sig images?

[PistolOnly]

hmm how comes sig images are turned off?

 

[StarMonkey]

I presonally dislike them because it makes the pages take longer to load (i'm on 56k), and you end up with the majority of the page being made up of big sig images, and very little post text (the reason these forums are here)

 

[Stone]

I agree, that it's a Good Thing™ that they're off...personnaly they really annoy me... not that it really maters due to everyone (excp a few unlucky people) having broadband etc...but still keep them turned off

 

[Hot Soup]

if we wanted our boards to be as annoying as the dod ones we would have sigs on .. but we dont

 

[jhero]

The only good sig is a subtle sig.

 

[Jagermeister]

Yea, the board looks clean without any image sigs. But if there were image sigs those who don't like them should have the option to turn off other peoples sigs via forum options.

I made a really cool one too :E

 

[jhero]

Hehe, putting sigs back on!

 

[Dave]

There is an option to disable signatures and avatars, I took a screenshot from these forum options and attached it (in case you didn't want to hop over to your options panel and look for yourself ).

So I think it would be nice if they were enabled, but have a limit. I would think Jager's signature above is a good maximum size.

 

[Majestic XII]

I want to read the post not the signs.

 

[StarMonkey]

Originally posted by nietzsche
True, true. And a persistent one it should be. Munro, where's the "Include Signature" option of the quick-reply feature?

I purposefully didnt include it

 

[Fat Tony!]

why?

 

[Murray_H]

I want to read the post not the signs

I agree, and somebody always goes OTT and has 5 pics of their favourite babe/some shit to do with CS or other game. And they get boring fast