Searle Effect Generator mock replication

clarky003

Tank
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
6,123
Reaction score
1
Upgraded demonstration of the Searl effect. 0 volts to 1.5 volts to 0 volts. 200rpm (double speed)

1 roller test
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TM_s0dXRk48[/YOUTUBE]

double speed test
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8qvSNkiB9M[/YOUTUBE]

It's claimed that the addition of a larger diameter second ring with rollers ecompassing this ring and rollers creates a inherant voltage gradient between the two rings if I understand correctly, which allows the rollers to generate the power to start rotation of of their own potential.

The second ring demonstration is on the way, but still, 200 rpm with such a tiny amount of energy input for one ring is beyond amazing.

Here's some background on history and function for those who are unfamiliar with this discovery. It's design and origional testing was done by Proffessor John Searle in the 1960's who discovered that when you placed circular magnets on an inner magnetic ring with a running surface that was magnetically imprinted with a wave like form, then a small amount of standing potential energy would encourage the rollers to follow this imprint, whilst helping each other along increasing rotational speeds.

The rotation generates a natural gradient of positive (+) on the inner ring and negative (-) on the rollers and obviously when you do this at a certain rate it generates electrical flow. He produced 12 foot devices with 3 concentric rings back in the 60's and when he tested his first 12 foot SEG thats when things got a bit weird. With 3 rings of substantial size he reported excessive electrical output, so much so that objects such as radios and other electrical equipment in the near area would turn on by themselves.

As the rotational speeds became immense the outer (3rd) rings rollers would push away from the annular ring from the force and rotate around freely as the electical charge ionised the air completely, creating a vacuum around the device. Then quite simply beyond the scope of understanding as finally described by Searle, the first 12 foot devices were apparently lost, due to them also taking off and somehow propelling themselves into space never to be seen again.
 
sounds interesting, but 12 foot objects propelling themselves into space is a bit excessive.
 
As the rotational speeds became immense the outer (3rd) rings rollers would push away from the annular ring from the force and rotate around freely as the electical charge ionised the air completely, creating a vacuum around the device. Then quite simply beyond the scope of understanding as finally described by Searle, the first 12 foot devices were apparently lost, due to them also taking off and somehow propelling themselves into space never to be seen again.
LOL

It seemed quite believeable up until that :laugh:

Sure, it's possible but man :D
 
It didn't go into space, it went into subspace.
 
Ah the clarky.

The same clarky who I engaged in a debate with after creating he created a similar topic.

In the debate I just made up words and said random crap and he used the same words and posted other rubbish and we went back and forth for ages. Was fun.

Also the same clarky who a few months back made a thread about some flash video 'explaining' the 11th dimensions and how cool it was. I saw it, called bullshit said it showed complete misunderstanding of the 11dimensions and the whole concept of a spacial dimensions. And sure enough someone else found a not on the site saying it was bullshit. I was immensely proud of that.
 
eh? Solaris your making that up, I never posted anything about agreeing with 11 dimensions, only that it was interesting :O I've posted stuff about 5 dimensional theory before that's all I can recall.

Honestly some of you are so easy to get worked up it's amazing lol, Searle claims that's what happened I havn't seen it yet so I can't agree because I havn't seen it, I was reiterating the description of phenomena he apparently witnessed.

People used to actually like discussing fringe tech and all sorts of controversial things, these days the site seems to of turned into a spamfest and preferance to personal flaming rather than discussing the issue, which should lead people to question how mature or for better word the lack of maturity around the forums.

The whole 'the Clarky' thing , well to be honest it's dimwit humour and it's not even funny.
 
Well Clarky if you expect us to debate about something that zero-point energy'd its way into space, you'll find that certain people will be reluctant to join the discussion. :p
 
Without knowing the mass of those rollers, its a pointless debate.

I'd like to suggest at this point that they'll weigh **** all, and that the instant you attach a load to them the thing will stop very quickly.

In other words, a load of rubbish. I can get a speaker cone to oscillate at 5000Hz with only a volt. Big deal.
 
You have to admit Mr. Parrot this device is a new concept unlike your speaker example. This world need innovators with new ideas, there lays the hope of finding solutions to the worlds needs. You only offered half empty glass comments at most, there is no hope with your kind. Look deeper Mr. Parrot or you will remain blissfully ignorant.
 
Hovercar or gtfo.

You have to admit Mr. Parrot this device is a new concept unlike your speaker example. This world need innovators with new ideas, there lays the hope of finding solutions to the worlds needs. You only offered half empty glass comments at most, there is no hope with your kind. Look deeper Mr. Parrot or you will remain blissfully ignorant.

Brave 1st post.
 
You have to admit Mr. Parrot this device is a new concept unlike your speaker example. This world need innovators with new ideas, there lays the hope of finding solutions to the worlds needs. You only offered half empty glass comments at most, there is no hope with your kind. Look deeper Mr. Parrot or you will remain blissfully ignorant.

I thought the whole point was that this wasn't a new idea. It's over half a century old.

And the experiment only proves what we already know, that it is possible to use electromagnets to spin other magnets around a magnetic disc. It's all just regular physics. If you read the site, there is no magical production of electricity, there is no levitation. This is just a proof of part of the concept. There is no actual searle effect being demonstrated in the video.
 
the effect is most likely true, but i'd say it has nothing to do with scalar waves or zero point energy.

my gut feeling tells me that if it is on the internet it is probably useless and hundreds of scientists already tried it at some point in their life only to find out that it looks cool but nothing else.


one question tough...how do you stop the machine?
 
Actually that's a good point, if it does what they say it does how do you stop it.. with a stick? lol.
 
Actually that's a good point, if it does what they say it does how do you stop it.. with a stick? lol.

I'd guess you'd have to move the outer stator away homogeneously not to make any disruptions and cause the machine to rip apart at those speeds. but i couldn't notice any movement.

Based on the second video on how the machine was operated i'd say it is just a variation of an electromagnetic motor. The weird start up and even more weird, gradual but fast stop. it's like the current was turned down.



i would like to say that we need highly efficient motors, not generators that produce more energy than they get. Where i would say that it is not possible in our universe.
 
Shit, that's alright aye! We got some smart people on this earth i reckon!

:D
 
You have to admit Mr. Parrot this device is a new concept unlike your speaker example. This world need innovators with new ideas, there lays the hope of finding solutions to the worlds needs. You only offered half empty glass comments at most, there is no hope with your kind. Look deeper Mr. Parrot or you will remain blissfully ignorant.

OH WOOT!!! WELL DONE NEWBIE!!! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D


:thumbs:
 
More videos from the professor.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46gRnzI2os0[/YOUTUBE]

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bb3N1epMG7A[/YOUTUBE]

edit: [YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6RSIeL6yh0[/YOUTUBE]
 
i would like to say that we need highly efficient motors, not generators that produce more energy than they get. Where i would say that it is not possible in our universe.

obviously you have no idea how much of a boon it would be, if we could create a generator that produced more energy then was put it.
 
Which we can't, so we should put that effort into making more efficient machines, rather than impossible ones.
 
Actually that's a good point, if it does what they say it does how do you stop it.. with a stick? lol.

My guess would be to put a load on it that it cant produce enough energy for. Thus bringing it all to a halt because it no longer has the energy to self-sustain its movement.
 
Which we can't, so we should put that effort into making more efficient machines, rather than impossible ones.

I don't know, I'm working on a device that will harness the energy of stupid people, I think it might work.
 
I believe it will work like he says and it takes a certain understanding of the way things work, most certainly not a classical understanding that can't even begin to explain this. The electron recieves it's energy from a 'virtual particle flux' and needs it in order to function properly, a well known scientific fact.

Now if we want to understand what is possibly going on in simple terms then Searle's claims can be summed up in a nice little analogy..

That energy that is naturally being fed to the electrons from the vacuum happened since the dawn of time, so of course we never started that. What he claims is you can use that natural flow of energy on itself through magnetisim to stimulate an imbalance allowing more to come through.

So it's like a river and your using the natural energy of that river on itself to 'widen the banks' to let more come through. It is accepted science that the universe is being 'powered' at the quantum level by what you would term as 'free energy' this device utilises complex magnetic fields and rotation of those fields to disturb that natural balance somehow.

So saying this is impossible is about as nieve as it gets. We just don't fully understand where the energy is coming from, so most people just leave it alone. We basically ignore it through lack of comprehension because it appears to violate old scientific understanding, and that's not good enough.
 
Searl Effect Generator 3D animation

Gentlemen (Ladies too), may I direct your attention to a newly posted animation of the Searl Effect Generator at http://swallowcommand.com This is an accurate depiction of the proposed SEG currently being built and it is expected to effectively convert ambient energy in to useful electrical power.
 

Attachments

  • SEG 3D.jpg
    SEG 3D.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 159
neato. Now who is the guy with the bold print.. D:! ADVERTISER!
 
That looks cool, dont some roller coaster's work like this.
 
Make millions of them then, and make them power each other... then I can boil my water for FREE!
 
That looks cool, dont some roller coaster's work like this.


Asuka you are correct, the SEG does utilize this technology and it is call a Linear Induction Motor (LIM), These days it is used to launch roller coasters and it is also being consider for use in launching aircraft from carriers, but keep in mind this is just one facet of the Searl Effect Generator.
Great observation Asuka!:thumbs:
 
Back
Top