I don't that denies me the right to post debateable subject matter.
I'd just like to make it clear that this is not the case atall and it is a distortion of my stance on this issue. I quite simply think it's important to develop your own opinion on the archive footage that most recently has become very controversial.
Here is a compilation which I think everyone should watch no matter what you believe.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
Here's the recent BBC archive footage:
They report the buildings collapse prior to it actually happening, the building can still be seen standing in the live shot behind Janes head.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l9blqHHOyg[/YOUTUBE]
When the news first comes in the time stamp is confirmed, 25 minutes prior knowledge.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPxnS3PDqIg[/YOUTUBE]
The building doesn't actually collapse till 22:20 gmt.
Bangs followed by firefighters/workmen who seem to of been told the building was going to 'blow up'
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ[/YOUTUBE]
The opinion of a proffessional demolitions expert in Germany:
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI[/YOUTUBE]